2010 Regional Stats

That’s a good idea.
Why don’t you add that? :slight_smile:

Here’s another way to look at it all.
This focuses on the number of matches overall which is a risky gamble for an event. Guessing how many matches you’ll be able to do before you’ve started and found what problems teams and the field will have is a real challenge.


------------------------------- # teams ---- # matches ---- Matches/team
**Overall Averages --------------- 39 ----------- 79 ----------- 10**
Greater Kansas City Regional-- 60 ---------- 99 ---------- 10
Los Angeles Regional ---------- 58 ---------- 97 ---------- 10
Microsoft Seattle Regional ----- 64 ---------- 96 ----------- 9
Arizona Regional -------------- 56 ---------- 94 ---------- 10
Autodesk Oregon Regional ---- 61 ---------- 92 ----------- 9
New Jersey Regional ---------- 61 ---------- 92 ----------- 9
Chesapeake Regional ---------- 50 ---------- 92 ---------- 11
Oklahoma Regional ------------ 55 ---------- 92 ---------- 10
Buckeye Regional ------------- 60 ---------- 90 ----------- 9
Washington DC Regional ------ 59 ---------- 89 ----------- 9
Florida Regional --------------- 53 ---------- 89 ---------- 10
SBPLI Long Island Regional --- 48 ---------- 88 ---------- 11
Wisconsin Regional ------------ 50 ---------- 84 ---------- 10
New York City Regional ------ 64 ---------- 84 ----------- 8
Silicon Valley Regional -------- 50 ---------- 84 ---------- 10
San Diego Regional ----------- 49 ---------- 82 ---------- 10
Peachtree Regional ------------ 50 ---------- 82 ---------- 10
Virginia Regional -------------- 63 ---------- 82 ----------- 8
West Michigan District -------- 41 ---------- 82 ---------- 12
BAE Granite State Regional --- 48 ---------- 80 ---------- 10
Ann Arbor District ------------ 40 ---------- 80 ---------- 12
Boston Regional -------------- 53 ---------- 80 ----------- 9
Troy District ------------------ 40 ---------- 80 ---------- 12
Dallas Regional -------------- 53 ----------- 78 ----------- 9
Traverse City District --------- 38 ---------- 76 ---------- 12
Detroit District --------------- 38 ---------- 76 ---------- 12
Finger Lakes Regional ------- 44 ---------- 74 ---------- 10
Kettering District ------------ 40 ---------- 74 ---------- 11
Cass Tech District ----------- 40 ---------- 72 ---------- 11
Boilermaker Regional -------- 39 ---------- 72 ---------- 11
Midwest Regional ----------- 42 ---------- 70 ---------- 10
St. Louis Regional ----------- 35 ---------- 70 ---------- 12
Philadelphia Regional -------- 44 ---------- 66 ----------- 9
Palmetto Regional ----------- 34 ---------- 63 ---------- 11
Pittsburgh Regional ---------- 31 ---------- 62 ---------- 12
Bayou Regional ------------- 38 ---------- 60 ----------- 9
WPI Regional --------------- 29 ---------- 58 ---------- 12
Hawaii Regional ------------ 28 ----------- 56 ---------- 12
Utah Regional -------------- 33 ----------- 55 ---------- 10
Waterloo Regional --------- 30 ----------- 55 ---------- 11
*Colorado Regional --------- 41 ------------- 45 ------------ 7 (incomplete)*
*Israel Regional -------------- 55 ------------- 27 ------------ 3 (unusual circumstances)*

despite the fact the numbers dont indicate it, palmetto was a very well run regional. since there were not a large number of teams, teh intentionally made the time between matches longer, in order to make sure that everything ran smoothly.

and ps: only ONE real field delay at palmetto:eek:

Seattle was incredibly efficient, considering the number of rookie and 2nd year teams. The field crew, the queuing areas, the cart paths, the scoring results… it was all very very well run. Big kudos to all the volunteers working there. Everyone was helping everyone.

Not too much excitement on the pit PA system though. Was hoping someone would’ve asked to borrow 469’s robot. :wink:

Interesting stats Mark. Now I see why Barat felt comfortable moving into the FTA position at SBPLI. 48 teams with 11 matches looks pretty darn good.

From the statistics West Michigan looks like it was well done too.

Colorado numbers have been posted finally.


