2019 Detroit Ranking Projections

Well, here we go. Below are the ranking projections for the Detroit divisions ignoring the prelim schedules. Basically what the rankings would look like under 1000 alternative hypothetical schedules. Sample error will be <3.5% with 1000 simulations:

Archimedes
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
5460 6.2 24% 58% 78% 87% 90%
910 7.0 16% 51% 74% 84% 89%
5687 8.6 11% 40% 65% 78% 84%
2481 9.0 11% 40% 62% 76% 83%
930 9.2 10% 39% 61% 75% 81%
33 9.9 8% 32% 57% 73% 80%
5406 15.3 2% 15% 37% 53% 62%
2054 16.4 3% 15% 32% 47% 55%
222 17.0 2% 13% 31% 44% 54%
1325 18.4 3% 13% 29% 43% 51%
2826 20.8 1% 8% 20% 32% 41%
3015 21.0 <1% 6% 20% 32% 43%
188 22.1 <1% 6% 19% 31% 40%
4678 24.6 <1% 5% 14% 23% 33%
4776 24.8 <1% 4% 13% 23% 33%
5676 26.4 <1% 5% 13% 23% 30%
509 27.1 1% 5% 13% 21% 28%
1025 27.2 <1% 3% 10% 18% 26%
5927 27.6 <1% 5% 11% 19% 26%
1310 28.0 <1% 2% 9% 17% 24%
4391 28.6 <1% 3% 9% 17% 22%
1720 29.1 <1% 2% 8% 18% 23%
5216 29.3 <1% 2% 6% 14% 20%
4976 29.4 <1% 3% 8% 16% 22%
2577 30.2 <1% 2% 8% 14% 21%
6591 30.4 <1% 2% 8% 14% 20%
3688 30.5 <1% 2% 9% 16% 22%
4004 32.3 <1% 2% 6% 13% 19%
614 32.5 <1% 1% 5% 12% 16%
2539 32.6 <1% <1% 4% 10% 16%
2231 32.8 <1% <1% 4% 11% 15%
141 33.0 <1% 2% 6% 12% 16%
5404 33.5 <1% <1% 5% 10% 15%
384 33.7 <1% <1% 3% 9% 15%
4325 34.1 <1% <1% 4% 9% 15%
3928 34.3 <1% 1% 4% 8% 14%
1937 34.7 <1% <1% 4% 9% 12%
1640 35.8 <1% <1% 4% 8% 13%
6802 36.3 <1% <1% 3% 7% 11%
5860 36.6 <1% <1% 3% 7% 11%
3534 37.0 <1% <1% 3% 8% 12%
2852 37.4 <1% <1% 3% 7% 11%
3996 37.9 <1% <1% 2% 7% 10%
2526 38.3 <1% <1% 3% 5% 9%
1403 38.7 <1% <1% 2% 5% 8%
1188 40.1 <1% <1% 2% 5% 7%
1322 40.1 <1% <1% <1% 4% 7%
7617 40.4 <1% <1% 2% 3% 6%
4956 41.3 <1% <1% 1% 4% 6%
3770 41.4 <1% <1% <1% 3% 5%
4150 42.8 <1% <1% 1% 3% 5%
4311 43.0 <1% <1% <1% 3% 5%
3184 44.5 <1% <1% <1% 2% 5%
6032 45.5 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
4027 46.6 <1% <1% <1% 2% 2%
271 48.5 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
2077 50.4 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
5512 51.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
564 52.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
7605 53.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
6317 54.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2708 55.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7741 55.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7858 56.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7589 57.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7650 57.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
1660 58.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
4707 63.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
Carson
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
1796 4.9 33% 69% 83% 91% 94%
870 8.2 15% 46% 67% 78% 84%
3683 12.0 9% 31% 51% 65% 72%
5050 12.5 8% 27% 47% 62% 70%
234 13.9 5% 23% 44% 57% 66%
4362 15.7 5% 19% 36% 51% 60%
67 17.0 2% 15% 31% 45% 55%
1768 17.9 3% 17% 32% 44% 53%
3452 19.6 3% 12% 25% 35% 44%
1305 19.9 2% 10% 24% 35% 45%
5172 20.1 1% 9% 25% 36% 46%
747 20.4 1% 8% 22% 34% 44%
85 21.6 <1% 10% 21% 32% 41%
2137 22.6 <1% 8% 19% 30% 40%
2386 22.6 <1% 8% 18% 29% 37%
3314 23.6 1% 6% 16% 28% 34%
111 24.6 1% 7% 15% 26% 33%
3536 24.6 1% 6% 14% 25% 33%
7160 24.8 1% 7% 16% 26% 33%
619 25.0 1% 5% 15% 24% 31%
2370 25.2 <1% 5% 14% 22% 31%
2052 26.6 <1% 3% 12% 20% 27%
5712 26.9 <1% 5% 10% 18% 24%
876 26.9 <1% 4% 11% 19% 28%
5883 27.4 <1% 3% 10% 18% 24%
1481 27.5 <1% 3% 10% 18% 24%
3750 27.8 <1% 4% 9% 17% 24%
2590 28.9 <1% 3% 9% 18% 23%
5436 30.1 <1% 3% 9% 17% 22%
4930 30.2 <1% 2% 6% 12% 17%
3003 30.8 <1% 3% 8% 14% 19%
2960 31.7 <1% 2% 6% 12% 17%
829 31.7 <1% 1% 6% 11% 18%
1816 32.5 <1% 1% 6% 12% 16%
2549 32.9 <1% 2% 7% 12% 17%
3467 33.6 <1% 2% 5% 10% 14%
4256 34.8 <1% 2% 4% 9% 12%
4342 34.8 <1% 1% 5% 9% 13%
66 36.4 <1% 1% 5% 10% 14%
5587 36.7 <1% <1% 3% 7% 11%
