Go to Post My son just said, "That's the kind of thing that you talk about in strategy sessions then say, 'nah, that would never really work.'" Un-be-freaking-lievable. - Rick TYler [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > CD-Media > Photos
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

photos

papers

everything



Experimental VP drive gearbox

Roboshant

By: Roboshant
New: 22-07-2016 01:27
Updated: 22-07-2016 01:27
Views: 1376 times


Experimental VP drive gearbox

Experimental VP drive gearbox I designed (still missing things like fasteners). I would use threaded rods to connect the 4 plates together. The gears are attached to the CIM using the andymark 8mm to hex adapter.

Recent Viewers

  • Guest

Discussion

view entire thread

Reply

22-07-2016 02:07

pwnageNick


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

Can you explain what benefits you were looking to get with this design over a standard single speed gearbox? I'm not sure how this would save weight (pretty sure this would weigh more than any custom single speed gearbox) and it doesn't seem like it cuts down on custom parts much. Just wondering if there was some other objective driving this design, or if you were just doing it for exercise to see how utilizing a VP for a drive train gearbox would work.



22-07-2016 02:13

Roboshant


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

I did it mainly as an exercise, and just to make something that was compact and looked cool. I wasn't really looking to save weight, I was more focused on saving space. I initially had this idea looking at your planetary drive a while ago, but never really got the time to do it. I was also inspired by 1296's 775 pro vp drive gearbox. At the end of the day this is probably that is never going to get made.



22-07-2016 02:16

Roboshant


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

Here is another view of the gearbox:

link: https://gyazo.com/5bb9699132af2e6b6ffa06fb561d478a



22-07-2016 02:19

bkahl


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

Are you sure that the VP will hold up with 2 CIMs powering it?

The load ratings sheet for VPs shows very different charts for a 775 motor and a CIM motor, let alone 2. While this design may hold up okay for a 775pro or 2, I think this may put the VP out of spec with 2 CIM motors driving it.

I would be pretty cautious about 1 CIM going into a VP, let alone 2. Especially in a dynamic loading situation like a drivetrain.


Edit:

What transfers power from the initial gear reduction into the VP?



22-07-2016 02:22

pwnageNick


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboshant View Post
Here is another view of the gearbox:
Picture did not load for me.



22-07-2016 02:31

Roboshant


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkahl View Post
Are you sure that the VP will hold up with 2 CIMs powering it?

The load ratings sheet for VPs shows very different charts for a 775 motor and a CIM motor, let alone 2. While this design may hold up okay for a 775pro, I think this may put the VP out of spec with 2 CIM motors driving it.

I would be pretty cautious about 1 CIM going into a VP, let alone 2. Especially in a dynamic loading situation like a drivetrain.
Yeah that is something that I definitely did not consider when designing this gearbox. Talking to a student on 1296 about their gearbox, he said that they welded the pins and bored the sun gears and added needle bearings, but considering the step up from 2 775 pros it probably would encounter problems. It would be interesting to see how a GEM would work for this application.



22-07-2016 02:33

pwnageNick


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboshant View Post
Yeah that is something that I definitely did not consider when designing this gearbox. Talking to a student on 1296 about their gearbox, he said that they welded the pins and bored the sun gears and added needle bearings, but considering the step up from 2 775 pros it probably would encounter problems. It would be interesting to see how a GEM would work for this application.
Interesting design challenge, but for a single speed just minimizing the amount of gears (single reduction ideally) and minimizing the machined parts tends to be the best way to go. No need to get fancy with a single speed gearbox, that's the main benefit; simple, light-weight, and saving space.



22-07-2016 07:12

pilleya


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkahl View Post
Are you sure that the VP will hold up with 2 CIMs powering it?

The load ratings sheet for VPs shows very different charts for a 775 motor and a CIM motor, let alone 2. While this design may hold up okay for a 775pro or 2, I think this may put the VP out of spec with 2 CIM motors driving it.

I would be pretty cautious about 1 CIM going into a VP, let alone 2. Especially in a dynamic loading situation like a drivetrain.
The reason the VP load rating charts are very different is that the 775pro has a free speed of around 18730rpm and produces 0.71 N.m of torque at stall. The CIM on the over hand has a free speed of around 5330rpm and can produce 2.41 N.m of torque at stall.

The 775pro needs a greater reduction (3 or 4:1) in order to match the speed and torque of the CIM. This is the reason why with a CIM 64:1 is the maximum ratio for safe operation, and with a 775pro a 210:1 is the max.