#teams    #matches  matches/team  Match-cycle
41           62         9         08:43.7

Sacramento has also finished Qualifying matches


#teams    #matches  matches/team  Match-cycle
38           76         12         08:05.7

Here are the average combined Qualification & Elimination match scores by event (blue + red alliance score).
Elimination scores were usually much higher of course.
The trend is that later events scored higher than earlier events, especially in the Qualification rounds.
District events where the majority of participants have now played twice really demonstrate this.
Practice makes perfect.

These are just straight scores including penalties. It doesn’t include any of that co-opertition score or extra 5pts for the winners, etc.

-----Avg----Avg
Wk-Qual—Elim ---- Event
4 — 10.3 — 15.2 ---- Troy District
3 ---- 6.5 — 14.7 ---- Silicon Valley Regional
4 ---- 6.8 — 14.5 ---- Los Angeles Regional
4 ---- 6.6 — 13.1 ---- Boston Regional
1 ---- 6.2 — 13.1 ---- Kettering District
3 ---- 8.0 — 12.9 ---- Detroit District
4 ---- 9.0 — 12.8 ---- Philadelphia Regional
2 ---- 4.4 — 12.7 ---- Cass Tech District
4 ---- 9.9 — 12.5 ---- Waterloo Regional
1 ---- 5.6 — 12.5 ---- New Jersey Regional
3 ---- 6.1 — 12.3 ---- Midwest Regional
3 ---- 9.1 — 11.8 ---- West Michigan District
4 ---- 6.0 — 11.8 ---- SBPLI Long Island Regional
1 ---- 5.1 — 11.8 ---- BAE Granite State Regional
3 ---- 4.9 — 11.8 ---- Dallas Regional
5 ---- 6.6 — 11.7 ---- Sacramento Regional
3 ---- 5.6 — 10.9 ---- Virginia Regional
2 ---- 6.5 — 10.7 ---- Florida Regional
4 ---- 6.2 — 10.7 ---- Hawaii Regional
2 ---- 7.0 — 10.6 ---- Wisconsin Regional
2 ---- 5.7 — 10.6 ---- Chesapeake Regional
2 ---- 4.7 — 10.5 ---- Arizona Regional
2 ---- 5.2 — 10.4 ---- Ann Arbor District
3 ---- 7.3 — 10.3 ---- Boilermaker Regional
1 ---- 5.2 — 10.2 ---- Greater Kansas City Regional
2 ---- 7.3 — 10.0 ---- Pittsburgh Regional
1 ---- 5.6 ---- 9.9 ---- Finger Lakes Regional
4 ---- 5.8 ---- 9.7 ---- Buckeye Regional
4 ---- 4.8 ---- 9.7 ---- Oklahoma Regional
4 ---- 4.5 ---- 9.6 ---- Microsoft Seattle Regional
3 ---- 7.4 ---- 9.4 ---- St. Louis Regional
4 ---- 4.3 ---- 9.2 ---- Colorado Regional
4 ---- 5.9 ---- 8.7 ---- Palmetto Regional
2 ---- 3.7 ---- 8.7 ---- New York City Regional
1 ---- 4.5 ---- 8.4 ---- San Diego Regional
1 ---- 3.3 ---- 8.1 ---- Peachtree Regional
1 ---- 4.5 ---- 7.9 ---- Autodesk Oregon Regional
1 ---- 4.4 ---- 7.9 ---- Traverse City District
2 ---- 4.5 ---- 7.8 ---- WPI Regional
3 ---- 4.4 ---- 7.2 ---- Utah Regional
2 ---- 2.6 ---- 6.3 ---- Israel Regional
1 ---- 3.8 ---- 5.7 ---- Washington DC Regional
1 ---- 4.2 ---- 5.3 ---- Bayou Regional

P.S.
If anyone wants to play with the numbers they are linked in my original post. I keep updating it.

In the first 30 matches of the Michigan Championship, the total team score (red + blue, after penalties) has averaged 14.47.

I think that number will go up to…
It will be fun to compare this and other Regionals to the divisions at nationals.

As of 7:31 today,
Average world score per alliance per match for Week 5: 3.88.

And, since I am from a Michigan team,
Average score at the Michigan State championships: 7.97

Michigan State really proved that practice makes perfect. Every team there had at least two prior events under their belt and the Qualification scores were quite high.
I expect we’ll see a bit of this in Atlanta…

Here are the average combined Qualification & Elimination match scores by event (blue + red alliance score).