4607 37.9 <1% 1% 4% 7% 11%
2220 39.1 <1% 1% 3% 6% 9%
1468 39.6 <1% 1% 3% 5% 9%
7769 40.7 <1% <1% 2% 4% 7%
4472 41.7 <1% <1% 2% 5% 7%
3386 41.8 <1% <1% 2% 4% 6%
1076 41.9 <1% <1% 2% 5% 7%
7656 42.1 <1% <1% 1% 4% 6%
3504 43.0 <1% <1% 2% 3% 5%
201 46.1 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
2559 46.1 <1% <1% 1% 2% 4%
123 46.7 <1% <1% 1% 2% 3%
2096 47.1 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
2723 48.1 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
293 50.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
7432 51.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
537 51.4 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
45 51.5 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
3985 51.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7785 51.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
3082 52.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5243 52.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7048 53.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5690 54.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
3277 57.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
6911 58.7 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7400 60.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7608 62.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
Curie
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
2056 3.4 38% 78% 92% 96% 98%
987 7.8 11% 44% 68% 82% 87%
3538 9.1 9% 37% 62% 76% 83%
2851 9.3 9% 37% 59% 75% 82%
1114 9.5 7% 33% 57% 72% 80%
195 10.5 9% 31% 55% 70% 78%
2767 12.3 4% 21% 44% 61% 70%
230 16.7 1% 11% 28% 45% 54%
78 18.0 1% 10% 25% 40% 50%
303 18.1 2% 11% 26% 40% 51%
2607 18.2 1% 8% 24% 39% 50%
1807 18.6 1% 8% 23% 39% 49%
1519 18.7 1% 9% 24% 38% 48%
1241 19.2 2% 9% 25% 38% 46%
20 19.7 1% 9% 22% 36% 46%
1684 21.9 <1% 5% 16% 29% 38%
302 22.8 <1% 5% 14% 27% 36%
177 22.8 <1% 4% 14% 27% 37%
1023 27.0 <1% 3% 8% 16% 24%
226 28.7 <1% 2% 8% 15% 23%
401 29.4 <1% 1% 7% 13% 20%
3656 29.6 <1% 3% 6% 13% 21%
7553 29.9 <1% 1% 6% 13% 19%
4028 30.7 <1% 1% 5% 11% 17%
237 30.9 <1% 2% 7% 13% 18%
56 30.9 <1% 2% 5% 10% 16%
107 31.5 <1% 1% 6% 11% 16%
5530 31.5 <1% 1% 6% 12% 16%
48 32.1 <1% <1% 5% 12% 17%
461 32.1 <1% 1% 4% 12% 16%
173 32.3 <1% 1% 4% 8% 14%
1610 33.0 <1% 1% 4% 9% 13%
2834 33.5 <1% 1% 3% 8% 14%
3211 33.9 <1% <1% 3% 8% 11%
3655 34.2 <1% 1% 4% 9% 14%
1360 34.7 <1% 1% 4% 8% 12%
4213 35.6 <1% <1% 4% 8% 12%
494 36.3 <1% <1% 2% 6% 10%
1501 36.4 <1% <1% 2% 5% 9%
329 37.0 <1% <1% 2% 5% 8%
1756 37.1 <1% <1% 2% 5% 10%
6090 37.1 <1% <1% 2% 5% 8%
3102 38.5 <1% <1% 2% 6% 9%
967 39.4 <1% <1% 2% 5% 8%
1073 40.1 <1% <1% 2% 4% 6%
3339 41.1 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
11 42.0 <1% <1% 2% 3% 5%
126 42.6 <1% <1% <1% 3% 5%
314 44.1 <1% <1% 1% 3% 4%
2998 45.2 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
193 46.2 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
5509 46.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
5847 47.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
5672 48.6 <1% <1% <1% 2% 2%
4296 50.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
7539 50.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
4285 51.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
5987 51.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
3654 52.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7886 52.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5914 52.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
279 53.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5865 53.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7598 53.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2224 54.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7590 58.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7515 61.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
Daly
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
133 6.8 19% 53% 73% 84% 87%
2075 7.2 14% 46% 71% 84% 90%
1718 7.4 18% 49% 71% 82% 87%
340 8.4 12% 42% 65% 78% 85%
3641 10.1 7% 29% 53% 70% 78%
319 11.0 10% 32% 53% 68% 75%
2200 14.3 3% 18% 36% 53% 63%
176 16.5 2% 13% 30% 45% 56%
1885 17.7 2% 11% 27% 43% 53%
4946 17.9 2% 13% 28% 44% 53%
4680 18.9 1% 8% 22% 36% 47%
1506 19.8 <1% 7% 20% 33% 42%
172 21.0 <1% 6% 19% 32% 40%
1418 21.0 1% 8% 20% 33% 42%
2611 22.0 <1% 5% 16% 28% 39%
694 22.1 1% 6% 15% 28% 38%
2619 22.5 1% 8% 18% 30% 39%
1922 23.4 <1% 4% 14% 25% 35%
862 24.5 <1% 5% 14% 24% 33%
4003 25.6 <1% 4% 12% 22% 28%
4039 26.5 <1% 3% 9% 18% 26%
3075 28.7 <1% 2% 8% 17% 23%
120 29.5 <1% 3% 11% 17% 23%
3990 29.7 <1% 2% 7% 15% 21%
4970 30.0 <1% 2% 7% 13% 20%
2702 30.9 <1% 2% 6% 12% 17%
3414 30.9 <1% 1% 6% 12% 18%
223 31.3 <1% 2% 7% 13% 17%
2883 31.4 <1% 1% 5% 11% 17%
5926 31.7 <1% 1% 5% 12% 16%
4728 31.8 <1% <1% 4% 10% 15%
4903 32.1 <1% 2% 5% 12% 17%
1729 33.0 <1% 2% 5% 10% 15%
4130 34.3 <1% 1% 3% 7% 11%
2994 34.5 <1% <1% 3% 8% 12%
558 34.9 <1% 2% 5% 9% 13%
1574 35.3 <1% <1% 3% 6% 11%
7491 37.0 <1% <1% 2% 6% 10%
2638 37.4 <1% <1% 3% 6% 11%
4593 38.2 <1% <1% 3% 5% 9%
4096 38.4 <1% 1% 3% 5% 8%
2062 39.4 <1% <1% 2% 5% 8%
6237 40.2 <1% <1% 1% 3% 5%
4525 40.5 <1% <1% 2% 4% 6%
6088 41.8 <1% <1% 2% 3% 5%
5724 42.3 <1% <1% <1% 3% 5%
4541 43.0 <1% <1% 1% 3% 5%
1091 45.4 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
6016 45.7 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
453 46.3 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
5125 47.4 <1% <1% 1% 2% 3%
1787 47.5 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
2614 48.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
7523 48.7 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
6024 48.9 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
3630 50.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
3550 50.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
7645 51.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
7417 51.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
2869 53.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5740 53.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2202 53.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
6455 53.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
3193 53.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2673 53.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2957 54.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
7797 55.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7530 59.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
Darwin
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
1918 5.5 27% 61% 81% 89% 93%
2791 7.1 18% 48% 72% 84% 89%
1690 8.8 12% 40% 62% 76% 83%
125 9.8 8% 35% 57% 72% 80%
868 10.0 10% 35% 60% 71% 79%
3707 13.9 3% 20% 41% 56% 66%
16 14.2 3% 18% 38% 55% 64%
225 14.8 4% 21% 39% 54% 61%
245 16.9 1% 12% 29% 46% 56%
1676 18.0 2% 12% 28% 42% 51%
217 18.3 1% 12% 26% 40% 50%
103 21.7 1% 7% 18% 29% 39%
1923 22.0 1% 7% 20% 31% 39%
1058 22.3 1% 7% 18% 29% 38%
365 22.6 <1% 6% 18% 29% 37%
836 23.6 <1% 5% 15% 24% 33%
2337 24.2 <1% 4% 12% 23% 31%
503 24.8 <1% 5% 12% 21% 31%
1218 25.0 <1% 4% 12% 24% 31%
3555 26.1 <1% 4% 11% 20% 26%
3146 26.2 <1% 4% 12% 20% 29%
3667 26.4 <1% 3% 10% 18% 24%
3604 26.5 <1% 2% 9% 19% 25%
51 27.2 <1% 3% 8% 18% 26%
4143 28.4 <1% 3% 8% 16% 23%
4481 28.9 <1% 2% 7% 15% 22%
3542 29.1 <1% 2% 8% 14% 21%
449 29.4 <1% 1% 8% 15% 20%
88 29.8 <1% 3% 8% 14% 20%
190 30.2 <1% 2% 7% 13% 19%
4253 31.7 <1% 1% 4% 10% 15%
5567 32.7 <1% 1% 4% 9% 14%
2502 32.8 <1% <1% 4% 10% 15%
1792 34.1 <1% <1% 5% 9% 15%
5084 34.2 <1% 1% 4% 9% 13%
2771 35.0 <1% 1% 4% 8% 13%
5951 35.5 <1% 1% 4% 8% 11%
772 36.5 <1% 1% 4% 7% 11%
4381 37.6 <1% <1% 2% 5% 9%
5501 37.7 <1% <1% 2% 6% 9%
5348 37.9 <1% <1% 2% 6% 9%
1781 39.2 <1% <1% <1% 4% 5%
6806 39.3 <1% <1% 2% 5% 9%
3926 39.3 <1% <1% 1% 4% 6%
1024 40.3 <1% <1% 2% 5% 7%
