|
|
I personally find the time I spend developing FIRST teams and FIRST as a whole the most fulfilling thing I have ever done in my life. - PayneTrain [more] |
 |
|
|
|
|
2016 Championship divisions compared to other top competitions
By: microbuns
New: 26-04-2016 01:43
Updated: 26-04-2016 01:43
Views: 1821 times
Discussion
26-04-2016 08:40
kitare102
Re: pic: 2016 Championship divisions compared to other top competitions
I'm not particularly familiar with strategy, so there might be something obvious that's passing right over my head, but I have no idea how to read this graph. Could you elaborate on the metrics being used?
26-04-2016 08:49
Dezion
Re: pic: 2016 Championship divisions compared to other top competitions
Quote:
Originally Posted by kitare102
I'm not particularly familiar with strategy, so there might be something obvious that's passing right over my head, but I have no idea how to read this graph. Could you elaborate on the metrics being used?
|
Though I can't be 100% certain, it appears, much like most of the other graphs and data being posted recently, the y-axis represents highest OPR and the x-axis represents the teams at each event/division.
26-04-2016 09:06
Brian Maher
Re: pic: 2016 Championship divisions compared to other top competitions
It would appear to be OPR rank on the x-axis and OPR on the y-axis for various events.
26-04-2016 10:18
Ether
Re: pic: 2016 Championship divisions compared to other top competitions
Quote:
Originally Posted by kitare102
I have no idea how to read this graph.
|
The Y axis appears to be team max OPR value (for an event).
The X axis appears to be the number of teams greater than or equal to the OPR value on the Y axis.
26-04-2016 10:24
plnyyanks
Re: pic: 2016 Championship divisions compared to other top competitions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether
The Y axis appears to be team max OPR value (for an event).
The X axis appears to be the number of teams greater than or equal to the OPR value on the Y axis.
|
That's how I read it also. Remember kids, always label your axes! (not doing so could have unintended consequences)
26-04-2016 11:10
EmileH
Re: pic: 2016 Championship divisions compared to other top competitions
Quote:
Originally Posted by plnyyanks
That's how I read it also. Remember kids, always label your axes! (not doing so could have unintended consequences)

|
+30 xkcd use points
If you had labeled your axes, FiM's massive gap would make slightly more sense.
26-04-2016 12:08
Ether
Re: pic: 2016 Championship divisions compared to other top competitions
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmileH
If you had labeled your axes, FiM's massive gap would make slightly more sense. 
|
If the "massive gap" you are referring to is the MICMP curve stretching far to the right of all the others, that's because MICMP had 102 teams, far more than others.
Using percentile on the X-axis makes a better apples-to-apples comparison.
26-04-2016 15:06
microbuns
Re: pic: 2016 Championship divisions compared to other top competitions
Sorry I didnt know that uploading a photo created a thread! This photo was meant for this thread. I apologize for not labeling - I assumed the only people seeing it will be those familiar with Joe J's visualizations. Oops!
Ether, I did percentiles in the other picture I uploaded. No percentiles were used here to illustrate the depth of each event.
previous
next
Tags
loading ...
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:45.