We read in many threads that this or that regional has a strong field, great offensive teams, long history, etc.
I thought it would be fun to analyze the strength of the 2007 STL field using two easily available metrics for each participating team:
(1) experience measured in previous FRC events, and
(2) awards won as listed on the FRC website.
Clearly we will have some very experienced teams that have won many awards. We will also have seven rookie teams. So what do the averages look like?
Including the whole 2007 STL field, the average team experience is 6 FRC events and the average team has previously won 4.6 awards.
How much are these averages influenced by the top teams and rookies? Re-computing without 45, 217, and the rookies, the average team experience is still 6 FRC events and the average team has won 4 awards.
I donāt know how these averages compare to those for other regionals, and Iāll leave that calculation as an exercise for anyone who is interested. The 2007 STL averages look very strong to me.
And oh, yeah, the 2007 STL field also includes ten teams that have previously been regional winners, six that have previously won regional chairmanās awards, and six with at least one mentor who has previously been a regional Woodie Flowers Award finalist.
All things considered, 2007 STL is a very strong field of teams. 