-----Avg----Avg
Wk-Qual—Elim ---- Event
5 — 16.5 — 24.2 ---- Michigan State Championship
5 ---- 8.6 — 16.1 ---- Greater Toronto Regional
4 — 10.3 — 15.2 ---- Troy District
5 ---- 9.2 — 14.9 ---- Connecticut Regional
3 ---- 6.5 — 14.7 ---- Silicon Valley Regional
4 ---- 6.8 — 14.5 ---- Los Angeles Regional
5 ---- 8.5 — 13.7 ---- Las Vegas Regional
5 ---- 6.7 — 13.3 ---- North Carolina Regional
4 ---- 6.6 — 13.1 ---- Boston Regional
1 ---- 6.2 — 13.1 ---- Kettering District
3 ---- 8.0 — 12.9 ---- Detroit District
4 ---- 9.0 — 12.8 ---- Philadelphia Regional
2 ---- 4.4 — 12.7 ---- Cass Tech District
5 ---- 6.5 — 12.7 ---- Minnesota 10000 Lakes Regional
4 ---- 9.9 — 12.5 ---- Waterloo Regional
5 ---- 4.9 — 12.5 ---- Minnesota North Star Regional
1 ---- 5.6 — 12.5 ---- New Jersey Regional
3 ---- 6.1 — 12.3 ---- Midwest Regional
5 ---- 4.7 — 12.1 ---- Lone Star Regional
3 ---- 9.1 — 11.8 ---- West Michigan District
4 ---- 6.0 — 11.8 ---- SBPLI Long Island Regional
1 ---- 5.1 — 11.8 ---- BAE Granite State Regional
3 ---- 4.9 — 11.8 ---- Dallas Regional
5 ---- 6.6 — 11.7 ---- Sacramento Regional
3 ---- 5.6 — 10.9 ---- Virginia Regional
2 ---- 6.5 — 10.7 ---- Florida Regional
4 ---- 6.2 — 10.7 ---- Hawaii Regional
2 ---- 7.0 — 10.6 ---- Wisconsin Regional
2 ---- 5.7 — 10.6 ---- Chesapeake Regional
2 ---- 4.7 — 10.5 ---- Arizona Regional
2 ---- 5.2 — 10.4 ---- Ann Arbor District
3 ---- 7.3 — 10.3 ---- Boilermaker Regional
1 ---- 5.2 — 10.2 ---- Greater Kansas City Regional
2 ---- 7.3 — 10.0 ---- Pittsburgh Regional
1 ---- 5.6 ---- 9.9 ---- Finger Lakes Regional
4 ---- 4.8 ---- 9.7 ---- Oklahoma Regional
4 ---- 5.8 ---- 9.7 ---- Buckeye Regional
4 ---- 4.5 ---- 9.6 ---- Microsoft Seattle Regional
3 ---- 7.4 ---- 9.4 ---- St. Louis Regional
4 ---- 4.3 ---- 9.2 ---- Colorado Regional
4 ---- 5.9 ---- 8.7 ---- Palmetto Regional
2 ---- 3.7 ---- 8.7 ---- New York City Regional
1 ---- 4.5 ---- 8.4 ---- San Diego Regional
1 ---- 3.3 ---- 8.1 ---- Peachtree Regional
1 ---- 4.5 ---- 7.9 ---- Autodesk Oregon Regional
1 ---- 4.4 ---- 7.9 ---- Traverse City District
2 ---- 4.5 ---- 7.8 ---- WPI Regional
3 ---- 4.4 ---- 7.2 ---- Utah Regional
2 ---- 2.6 ---- 6.3 ---- Israel Regional
1 ---- 3.8 ---- 5.7 ---- Washington DC Regional
1 ---- 4.2 ---- 5.3 ---- Bayou Regional

Week 5 field performance results including all previous weeks.
So you can brag about how good your field crews were.
Seattle’s record was tied by the crew working the Minnesota North Star Regional, while across the street lagged by 30 seconds per match.

Michigan was a trial version of how Championship Divisions will be run with Quals beginning on Thursday afternoon.