5811 43.6 <1% <1% <1% 3% 4%
2500 43.9 <1% <1% 1% 3% 5%
2830 44.3 <1% <1% 1% 2% 3%
250 46.1 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
236 46.9 <1% <1% <1% 2% 2%
6401 47.3 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
3044 47.4 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
7480 48.6 <1% <1% <1% 2% 2%
3381 49.1 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
3618 49.4 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
3624 49.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
771 51.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
175 51.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
1317 51.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
5943 52.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
191 53.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
7673 54.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2265 54.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7719 56.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7885 56.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
353 57.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7462 57.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7651 58.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
Tesla
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
2168 4.3 39% 70% 87% 93% 95%
1577 6.9 20% 55% 75% 84% 89%
27 10.4 8% 34% 54% 70% 79%
3357 14.1 5% 24% 42% 57% 64%
548 15.1 5% 20% 39% 52% 60%
346 16.2 2% 14% 31% 48% 56%
4917 18.0 2% 12% 28% 42% 53%
379 18.1 2% 12% 28% 43% 51%
525 18.4 2% 11% 27% 40% 49%
2534 20.0 2% 11% 23% 36% 45%
7457 20.3 <1% 8% 19% 32% 42%
5401 20.5 2% 12% 23% 36% 44%
610 21.9 <1% 7% 18% 29% 38%
3986 22.1 <1% 8% 20% 30% 39%
3620 22.4 <1% 8% 20% 30% 36%
3324 22.5 1% 8% 19% 31% 39%
1262 23.8 <1% 6% 17% 28% 36%
977 24.2 1% 7% 17% 26% 34%
1629 24.2 <1% 5% 14% 27% 33%
4967 24.6 <1% 5% 14% 23% 30%
4909 25.7 <1% 5% 12% 20% 28%
6569 26.1 <1% 4% 11% 19% 25%
1153 26.3 <1% 6% 15% 23% 29%
4338 26.6 <1% 4% 10% 19% 27%
1259 26.8 <1% 5% 13% 21% 29%
5205 27.1 <1% 4% 11% 20% 27%
4476 27.7 <1% 5% 12% 20% 25%
3197 28.2 <1% 3% 7% 16% 23%
834 28.5 <1% 4% 10% 17% 24%
1747 28.5 <1% 4% 12% 19% 26%
5618 28.9 <1% 2% 7% 14% 21%
1285 29.2 <1% 2% 8% 15% 20%
3572 30.3 <1% 2% 6% 13% 20%
4907 32.5 <1% 1% 6% 11% 15%
4329 32.7 <1% 1% 4% 9% 13%
2576 33.2 <1% 3% 7% 14% 18%
5992 33.6 <1% 2% 6% 11% 16%
3313 35.5 <1% 1% 4% 8% 12%
4122 35.6 <1% 2% 4% 8% 12%
6574 36.2 <1% <1% 3% 7% 11%
2451 36.4 <1% <1% 3% 6% 10%
341 40.1 <1% <1% 3% 5% 7%
229 40.8 <1% <1% 1% 4% 7%
5422 41.5 <1% <1% 2% 4% 6%
2177 44.2 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
4590 45.3 <1% <1% 1% 2% 3%
4939 46.2 <1% <1% 1% 3% 4%
5934 46.3 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
333 46.4 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
203 47.8 <1% <1% <1% 2% 2%
7626 48.3 <1% <1% <1% 2% 2%
1086 48.4 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
6964 48.5 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
1155 48.6 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
5667 48.8 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
2358 48.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
4145 49.0 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
6328 49.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
2095 50.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
7531 52.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7460 52.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
3026 53.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
6909 53.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7850 54.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2626 55.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
4817 58.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5585 60.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7554 60.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
9 Likes

Here are the projections using the prelim schedules. Again, huge thanks to @AriMB for putting these into a usable format for me. I ran these at 10K simulations, which means we can expect sample errors of <1%. Meaning any differences compared to the above projections greater than a couple of percent can be explained by the schedule.

Archimedes
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
5460 4.9 30% 65% 84% 91% 94%
930 6.7 16% 49% 73% 85% 91%
2481 7.4 11% 44% 69% 83% 89%
5687 8.3 8% 37% 64% 79% 86%
910 9.6 9% 34% 58% 73% 81%
2826 11.3 5% 26% 49% 66% 75%
1325 11.5 6% 26% 49% 65% 74%
2577 13.4 3% 18% 39% 57% 67%
5406 13.4 3% 20% 41% 58% 67%
4776 17.6 1% 9% 23% 40% 51%
33 18.3 1% 8% 23% 38% 48%
2054 19.6 1% 8% 21% 34% 44%
5676 20.3 1% 9% 21% 34% 44%
1640 21.4 <1% 3% 13% 26% 37%
4004 23.1 <1% 5% 14% 26% 35%
6591 23.1 <1% 4% 13% 25% 34%
188 24.9 <1% 3% 10% 20% 28%
2852 24.9 <1% 2% 9% 18% 27%
5927 25.1 <1% 2% 9% 18% 27%
222 25.4 <1% 2% 9% 18% 26%
509 26.0 <1% 3% 10% 18% 25%
141 26.7 <1% 2% 8% 16% 24%
2539 27.2 <1% 2% 7% 14% 22%
3534 27.5 <1% 2% 7% 14% 22%
3015 27.5 <1% 2% 7% 14% 21%
1310 27.7 <1% 1% 6% 14% 21%
4325 27.8 <1% 2% 7% 14% 21%
3688 28.1 <1% 2% 6% 13% 20%
2526 28.5 <1% 1% 5% 11% 18%
4678 28.7 <1% 2% 7% 13% 19%
4311 28.7 <1% 2% 7% 14% 21%
1720 29.4 <1% <1% 4% 10% 16%
614 30.1 <1% <1% 4% 10% 15%
4976 30.3 <1% 1% 5% 11% 16%
5216 31.0 <1% <1% 3% 9% 13%
3928 32.9 <1% <1% 3% 7% 10%
4391 35.5 <1% <1% 2% 4% 8%
1403 35.9 <1% <1% 2% 5% 8%
5404 36.3 <1% <1% 2% 5% 8%
2231 37.2 <1% <1% 1% 3% 6%
384 37.2 <1% <1% <1% 3% 5%
6802 37.4 <1% <1% 1% 4% 7%
5860 38.7 <1% <1% 1% 4% 6%
3184 41.7 <1% <1% <1% 3% 4%
3996 43.2 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
1322 43.3 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
3770 44.1 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
1025 45.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
4027 46.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
7617 46.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
4150 48.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
1937 48.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
7741 50.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
6317 50.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
4956 51.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5512 51.7 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
6032 51.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
271 52.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
1188 52.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
1660 54.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2077 55.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2708 56.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7650 57.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7605 59.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
564 59.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7858 59.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7589 63.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
4707 64.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
Carson
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
870 4.2 27% 69% 88% 95% 97%
3683 4.3 28% 69% 87% 95% 97%
1796 6.5 16% 50% 74% 86% 91%
5050 8.8 5% 32% 60% 78% 86%
85 9.6 6% 30% 57% 74% 82%
67 10.9 3% 24% 49% 67% 78%
619 11.0 2% 20% 46% 67% 78%
234 11.4 3% 21% 46% 65% 75%
4362 14.0 3% 15% 36% 54% 65%
3314 14.3 2% 13% 34% 52% 63%
1305 14.9 <1% 10% 29% 48% 60%
1076 17.5 <1% 7% 23% 40% 51%
3452 18.3 <1% 6% 19% 35% 46%
5172 19.3 <1% 5% 17% 32% 44%
747 22.5 <1% 4% 12% 24% 34%
2386 22.8 <1% 3% 11% 23% 32%
2960 23.4 <1% 2% 9% 19% 29%
2137 24.1 <1% 2% 9% 20% 29%
2590 24.7 <1% 1% 8% 18% 27%
2052 25.2 <1% 2% 8% 17% 25%
7160 26.0 <1% 2% 8% 17% 25%
876 26.6 <1% 2% 8% 15% 23%
1816 27.0 <1% 1% 6% 14% 22%
1768 27.3 <1% 1% 5% 13% 20%
5712 27.5 <1% 1% 6% 13% 20%
111 28.7 <1% <1% 4% 11% 17%
4607 29.6 <1% 1% 5% 11% 18%
3003 29.9 <1% <1% 3% 9% 14%
123 30.2 <1% <1% 3% 8% 14%
4342 30.3 <1% <1% 3% 8% 13%
5436 32.2 <1% <1% 4% 8% 13%
5883 32.4 <1% <1% 2% 6% 10%
3536 32.9 <1% <1% 2% 6% 11%
2096 33.2 <1% <1% 2% 7% 11%
7769 33.3 <1% <1% 2% 6% 10%
3750 33.9 <1% <1% 2% 6% 10%
2370 35.3 <1% <1% 1% 4% 6%
829 35.6 <1% <1% <1% 3% 6%
2549 35.9 <1% <1% 1% 4% 7%
1468 37.2 <1% <1% 1% 4% 6%
66 38.4 <1% <1% 1% 3% 6%
7656 38.5 <1% <1% <1% 2% 5%
1481 38.6 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
4472 41.0 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
7432 41.8 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
537 41.8 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
4256 43.6 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
5587 45.7 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
3467 45.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
2723 46.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
3386 47.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
293 48.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
3082 48.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
45 48.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
3504 49.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
3277 50.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
201 51.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2220 51.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2559 51.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
4930 51.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7785 58.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5243 59.7 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7048 61.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5690 61.7 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
3985 62.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7608 62.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
