|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
05-02-2017 22:45
Lil' Lavery
Love the gear intake/delivery mechanism.
05-02-2017 22:49
D_PriceLooks good. Nice and low design. Any hopper going to be implemented later?
05-02-2017 22:53
Sperkowsky
looks like a solid gear robot.
05-02-2017 23:02
BotDesignerI am having trouble understanding how the gear intake is supposed to work. I am really happy to see how teams are specializing this year. It should make things interesting.
05-02-2017 23:09
rcmolloy
|
I am having trouble understanding how the gear intake is supposed to work. I am really happy to see how teams are specializing this year. It should make things interesting.
|
05-02-2017 23:12
Billfred
|
I am having trouble understanding how the gear intake is supposed to work. I am really happy to see how teams are specializing this year. It should make things interesting.
|
05-02-2017 23:24
Lil' Lavery
That's not a floor intake, it's a climber.
05-02-2017 23:26
Jcarbon|
I am having trouble understanding how the gear intake is supposed to work. I am really happy to see how teams are specializing this year. It should make things interesting.
|
05-02-2017 23:29
TheNerdJediI can see this being a very successful robot, two weeks left for tons of practice for those drivers!
05-02-2017 23:36
Basel A
|
Looks good. Nice and low design. Any hopper going to be implemented later?
|
05-02-2017 23:51
Helium_1s2Hey! That's my shoe!
06-02-2017 00:12
cbale2000Is that roller legal? It looks like it extends outside the frame perimeter to me (which wouldn't be a problem after the match starts, but it has to start inside the frame before the match).
06-02-2017 00:18
HannahFLooking good!! I am glad to see that we (433) are not the only team going with a "load from one side place from the other side" gear specialist strategy. Best of Luck at your competitions.
~Hannah
06-02-2017 00:20
Basel A
|
Is that roller legal? It looks like it extends outside the frame perimeter to me (which wouldn't be a problem after the match starts, but it has to start inside the frame before the match).
|
06-02-2017 00:20
JB987Looks like pliable roller 'fingers' can be pulled into the frame perimeter before start of match so should be legal.
06-02-2017 04:04
GeeTwo
Nice - similar to our robot in general delivery, but we're not that far along, and we're leaving space for a floor pickup; our "gear holder" goes far enough back to accept a gear coming up from the floor, and tilts farther forward to push the gear onto the peg for a more secure position.
06-02-2017 09:41
Chris is meI love this robot. It stays simple but should be very effective at what it's attempting to accomplish, and plus you finished super early so you have plenty of practice time. This is the robot a lot of FRC should have built, and they will be kicking themselves for not having gone in this direction.
06-02-2017 09:48
Hgree56|
I am glad to see that we (433) are not the only team going with a "load from one side place from the other side" gear specialist strategy.
|
06-02-2017 10:41
Basel A
|
Looking good!! I am glad to see that we (433) are not the only team going with a "load from one side place from the other side" gear specialist strategy. Best of Luck at your competitions.
~Hannah |
|
I love this robot. It stays simple but should be very effective at what it's attempting to accomplish, and plus you finished super early so you have plenty of practice time. This is the robot a lot of FRC should have built, and they will be kicking themselves for not having gone in this direction.
|
06-02-2017 12:21
snekiamAs a member of the controls team on 3322, I am extremely excited to have a bot to test with at this point in the season. Gives us plenty of time to test automating driver actions.
06-02-2017 12:59
messer5740So why makes this design more efficient than a "cereal box" type of gear manipulator where the gear can be "stabbed" by the spring and barb and pulled up by the pilot?
Just playing devil's advocate here
06-02-2017 13:02
pmattin5459|
So why makes this design more efficient than a "cereal box" type of gear manipulator where the gear can be "stabbed" by the spring and barb and pulled up by the pilot?
Just playing devil's advocate here |
06-02-2017 13:02
Chris is me|
So why makes this design more efficient than a "cereal box" type of gear manipulator where the gear can be "stabbed" by the spring and barb and pulled up by the pilot?
Just playing devil's advocate here |
06-02-2017 13:09
PayneTrainA lot of people still knee deep in their build are really mad at you/themselves.
Nice work.
06-02-2017 13:12
BotDesigner|
So why makes this design more efficient than a "cereal box" type of gear manipulator where the gear can be "stabbed" by the spring and barb and pulled up by the pilot?
Just playing devil's advocate here |
|
The gear holder at the front actuates backward to line up with the bottom end of the ramp. The gear drops from the chute down the ramp and into the holder, which then actuates forward to place the gear. Once on the peg, the pilot lifts the gear out of the robot.
|
06-02-2017 13:15
Basel A
|
You don't have to wait for the human player to finish fishing the gear out before your robot drives away. This shaves a few seconds per cycle, which really adds up.
|
|
assuming better alliances will be able to get all 4 rotors going
|
06-02-2017 13:34
HannahF|
It's interesting strategically, and we had many discussions about it. One bonus is that you can tweak your gear receiver without affecting your gear placer. The bigger point is that we think it'll skim time off our cycles because of the driving path. If you're one-sided, the best choice is to do a stop-and-go near the lift, which is very susceptible to defense. In this case, you do a sharp turn to line up with the nearest lift, or not so sharp and go to an alternative lift (altogether, should hold up better under defense).
It's funny, I feel like up to this point last season, we accomplished a similar amount of work. But we tried to do too much, and so we were nowhere. I'm feeling good about this year. Don't get me wrong, we're not nearly finished, so many tweaks to make and still a whole comp bot to build, but I'm just happy to have time for tweaking, testing, and practising. |
06-02-2017 13:42
IKEKudos for the foresight to recognize the potential power of extra drive time vs. going after other objectives. This solution probably has the most "Bang for the Buck", and finishing early to get the stick time will make it incredibly effective.
06-02-2017 15:11
Chris is me|
Actually, we don't release the gear onto the peg. "A few seconds" is a gross exaggeration. Our testing suggested that, if your pilot is ready, you save a fraction of a second at most. And our pilot will be ready.
|
06-02-2017 15:26
messer5740|
You don't have to wait for the human player to finish fishing the gear out before your robot drives away. This shaves a few seconds per cycle, which really adds up.
The low angle of the human load collecting mechanism also makes the loading faster and more reliable than other mechanisms. |
06-02-2017 15:57
Jcarbon|
Hmm that may be true, but I can't really see how this design allows for the robot to deposit the gear on the spring and drive away without the pilot fishing it out...am I missing something?
|
06-02-2017 17:40
messer5740|
Yes, you're correct. The pilot has to lift the gear out of the robot before the robot can drive away. We're confident that whatever time you could save by dropping it off without the pilot isn't worth the additional complexity.
|
06-02-2017 17:45
pmattin5459|
Ok our team designed a passive gear deliverer system too, we are testing in a few days at a practice field...hopefully you are right about the less hassle! Do you think having a drivetrain that allows linear strafing would also save time when depositing?
|
06-02-2017 19:43
Jcarbon|
Ok our team designed a passive gear deliverer system too, we are testing in a few days at a practice field...hopefully you are right about the less hassle! Do you think having a drivetrain that allows linear strafing would also save time when depositing?
|