# ------ total ----- Matches - Avg match
teams - matches - team ---- cycle -------- Event
48 ----- 80 --------- 10 — 0:07:45 ---- Overall Averages

64 ------ 96 ---------- 9 ---- 0:06:10 ---- Microsoft Seattle Regional
63 ------ 95 ---------- 9 ---- 0:06:10 ---- Minnesota North Star Regional
35 ------ 70 --------- 12 ---- 0:06:28 ---- St. Louis Regional
44 ------ 66 ---------- 9 ---- 0:06:29 ---- Philadelphia Regional
44 ------ 77 --------- 11 ---- 0:06:33 ---- Las Vegas Regional
50 ------ 84 --------- 10 ---- 0:06:44 ---- Silicon Valley Regional
58 ------ 97 --------- 10 ---- 0:06:47 ---- Los Angeles Regional
63 ------ 95 ---------- 9 ---- 0:06:49 ---- Minnesota 10000 Lakes Regional
61 ------ 92 ---------- 9 ---- 0:06:53 ---- Autodesk Oregon Regional
55 ------ 94 --------- 10 ---- 0:06:55 ---- Connecticut Regional
48 ------ 88 --------- 11 ---- 0:06:56 ---- SBPLI Long Island Regional
66 ------ 99 ---------- 9 ---- 0:06:57 ---- Lone Star Regional
52 ------ 87 --------- 10 ---- 0:06:57 ---- Greater Toronto Regional
55 ------ 92 --------- 10 ---- 0:06:59 ---- Oklahoma Regional
53 ------ 78 ---------- 9 ---- 0:07:03 ---- Dallas Regional
60 ------ 99 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:07 ---- Greater Kansas City Regional
40 ------ 80 --------- 12 ---- 0:07:09 ---- Troy District
50 ------ 82 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:11 ---- Peachtree Regional
53 ------ 80 ---------- 9 ---- 0:07:13 ---- Boston Regional
50 ------ 92 --------- 11 ---- 0:07:13 ---- Chesapeake Regional
50 ------ 84 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:14 ---- Wisconsin Regional
44 ------ 66 ---------- 9 ---- 0:07:21 ---- North Carolina Regional
41 ------ 82 --------- 12 ---- 0:07:22 ---- West Michigan District
28 ------ 56 --------- 12 ---- 0:07:22 ---- Hawaii Regional
60 ------ 90 ---------- 9 ---- 0:07:26 ---- Buckeye Regional
63 ----- 130 --------- 12 ---- 0:07:30 ---- Michigan State Championship
61 ------ 92 ---------- 9 ---- 0:07:33 ---- New Jersey Regional
39 ------ 72 --------- 11 ---- 0:07:34 ---- Boilermaker Regional
30 ------ 55 --------- 11 ---- 0:07:35 ---- Waterloo Regional
48 ------ 80 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:38 ---- BAE Granite State Regional
56 ------ 94 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:40 ---- Arizona Regional
44 ------ 74 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:41 ---- Finger Lakes Regional
42 ------ 70 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:46 ---- Midwest Regional
29 ------ 58 --------- 12 ---- 0:07:48 ---- WPI Regional
53 ------ 89 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:48 ---- Florida Regional
31 ------ 62 --------- 12 ---- 0:07:55 ---- Pittsburgh Regional
49 ------ 82 --------- 10 ---- 0:07:58 ---- San Diego Regional
59 ------ 89 ---------- 9 ---- 0:07:59 ---- Washington DC Regional
40 ------ 80 --------- 12 ---- 0:08:00 ---- Ann Arbor District
38 ------ 76 --------- 12 ---- 0:08:06 ---- Sacramento Regional
34 ------ 63 --------- 11 ---- 0:08:42 ---- Palmetto Regional
41 ------ 62 ---------- 9 ---- 0:08:44 ---- Colorado Regional
38 ------ 76 --------- 12 ---- 0:08:49 ---- Detroit District
64 ------ 84 ---------- 8 ---- 0:09:02 ---- New York City Regional
38 ------ 60 ---------- 9 ---- 0:09:03 ---- Bayou Regional
33 ------ 55 --------- 10 ---- 0:09:03 ---- Utah Regional
38 ------ 76 --------- 12 ---- 0:09:09 ---- Traverse City District
40 ------ 72 --------- 11 ---- 0:09:36 ---- Cass Tech District
40 ------ 74 --------- 11 ---- 0:09:49 ---- Kettering District
63 ------ 82 ---------- 8 ---- 0:10:34 ---- Virginia Regional
55 ------ 27 ---------- 3 ---- 0:12:55 ---- Israel Regional