A major benefit of having a gearbox based around a VP is its ability to be highly versatile. It enables you to fine tune the robots FPS easily. Meaning that you can find the perfect gearing for getting over that obstacle or moving to that point as fast as possible. A gearbox like this could be really good for drivetrain prototyping and testing, as it would enable quick tuning of gear ratios, the results of the testing could then be used to determine the required reduction of the conventional spur gear gearbox.



22-07-2016 09:45

Chris is me


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by pilleya View Post
The reason the VP load rating charts are very different is that the 775pro has a free speed of around 18730rpm and produces 0.71 N.m of torque at stall. The CIM on the over hand has a free speed of around 5330rpm and can produce 2.41 N.m of torque at stall.

The 775pro needs a greater reduction (3 or 4:1) in order to match the speed and torque of the CIM. This is the reason why with a CIM 64:1 is the maximum ratio for safe operation, and with a 775pro a 210:1 is the max.
That's his point - the max safe ratio for a box with 2 CIMs would probably be something in the ballpark of 32:1.

While you get some flexibility in gearing in a setup like this, I think in reality you'd find the ratios you get to choose would be a bit too spread out to actually be practical for this application. You can do 3:1, 4:1, 5:1, and 7:1 stages. So you'd have to jump quite a large gap in your reduction to change things out. Generally when you want to change a drivetrain gearbox ratio you don't want to go from 16 FPS to 8 FPS, you want to raise or lower the ratio just a small amount. This kind of gearing flexibility can be designed into custom spur gearboxes fairly easily - ie a 20:54 reduction could be replaced with a 24:50 or even a 18:56 reduction in order to fine tune the precise reduction.



22-07-2016 10:33

Deke


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

Another thing to consider when going through these exercises is that generally a planetary gear system will be less efficient than a spur gear system.

This may not always be the case, but there are usually more interfaces and bearing surfaces that create more friction in the planetary system. The planetary shines with its packaging for high reduction instances, where a spur gear system will take up more room for the same reduction.

A side note for the VP load cases. If you use a 3, 4, or 5:1 as the output stage is the VP, the hex shaft will fail before the stage will. Those are the three strongest stages, we did some rough solid mechanics calculations on it this year for our intake rotation. However, the gears are more brittle and if we twisted the hex shaft, the gears exploded due to the hardness, but usually the hex shaft twisted before the gear box exploded. The shaft is more ductile than the gears. I would be concerned about shock loads in a drive train if you are geared too high with the ratios. If the gearing is low enough, it should reduce that concern.



24-07-2016 20:53

Aren_Hill


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

We (1296) did end up trying a swap to 9:1 from the 7:1 is was running at, but decided to stay faster.

We did TIG weld the pins into the carrier, and ream out the planet gears for needle bearings.

Overall it was 12:48 via a 3mm gt2 best with WCP pulleys, and then 7:1 and an Integrated encoder, direct driving a 6" wheel from WCP.
Gearbox was fine, rode a bit too close to the sun speed wise with the motors.

Would I recommend this to most teams? nope, but being as familiar as I am with the system the Crew and I gave it a whirl.

-Aren



24-07-2016 20:56

mman1506


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aren_Hill View Post
We (1296) did end up trying a swap to 9:1 from the 7:1 is was running at, but decided to stay faster.

We did TIG weld the pins into the carrier, and ream out the planet gears for needle bearings.

Overall it was 12:48 via a 3mm gt2 best with WCP pulleys, and then 7:1 and an Integrated encoder, direct driving a 6" wheel from WCP.
Gearbox was fine, rode a bit too close to the sun speed wise with the motors.

Would I recommend this to most teams? nope, but being as familiar as I am with the system the Crew and I gave it a whirl.

-Aren
Would you mind sharing some pictures/details of your gearbox especially the VP input? It would greatly appreciated.



24-07-2016 21:15

Harrison.Smith


Unread Re: pic: Experimental VP drive gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by mman1506 View Post
Would you mind sharing some pictures/details of your gearbox especially the VP input? It would greatly appreciated.
The larger pulley is on a keyed 8mm shaft that is going through a bearing, then we have the input block bearing on an input coupler. Then we have a modified input coupler (removed the flange). This is what drives the sun gear. The VP is set up: dead stage, 7:1, Encoder. Hope this helps!

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8...1Q3Z01aV2tMTlk
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8...nZlNGU4YzNpSDA



view entire thread

Reply
previous
next

Tags

loading ...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:39.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi