|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
A 7.5" tall robot. It's so short that it's impossible for it not to be able to go under the low bar, unless you put the intake/shooter all the way up and flip the hook up as well.
Geared for 14fps, although that can be changed to up to 16fps by messing with the first stage CIM pulleys. Runs a 4-CIM drivetrain with 6" WCP pneumatic wheels.
Weight is 64lbs without bumpers or battery. It weighs 97lbs with bumpers and battery.
Shooter is powered by a single 775pro due to space concerns, and is at a 20:12 (not sure on that) reduction. The hood uses a REV smart servo and a gear rack to roll in and out up to a 20* change in shooting angle.
The intake and shooter move in and out via a two 775pro motors on a ~150:1 reduction with a VP and a small gear reduction. Hard stops are rubber and are integrated into the 4-bar linkage.
Not shown: a string that pulls the ball guide up so that the ball rests against it properly before the shot, rivets, encoders, a few screws here and there, and a couple mounting plates and wires for electronics. That being said, all the electronics are in there. I have space for the encoders but neglected to add them because I was so done with this project after the first few days.
CAD will be available on the 2015 offseason release, because I still haven't moved anything to a 2016 offseason folder. 
Things I would change/add:
-Encoders
-Climber (there's a design for one, but I haven't the heart to finish it)
-Extra shooter motor
-Better bumper supports (a welded sheet metal plate in the front and back would have done wonders)
and:
-CDF/Portcullis attachment.
Surprisingly, this was harder to do than a climber, at least in the packaging I wanted. I could tack it onto the intake with everything else, but as I said before I got really tired of this. Working inside the tiny envelope was fun, but definitely not something I would want to do in-season. That being said, I would be reasonably confident building this robot IRL.
I forgot to mention, the colors are blue and gold to match the colors of a new rookie team coming up next year!
10-08-2016 09:28
Kevin Leonard
So would this theoretical robot be able to cross under the low bar while holding a ball? It seems like in order to do anything useful it needs to be in the taller position.
10-08-2016 10:02
SenorZI like it.
I brought up a "collapsing" shooter idea after build season, as a side project.
My team all shook their heads. 
10-08-2016 10:40
Chris is meIs there anything locking the shooter in position when it is in the firing position? It seems at least plausible that the ball being forced into the shooter could cause the shooter to give a little bit while firing, and generally you want all the rigidity you can get with such a system for consistency reasons.
I like the intake and shooter articulating together as it probably adds a lot of consistency to the ball loading.
Just curious - how are you avoiding this mechanism tangling with the battery cable when it folds up?
10-08-2016 13:48
asid61|
So would this theoretical robot be able to cross under the low bar while holding a ball? It seems like in order to do anything useful it needs to be in the taller position.
|
|
I like it.
I brought up a "collapsing" shooter idea after build season, as a side project. My team all shook their heads. ![]() |
|
Is there anything locking the shooter in position when it is in the firing position? It seems at least plausible that the ball being forced into the shooter could cause the shooter to give a little bit while firing, and generally you want all the rigidity you can get with such a system for consistency reasons.
I like the intake and shooter articulating together as it probably adds a lot of consistency to the ball loading. Just curious - how are you avoiding this mechanism tangling with the battery cable when it folds up? |
10-08-2016 14:37
edesirimAccording to the rules, the ball has a diameter of 10". I just wanted to know if the intake folds up or something and the robot chassis itself? Just a clarifying question. 
10-08-2016 14:58
asid61|
According to the rules, the ball has a diameter of 10". I just wanted to know if the intake folds up or something and the robot chassis itself? Just a clarifying question.
![]() |
10-08-2016 15:06
ThaddeusMaximusLove the battery packaging.
10-08-2016 15:07
Jeremy Germita
I don't see any clearance for a tube fitting on your hood cylinders(picture). As it stands, you'll only be able to supply air to the retract side of the cylinder. It looks like you might have enough room to just space your shooter bearing plates a little more to clear a fitting, but I haven't looked at the CAD closely enough to see if this is possible.
Other than that, I really like the usage of the four-bar. I love seeing neat linkages on robots.
10-08-2016 15:35
asid61
|
I don't see any clearance for a tube fitting on your hood cylinders(picture). As it stands, you'll only be able to supply air to the retract side of the cylinder. It looks like you might have enough room to just space your shooter bearing plates a little more to clear a fitting, but I haven't looked at the CAD closely enough to see if this is possible.
Other than that, I really like the usage of the four-bar. I love seeing neat linkages on robots. |
10-08-2016 16:48
Greg Woelki|
Nooooo does this mean I have to re-render!?
I think I can push the mounting plates out by another 3/8" at least, or add a hole to allow the fitting in. |
10-08-2016 17:25
asid61|
A simpler option might be to use the 90 degree rotated ports version of the cylinder (Bimba offers this for their rear pivot cylinders, I'd imagine other manufacturers do as well).
|
10-08-2016 17:32
Chris is me|
Given that it's already a custom 3.6" stroke cylinder, this is a great option actually.
|
10-08-2016 17:38
asid61|
Is it really not possible to go to a standard size here? It can't be that hard to add .1" to the length of your ball joint or something.
|
10-08-2016 21:44
frcguy
How well would those little read Mecanum wheels on the side of the intake work for directing balls closer to the intake? Do they make a noticeable improvement for ball collection?
10-08-2016 21:48
asid61|
How well would those little read Mecanum wheels on the side of the intake work for directing balls closer to the intake? Do they make a noticeable improvement for ball collection?
|
10-08-2016 22:05
Golfer4646With this robot, what would your starting configuration be? (Aka, are you able to hold a boulder, while still being within frame perimeter?)
10-08-2016 22:14
asid61|
With this robot, what would your starting configuration be? (Aka, are you able to hold a boulder, while still being within frame perimeter?)
|
10-08-2016 22:40
AdamHeard
|
Because of the tiny packaging and cramped spacers, especially near the shooter/hood, I couldn't make it 3.5" or 4". 3.75" is a custom size anyway, or I would have to use metric. I did try to use a standard size, but the layouts just didn't work out.
|
10-08-2016 22:50
asid61|
The custom sizes have poor lead times.
You can definitely make this work with a longer or shorter cylinder, don't forget you don't have to actually use the full travel of a cylinder (and can externally set the travel). |

10-08-2016 23:18
Sperkowsky
Are there any tensioners on the shooter belt that runs through the tube? If so could I get a look at it?
10-08-2016 23:34
asid61|
Are there any tensioners on the shooter belt that runs through the tube? If so could I get a look at it?
|