6911 62.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7400 65.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
Curie
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
2056 3.0 38% 80% 95% 99% >99%
195 4.6 23% 64% 85% 94% 97%
1114 5.9 12% 51% 78% 91% 95%
3538 7.8 6% 33% 65% 83% 90%
1684 8.2 5% 32% 63% 81% 89%
1807 8.7 2% 23% 59% 80% 89%
2851 8.9 5% 28% 58% 77% 86%
20 9.1 2% 23% 56% 78% 87%
987 12.0 3% 17% 41% 62% 73%
1519 14.2 <1% 9% 28% 50% 64%
78 14.2 <1% 9% 30% 50% 64%
2834 16.7 <1% 4% 18% 39% 54%
2607 17.4 <1% 4% 16% 35% 49%
2767 17.9 <1% 6% 19% 35% 48%
1241 20.9 <1% 2% 10% 24% 35%
303 21.9 <1% 2% 8% 20% 32%
302 22.5 <1% 2% 9% 21% 32%
237 22.7 <1% <1% 6% 17% 28%
230 24.0 <1% 2% 7% 16% 25%
401 24.2 <1% 1% 7% 17% 26%
4028 24.7 <1% 2% 7% 17% 26%
1360 25.8 <1% 1% 5% 13% 21%
177 26.4 <1% <1% 4% 12% 19%
3656 27.5 <1% <1% 3% 9% 15%
329 28.4 <1% <1% 4% 10% 16%
173 28.9 <1% <1% 3% 8% 14%
7553 28.9 <1% <1% 3% 8% 14%
494 30.3 <1% <1% 2% 7% 13%
107 30.6 <1% <1% 1% 6% 10%
3102 31.7 <1% <1% 2% 5% 10%
226 32.1 <1% <1% 1% 5% 9%
461 33.0 <1% <1% 1% 4% 7%
5530 33.5 <1% <1% 1% 4% 8%
967 35.2 <1% <1% <1% 3% 6%
3211 35.7 <1% <1% <1% 3% 5%
4213 36.1 <1% <1% <1% 2% 5%
314 37.2 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
1610 37.4 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
3339 37.9 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
6090 38.5 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
5509 39.4 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
3655 39.4 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
48 39.6 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
1756 39.6 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
11 41.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
56 42.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
126 42.5 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
7539 42.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5672 43.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
1501 43.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
1023 44.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
5847 45.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2998 47.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
193 47.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
1073 49.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
4285 49.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
4296 52.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
279 55.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7886 56.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5914 56.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5865 60.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2224 60.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7598 61.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5987 62.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7515 62.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
3654 62.7 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7590 65.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
Daly
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
319 4.8 25% 64% 84% 92% 95%
1718 6.1 19% 54% 77% 88% 92%
340 6.7 14% 48% 73% 86% 91%
2075 9.0 10% 36% 60% 75% 83%
133 9.4 7% 32% 57% 73% 82%
2200 9.5 6% 30% 57% 74% 82%
4680 10.6 4% 22% 48% 68% 78%
3641 10.7 4% 24% 50% 69% 78%
1885 17.2 2% 10% 26% 42% 53%
120 17.2 1% 10% 26% 42% 52%
172 17.2 1% 8% 24% 40% 52%
2638 17.8 <1% 8% 24% 41% 51%
4946 18.9 1% 9% 23% 37% 47%
4903 22.2 <1% 3% 12% 25% 35%
3990 22.6 <1% 3% 11% 23% 33%
4039 22.6 <1% 2% 10% 22% 32%
176 23.0 <1% 4% 13% 23% 32%
1506 23.3 <1% 3% 11% 22% 32%
1418 24.0 <1% 4% 11% 22% 30%
862 25.0 <1% 3% 9% 18% 27%
4541 25.3 <1% 3% 10% 20% 29%
4003 25.5 <1% 2% 8% 18% 26%
694 25.9 <1% 2% 8% 16% 24%
2702 26.4 <1% 2% 8% 16% 24%
2611 26.6 <1% 2% 7% 15% 22%
1729 27.7 <1% 2% 6% 13% 20%
4970 28.9 <1% 1% 5% 12% 18%
2062 28.9 <1% 1% 5% 13% 20%
1922 29.6 <1% 2% 6% 12% 18%
3075 29.9 <1% <1% 4% 10% 16%
2883 32.5 <1% <1% 3% 8% 12%
2619 32.9 <1% 1% 4% 9% 14%
4728 32.9 <1% <1% 3% 7% 11%
3414 32.9 <1% <1% 3% 8% 12%
1574 34.7 <1% <1% 2% 5% 9%
5926 35.7 <1% <1% 2% 5% 9%
223 36.0 <1% <1% 1% 4% 7%
3550 36.3 <1% <1% 2% 5% 8%
2994 38.7 <1% <1% <1% 3% 4%
4525 38.9 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
2614 41.3 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
1091 41.4 <1% <1% 1% 3% 5%
7491 43.0 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
4593 44.7 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
6237 44.9 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
1787 45.0 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
7645 45.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
7523 46.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
558 46.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
6016 46.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
4130 47.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
5125 47.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
2957 48.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
5740 48.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
6024 48.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
2673 49.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
6088 49.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2202 50.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5724 51.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
453 51.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
4096 52.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
3630 53.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2869 54.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7417 57.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
3193 59.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