Better late than never, here’s my update including weeks 4 and 5:

Week—Event----------------------Session 0--Session 1--Session 2--Session 3--Overall
4---Seattle--------------------------------06:48.46---06:04.86---05:42.00---06:09.68
3---St. Louis Regional---------------------06:46.36---06:31.11---06:00.00---06:27.76
4---Philadelphia---------------------------06:38.82---06:06.43---06:53.33---06:28.57
5---Las Vegas------------------------------06:46.36---06:39.38---06:09.00---06:33.24
5---Minnesota North Star-------------------07:08.28---06:08.57---06:30.00---06:33.91
5---Minnesota 10k Lakes--------------------06:40.00---06:46.29---06:24.00---06:37.17
3---Silicon Valley Regional----------------06:57.27---06:34.55---06:43.85---06:43.70
4---Los Angeles----------------------------07:05.00---06:52.50---06:26.00---06:47.23
4---Connecticut----------------------------07:27.27---06:41.86---06:34.62---06:50.77
5---Lone Star------------------------------07:08.28---06:22.11---07:16.55---06:52.50
4---Long Island----------------------------07:32.50---06:08.82---07:22.22---06:55.76
1---Autodesk Oregon Regional---------------07:27.50---06:58.29---06:36.00---06:58.65
4---Oklahoma Regional----------------------07:47.14---06:56.47---06:13.33---06:59.33
3---Dallas Regional------------------------09:08.57---06:46.67---06:16.80---07:03.20
1---Greater Kansas City -------------------07:24.00---07:12.86---06:45.52---07:07.50
4---FIM Troy-------------------------------07:00.00---07:18.33---07:00.00---07:08.57
1---Peachtree Regional---------------------07:56.47---07:30.00---06:10.00---07:11.39
4---Boston---------------------------------07:48.00---07:00.00---07:02.61---07:13.25
2---Chesapeake Regional--------------------07:45.71---06:50.00---07:25.38---07:13.48
2---Wisconsin Regional---------------------08:22.86---06:51.67---06:47.50---07:14.07
4---North Carolina*------------------------07:33.00---07:16.80---07:14.12---07:21.29
3---FIM Western Michigan-------------------07:00.00---07:41.43---07:00.00---07:22.03
5---Greater Toronto------------------------07:16.00---07:53.57---06:55.38---07:22.14
2---Arizona Regional-----------------------10:06.32---07:36.00---05:45.00---07:28.35
5---FIM Michigan State Champs---08:22.76---06:47.59---06:53.68---08:06.00---07:30.00
4---Buckeye--------------------------------09:42.50---07:00.00---06:23.64---07:31.03
3---Boilermaker Regional-------------------07:24.00---07:30.00---07:50.53---07:33.91
4---Waterloo-------------------------------07:14.12---07:20.00---08:21.43---07:34.62
1---BAE Systems Granite State--------------08:51.43---07:05.63---07:17.50---07:38.18
1---New Jersey Regional--------------------10:00.00---07:20.00---07:01.71---07:38.18
1---Finger Lakes Regional------------------07:27.00---08:33.10---06:46.36---07:41.41
3---Midwest Regional-----------------------10:10.59---07:01.82---06:45.88---07:45.67
1---Washington DC Regional-----------------10:03.75---07:38.05---06:45.52---07:47.44
2---Florida Regional-----------------------09:06.32---06:38.05---08:41.54---07:48.14
2---WPI Regional---------------------------07:36.67---08:02.86---07:48.75---07:50.18
4---Hawaii---------------------------------09:04.29---07:36.52---07:18.75---07:54.34
2---Pittsburgh Regional--------------------09:30.00---07:35.56---07:53.08---07:54.92
2---San Diego Regional --------------------09:40.00---07:24.32---07:32.50---07:57.72
5---Sacramento-----------------------------07:54.78---08:12.41---08:54.29---08:18.90
2---FIM Ann Arbor--------------------------10:21.82---08:04.62---08:11.11---08:26.49
4---Palmetto-------------------------------08:03.75---08:06.67---10:14.12---08:42.00
3---Virginia Regional----------------------07:24.00---08:57.50---08:47.27---08:43.52
4---Colorado-------------------------------09:35.29---08:25.38---08:18.75---08:43.73
3---FIM Detroit----------------------------08:55.71---08:15.88---09:31.20---08:49.32
2---New York City Regional-----------------10:28.42---08:50.63---08:20.00---09:02.22
1---Bayou Regional-------------------------10:55.71---08:27.86---08:26.25---09:03.10
3---Utah Regional--------------------------10:52.00---08:18.26---08:21.43---09:03.46
1---FIM Traverse City----------------------10:25.00---09:37.50---08:06.21---09:09.04
2---FIM Cass Tech--------------------------10:33.33---09:43.64---09:06.67---09:35.65
1---FIM Kettering University---------------13:30.00---09:34.55---09:22.50---09:49.01
2---Israel Regional------------------------21:24.00---15:00.00--------------17:22.22

