With the Mt. Olive district almost full, I figured I’d start a thread to see who else plans on attending during week 1. I’ve highlighted the teams who I personally predict will be the main contenders, based on prior performance. This should be a decently competitive week 1 event for districts.
I did say I’d visit Hatboro Horsham Week 1…but with the Pi-oneers and most of the tough and friendly usuals coming here…I just might have to ask 1370 for a ride up for the weekend
MO definitely looks to be the best competition yet as the event heads into its third year. On a side note, we’ll see if 222 can keep up their winning streak
Looking at last year’s events, the only competition they had in common was the MAR Championships in Lehigh. They didn’t go to any of the same districts.
But, the 222, 223, 224, and 225 all in MAR do get confusing after a while :eek:
EDIT: After some more investigation (should I be doing school work…?), 222 and 225 in PA are also 2+ hours away from one another, with 225 being closer to Philly, while 222 and 224 in NJ being relatively closer, with them being just under an hour away from each other.
Last year at MAR Championships we had the beautiful quad-fecta of 222-225 in the pits. We’ve actually never been to the same event as 222 (barring MAR Championships) since Philly 2009.
Haha Will, I keep more tabs on most of the MAR teams than you might think.
I had heard about some ‘restructuring’ 1370 went through over the summer/fall, so I didn’t guess where that might leave 1370 in terms of performance or who went to the new team.
Of course, if you continue to improve at your current rate, I could see 1370 as an alliance captain earlier in the season. Last year’s performance tells me that it took your first event to work out the bugs and some iteration to be on point by the second event, as well as MAR champs. By contenders, I meant teams who were most likely to seed in the top 8 in week 1.
I also really like the shift to Week 1 as we’ll now get to see even more MAR teams play right off the bat, whereas some teams didn’t even play until Week 4 last year (as with the case with us in terms of MAR)
I don’t understand why you felt the need to call out certain teams as being “contenders.” What you’re essentially doing is pointing out not only the good teams, but the not-so great teams too. What’s worse is that it’s your own opinion too, not a quantifiable metric (such as OPR).
It left a sour taste in my mouth, and I’m not even one of the unbolded (or bolded) teams. I wouldn’t want to be seeing this as a team member, seeing “oh, a well respected FRC mentor thinks my team sucks.”
I’m sure you didn’t mean to come off that way, but you did. I just think it was unnecessary. Everyone knows who the top teams are, no need to point it out.
I wrote “main contenders,” implying most likely to be within the top 8 seeded team. As mentioned, my metric was “prior performance.” I have seen all of these teams in person, so OPR would not really reflect what I have seen and what I know about each team’s history, resources, and background - as well as what I know about the people involved with each team.
Seeing as how I am friends with most of the members and mentors of the teams within MAR, I don’t think they would read my post as you did, because they know me quite well - such as Will from 1370.
If you would like to continue that discussion, feel free to PM me; however, I will not edit my original post since it is my personal prediction.
Looking forward to having you up here bud! Try to get a little sleep though
I wouldn’t worry about a main competitor designation… with only 28 in the list so far, almost all of them make the eliminations! EVERYBODY’S GOT A CHANCE ITS MARCH MADNESS UP IN HERE YEAHHHHHHH.
Wait, what were we talking about 5 months before a competition?
I’m hoping to see more of those teams return for this year. The more teams we have competing during week 1, the more time they’ll have to iterate for their second or third event! = even better competitions in later weeks!