6455 60.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7797 60.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7530 63.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
Darwin
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
1918 3.4 41% 77% 91% 96% 98%
2791 5.4 14% 55% 81% 93% 96%
868 6.5 13% 49% 74% 87% 92%
1676 7.6 8% 41% 68% 82% 88%
1690 10.2 5% 26% 52% 71% 80%
1923 10.3 5% 27% 53% 71% 79%
245 13.0 2% 16% 39% 58% 69%
5951 13.8 2% 14% 35% 54% 65%
3707 13.8 2% 14% 36% 54% 66%
1218 14.6 1% 12% 31% 49% 62%
103 14.8 <1% 9% 29% 49% 62%
225 15.4 2% 12% 30% 48% 59%
3146 15.5 1% 10% 28% 46% 59%
16 17.8 <1% 6% 21% 38% 50%
125 19.4 <1% 6% 19% 33% 44%
3542 19.6 <1% 5% 17% 31% 42%
2337 21.5 <1% 4% 12% 25% 37%
1058 24.0 <1% 3% 9% 19% 28%
503 25.0 <1% 1% 7% 16% 24%
5567 25.1 <1% 2% 8% 17% 26%
4253 26.3 <1% 1% 6% 14% 21%
3667 26.5 <1% <1% 5% 13% 21%
4143 26.9 <1% 1% 6% 13% 21%
3044 28.0 <1% <1% 4% 10% 18%
2502 29.0 <1% <1% 4% 10% 16%
217 29.3 <1% 1% 5% 11% 17%
88 30.2 <1% <1% 3% 9% 15%
3604 31.2 <1% <1% 3% 9% 14%
1781 31.9 <1% <1% 3% 7% 11%
4481 32.5 <1% <1% 2% 7% 11%
836 33.2 <1% <1% 2% 6% 10%
51 33.5 <1% <1% 1% 4% 8%
6401 34.1 <1% <1% 2% 5% 9%
190 34.2 <1% <1% 1% 4% 8%
1792 34.8 <1% <1% 2% 6% 9%
365 36.1 <1% <1% 1% 4% 7%
3381 36.6 <1% <1% <1% 3% 6%
4381 37.6 <1% <1% <1% 3% 5%
3555 37.9 <1% <1% 1% 3% 5%
5084 37.9 <1% <1% <1% 3% 5%
772 39.5 <1% <1% <1% 3% 5%
1024 39.7 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
5501 40.1 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
2771 41.0 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
2830 41.0 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
5348 41.1 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
449 42.2 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
3926 44.4 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
2500 44.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
3624 45.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
5811 46.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
250 46.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
6806 49.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7480 50.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7885 50.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
771 52.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
236 53.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
3618 54.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7462 54.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5943 54.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2265 55.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7673 55.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
1317 56.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
175 59.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7651 59.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
191 60.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7719 60.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
353 64.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
Tesla
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
1577 2.4 50% 89% 97% 99% >99%
2168 3.4 34% 80% 92% 96% 98%
1262 11.2 2% 25% 51% 66% 75%
7457 12.4 2% 21% 44% 61% 70%
3357 12.9 2% 19% 41% 58% 68%
27 13.3 1% 17% 38% 56% 65%
1629 13.6 <1% 13% 35% 53% 65%
3620 15.2 <1% 14% 32% 48% 59%
3324 15.7 <1% 14% 32% 47% 58%
346 17.1 <1% 8% 23% 39% 50%
1285 17.3 <1% 9% 25% 40% 51%
525 17.5 <1% 7% 22% 38% 49%
4329 17.8 <1% 8% 23% 37% 48%
379 18.0 <1% 9% 23% 37% 47%
1153 18.1 <1% 7% 22% 37% 48%
3986 18.8 <1% 8% 21% 35% 45%
4476 19.0 <1% 7% 21% 35% 45%
1259 20.0 <1% 6% 18% 31% 41%
1747 20.4 <1% 6% 19% 32% 41%
4917 21.6 <1% 5% 15% 27% 36%
4338 21.8 <1% 4% 13% 25% 34%
341 23.7 <1% 3% 11% 20% 28%
3572 23.8 <1% 2% 9% 20% 28%
834 24.2 <1% 2% 9% 19% 27%
5401 24.7 <1% 3% 10% 19% 27%
610 25.4 <1% 3% 8% 17% 24%
548 26.3 <1% 2% 8% 16% 22%
3197 26.3 <1% 2% 7% 14% 21%
2534 27.9 <1% 1% 6% 12% 18%
2576 29.0 <1% 2% 5% 12% 17%
2358 31.4 <1% <1% 3% 8% 12%
6328 32.7 <1% <1% 3% 7% 11%
4122 33.1 <1% <1% 2% 5% 8%
6574 33.5 <1% <1% 2% 5% 9%
5205 33.8 <1% <1% 2% 5% 8%
4967 35.9 <1% <1% 2% 4% 6%
5618 36.0 <1% <1% <1% 3% 5%
4909 36.4 <1% <1% 1% 3% 5%
977 38.4 <1% <1% <1% 3% 5%
2177 40.3 <1% <1% <1% 2% 4%
4907 41.0 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
5992 41.4 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
2451 42.4 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
6569 42.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
3313 42.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
6909 43.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
4590 44.3 <1% <1% <1% 1% 2%
333 44.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
3026 44.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
4939 46.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
5667 46.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5934 47.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
7626 48.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
1155 50.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
229 51.7 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7460 52.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
4145 53.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5422 54.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
1086 54.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
203 55.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7850 56.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2626 59.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5585 60.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7554 61.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2095 61.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
4817 61.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7531 63.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
6964 63.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%