X---Overall---------------------08:22.76---08:40.71---07:36.61---07:23.38---07:50.14

X---Overall (except Israel)----------------08:25.44---07:27.74---07:23.38---07:38.70

To keep the naming conventions consistent, I’ve dubbed the Thursday afternoon session at the Michigan State Championships as Session 0.

There was an anomaly in the North Carolina data in which match 23 shows a start time two hours after the last other match concluded Friday. I’ve given them the benefit of the doubt and discounted it from the averages, but I’m very curious as to the story there.

On the whole, the week 4 and 5 regionals put on a very strong performance, in terms of turnaround time. Troy District turned in another precision performance with every reset at 7 or 8 minutes. Seattle broke Arizona’s half-day record by 3 seconds per match on Saturday morning, those regionals being the only two to maintain an average below 6 minutes for an entire session.

Thanks to all the queuing and field crews across the country who have done their best to keep things moving. Good luck Atlanta volunteers!

I’d guess that it was a replay, caused by a field fault, and run at the very end of the day on Friday to keep everything else on schedule. Good idea to not count it.

All Championship fields had:

  • 86 teams
  • 144 total matches
  • 10 matches per team
    Don’t know what the target match turn-around times were, so can’t say how close to the target each of the fields was.

------------ Avg match ---- Avg Qual ---- Avg Elim
Field --------- cycle --------- Score ------ Score

Archimedes - 0:06:24.9 -------- 15.6 -------- 25.8
Curie -------- 0:06:16.4 -------- 14.6 -------- 24.1
Galileo ------ 0:06:12.0 -------- 13.8 -------- 22.8
Newton ----- 0:06:00.0 -------- 13.0 -------- 25.9

Einstein ----- 0:18:40.0--------- n/a -------- 29.3

The average elimination score for all fields is on a par with the Michigan State event, so it seems this represents the optimum scores that can be expected from *Breakaway! *after teams have gained experience at a couple of regional/district events.

I think you spelled Einstein wrong.

Thanks

Per session cycle times for Championships, where 0 is Thursday night, 1 is Friday morning, and so on:

Session......0........1........2........3
Archimedes...0:06:21..0:06:13..0:06:18..0:06:35
Curie........0:06:28..0:05:46..0:06:20..0:06:06
Galileo......0:06:08..0:06:00..0:06:06..0:06:22
Newton.......0:05:58..0:05:39..0:06:04..0:06:02

I took a look at the match schedule on Thursday before most had run, and it appeared they were targeting 6 minute turnaround.

One last note…
I related this year’s event match turnaround and scores with previous year’s.
A jump in #matches offered to teams while the # teams per event has stayed fairly constant. Championship match cycles are understandably lower, since everyone (drive teams, field staff) have experience in the new yearly game. Einstein scores are typically much higher than those seen at early events.

Scores are per Alliance.


**Regional/District Averages**
                           **2008               2009             2010**
Teams per event             46                 49               48
Total matches               71                 71               80
Matches per team             9                  9               10
Avg. Match turnaround     6:40               7:21             7:45
Avg. Qualifying score     36.1               52.4              3.1
Avg. Elimination score    48.6               52.8              5.6
 
 
**Championship Averages**
                           **2008               2009             2010**
Teams per Division          85                 87               86
Total matches              100                102              144
Matches per team             7                  7               10
Avg. Match turnaround     5:58               6:13             6:13
Avg. Qualifying score     67.3               71.4              7.1
Avg. Einstein score      101.6               72.4             14.6

It looks like you used the average single-alliance score for all data points but Einstein in 2010, where it looks like you used the sum of both alliances.