Will be updating this live as alliance selections and elims go on.
Archimedes (might not have declines due to lack of audio on stream):
2415 987 2959 F 2. 33 469 1519 W
2468 254 11 SF
868 2590 71 QF
126 3310 1756 SF
948 20 973 QF
3467 379 365 QF
4450 1334 1660 QF
First 3 Backups: 3314, 236, 3145
Curie: 1. 1678 148 862 W SF F SF QF QF QF QF
First 3 Backups: 1138,2936, 2145
1717 decline 1678
Galileo:
118 1114 4039 SF
2169 3284 2175 SF
1425 2474 2337 F
2630 111 3641 QF 5. 1241 1477 610 W
3656 1806 4334 QF
2338 2512 1323 QF
245 1732 27 QF
First 3 backups: 4069, 295, 2729
Newton:
1538 1986 217 F
128 195 1676 SF 3. 303 3476 1640 W
3997 829 1741 SF
341 68 2826 QF
2252 1718 141 QF
2052 2054 225 QF
1569 175 190 QF
341 declines 128
First 3 backups: 2439, 1985, 1311
Einstein :
**Galileo: 1241 1477 610 Winners in 3 matches **
Finals:
This will be the most intense selections in a very long time. When will teams that were thought to be top tier but fell below 8th be selected? It begins!
1678 just broke up EVERYONE on Curie.
Gregor
April 27, 2013, 11:46am
4
1678 majorly scorched Curie.
1717, 2056, 1310, and 359 declined.
Is the Archimedes’ stream broken for anyone else?
And wow, what happened on Curie is crazy.
Gregor:
Archimedes.
Thanks. Has 2468 been shooting for threes or twos? They’ll probably be deadly with 254 if not blocked.
The NASA stream of Archimedes works…except no audio.
1756 on Arch 5
I think the mass of declines will seal the Curie Curse for this year. All the top teams were prevented from joining. In curie, the 8 8
Okay so it’s not just me that doesn’t have audio.
Definitely…Curie had a great chance…but all the declines
3’s. And they are darn good at it.
I am genuinely scared at all of these alliances. Holy crap.
AmoryG
April 27, 2013, 12:09pm
14
It’s crazy 610 was picked 5th to last and 125 wasn’t picked at all on Galileo… just to name a couple I’m sure there are many other teams that were undervalued or snubbed.
Just because Curie was broken up didn’t mean they got bad picks. I still don’t think Curie can compete with Archenemies though.
The breaking up probably made 4814’s day and gave them a real chance for the finals. I’m not sure why 1717 declined, but the other declines made sense to me. I would not be surprised in 4814, 67 and 1918 come out on top in this division.
I agree; Curie is still full of great alliances. But to compete with the other divisions, those teamups needed to happen.
system
April 27, 2013, 12:16pm
17
It did seem odd, but then again I am biased
dm224a
April 27, 2013, 12:17pm
18
Yeah, i’m not getting it very well at all.
Jeffy
April 27, 2013, 12:17pm
19
25 didn’t get picked?
They showed a 20 pt climb with dump and capable 3 disk auton. Also, they played on Einstein in '11 and '12.
I’m amazed at how many alliances are 3-10pt climbers. Not a smart decision if you ask me. (preparing to eat my words)
Also, 2169’s alliance is funny. It’s made up of them and two strong blockers.
Will be updating this live as alliance selections go on.
Archimedes(might not have declines due to lack of audio on stream):
2415 987 2959
33 469 1519
2468 254 11
868 2590 71
126 3310 1756(?)
948 20 973
3467 379 365
4450 1334 1660(not sure)
First 3 Backups: 3314, 236, 3145
1678 148 862
1983 3539 2996
4814 67 1918
2056 967 3990
1310 3824 1684
1717 234 135
359 233 16
4565 103 2168
First 3 Backups: 1138,2936, 2145
1717 decline 1678
Galileo:
118 1114 4039
2169 3284 2175
1425 2474 2337
2630 111 3641
1241 1477 610
3656 1806 4334
2338 2512 1323
245 1732 27
First 3 backups: 4069, 295, 2729
Newton:
1538 1986 217
128 195 1676
303 3476 1640
3997 829 1741
341 68 2826
2252 1718 141
2052 2054 225
1569 175 190
341 declines 128
First 3 backups: 2439, 1985, 1311
Small correction in bold.