Good luck to everyone! Feel free to call out what you think is silly. Go out and beat them if you don’t like where I’ve got you.

24 Likes

Caleb, you are the man. Thanks a bunch! Thanks also to @AriMB

2 Likes

Really hoping that rank for us will change… unfortunately, we got our cargo and hatch mechanisms on AFTER our competitions… though they do seem to be promising, based on the testing we’ve done

1 Like

Curious to see how accurate the Houston predictions were.

1 Like

I’m really interested to how much variability there is in general and also the difference the variability between the schedule simulations and the non-schedule simulations. The difference shows how much scheduling can change things.

Have you ever considered doing significance testing or something to compare the actually variability in placing with the model’s variability?

1 Like

what does the average rank show? Is that like a projected rank? 111 ranked 8th at both their regional events and it shows their average rank at 28ish. thanks in advance.

Don’t know for sure, but I think the event simulator runs multiple simulations and shows the average value for a certain teams rank.

I think average rank is the average of all simulations. For example, if 100 simulations are run, and team 9999 seeds 1st in 40, 2nd in 30, 3rd in 20, and 4th in 10, they will have an average rank of (1*40+2*30+3*20+4*10)/100 = 2.00

1 Like

To get a predicted seed, you have to count the number of teams with a lower average rank.

Correct. It’s a Monte Carlo style simulation which runs 10,000 times and displays average rank.

1 Like

2% eh…fc2fca5cc8833d35c92822a6af386914480a4e7c2411a6329d9742eb6bc89110

12 Likes

I like those odds

Yeah, your team in gonna need a pick list …

1 Like

That’s how I am feeling!

Caleb are you factoring climbs into your predictions?
Our prematch predictions were a little skewed, and we figured out it was because the opposing alliance often had 3 robots that could climb to level 3. Usually this doesn’t pan out in a match, because only one can fit.

I don’t have a factor like that in my predictions. Someday perhaps I’ll get that advanced, but right now my win predictions assume no interaction between teammate abilities.

Curious to see how accurate the Houston predictions were.

I’m really interested to how much variability there is in general and also the difference the variability between the schedule simulations and the non-schedule simulations. The difference shows how much scheduling can change things.

Here ya go: Houston Ranking Projections

1 Like

Can you run predictions for the new Curie schedule?

2 Likes

Sure:

Curie with new schedule
Team average rank 1 Top 4 Top 8 Top 12 Top 15
2056 3.1 36% 81% 95% 98% >99%
195 4.2 24% 67% 89% 95% 98%
2767 4.8 17% 60% 86% 95% 97%
1114 5.4 10% 52% 83% 94% 97%
1519 8.7 3% 26% 60% 80% 87%
3538 9.4 3% 25% 56% 75% 84%
2851 9.6 2% 19% 52% 75% 85%
78 13.1 <1% 8% 30% 55% 69%
1807 13.9 <1% 9% 30% 51% 65%
2607 15.0 <1% 8% 26% 47% 60%
987 15.9 1% 8% 24% 42% 55%
5530 16.5 <1% 5% 21% 40% 53%
303 16.8 <1% 5% 19% 38% 51%
2834 18.1 <1% 3% 14% 32% 45%
3656 18.6 <1% 4% 16% 31% 44%
20 18.8 <1% 4% 16% 32% 45%
48 22.0 <1% 2% 8% 18% 30%
1241 22.3 <1% 2% 9% 21% 31%
461 22.4 <1% 2% 8% 19% 29%
107 23.0 <1% <1% 6% 16% 26%
3211 23.2 <1% 1% 8% 18% 28%
230 23.4 <1% 2% 9% 19% 29%
1684 25.5 <1% 1% 6% 14% 22%
226 26.0 <1% <1% 4% 11% 19%
1023 26.3 <1% <1% 5% 11% 19%
4028 26.8 <1% 1% 5% 13% 20%
329 27.9 <1% <1% 3% 9% 16%
7553 28.8 <1% <1% 2% 5% 10%
302 28.9 <1% <1% 3% 8% 14%
401 31.9 <1% <1% 1% 4% 9%
56 32.4 <1% <1% 2% 5% 9%
3339 32.9 <1% <1% 1% 4% 8%
3655 35.0 <1% <1% <1% 2% 5%
314 35.2 <1% <1% <1% 3% 6%
237 36.2 <1% <1% <1% 3% 6%
4213 36.7 <1% <1% <1% 3% 5%
3102 37.4 <1% <1% <1% 2% 3%
11 39.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
5509 39.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
967 39.9 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
4285 41.1 <1% <1% <1% 1% 3%
177 42.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
1073 43.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
193 43.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% 2%
494 43.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
279 45.7 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
6090 46.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% 1%
1756 46.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
173 48.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2998 48.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
1360 48.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
1610 50.7 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7886 50.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7539 51.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5987 51.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5847 52.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5672 52.4 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
1501 52.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
2224 53.0 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
126 53.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7039 53.3 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
4296 55.2 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
3654 56.6 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5914 57.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5865 57.9 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7515 61.1 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7590 61.8 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
7598 62.5 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1%
5 Likes