2025 Robot CAD in 24 Hours + Kickoff Watchalong

Well, I’m done with this CAD run-through. I won’t have computer access for a week, so I’ll call it done. Intake is unfinished, but it’s close enough.

It would be more polished if I had more time, but I’m calling it good. This game is hard.

I think I would redo the intake and try to shave half the weight off so I can put it into the ballast, but I think I would wait for OA team prototyping.

I think I also have a lot of play w/ the elevator angle to get one that is optimized, though, to be honest, I’m just out of time.

Thanks to @Connor-8177 and @Aarsenic for the help

Introducing davidbot pt2 (???)

Features:

  1. Optimized L2-L3 Corral Scoring
  2. Launched L1 Scoring (needs to be improved this is meh)
  3. Algae Removal
  4. Continuous Ground Pickup from all orientations
  5. Source pickup (???)
  6. Some of the most cursed pocketing known to man

Skipped:

  1. Climbing
  2. Processor Scoring
  3. Algae Shooting
  4. L4

Weight Specs

  1. end effector weight: 4.371 lbs
  2. elevator weight: 18.249 lbs
  3. indexer weight: 10.233 lbs
  4. dt weight: 54 lbs
  5. intake weight: 23 lbs (rushed and incomplete)
  6. someone good at design plz help me budget my weight my robot is dying

On intake:

Intake was pretty much rushed and done late since I ended up pivoting intake designs really late. Most of the weight comes from the flex wheels/shafts right now, but I think I could probably do a redesign that’s half the weight.

That being said, the reason for the size was to see if I could get vertical pipes by just intaking at a really safe angle. It’s pretty much just roughed out right now.

CG Specs

7 Inches high when stowed
10 Inches when Extended
11.73 Inches when Counter Balanced (?)

Strategy

Auto: Remove 1 Algae and place corral l3 auto w/ hp dropping pieces on ground

Start of match: Remove 2 Algae in visible locations, hp starts flooding field w/ corral
After: Cycle corral - repeat till match ends

Stow Config


Intake Config

Extended Config



Algae Removal


Source Pickup ???

L3 Scoring

L2 Scoring

L1 Scoring (launching?)

29 Likes

Last minute intake redesign was a fever dream but this was really fun to work on and this is a really cool robot concept

6 Likes

Hey, very nice design!

Just a small issue.

The Onshape link seems view-only, we can’t create forks of your design to make changes.

That’s on purpose

9 Likes

Davis is forcing pph whether you like it or not

1 Like

@howlongismyname How would you improve this intake if you had more time? I’m thinking of designing an intake similar to this where reorienting the coral into a scoring position is done within the intake like in this.

Current improvements I’m thinking of are using a NEO 550 instead of the kraken to spin the rollers and using fewer long standoffs to support the plates.

1 Like

Going to 550 from a Kraken is not an improvement.

3 Likes

Main issue here was the weight, so I figured a 550 would work just fine to drive the wheels on the intake. Unless I’m missing some controllability/reliability issue, it looks like I’d save a little over half a pound with an ultraplanetary.

The Kraken x60 and x44 are 1.2lbs and 0.75lbs respectively as per WCP. Running an entire unprotected intake off of 1 NEO 550 is not a good idea, no matter the gearing.

By the time you reach a reduction enough to spin all the wheels and over power any binding that may come with an OTB intake, you lose any meaningful free speed.

Search around CD and you’ll see how often people smoke the wires on the 550.

Stock and use all the same motors, standardize. There’s a reason top teams like Spectrum use only 1 type of CIM-class motor.

REV team? Buy another Fullsize or Vortex and run it off of the same SPARK MAX or other applicable motor controller. WCP team? Kraken x60.

2 Likes

Probably replacing the whole thing and doing something w/ less intake range, (not all orientations, smaller than full width), less efficient intaking but significantly lighter

i would stay with 1 kraken and i wouldn’t complain about doing 2 krakens powering the rollers.

The weight issue isn’t coming from the kraken, its mostly from the rollers

1 Like

In hindsight this intake is not great and I’m going to redesign it so it only intakes horizontal corral with a more limited range.

Should remove 3/4th the weight with very little competitive loss

2 Likes

Is there a reason you can’t just put something like a bag on it?

Why would I compromise one of the most important parts of my robot? The motors aren’t what’s causing the weight.

I didn’t really mean in terms of weight, I was just wondering if that much power necessary.
Your cad is amazing

Ya it’s generally safer to add extra power then to under power and regret it from a design perspective. 3 cim class motors on shooter, 2 motors on intake, ect much harder to regret it

1 Like

Is there a way to download the CAD file, I 3d print mini robots for fun and was wondering if this is something you’d grant the ability to do? If you are looking to prevent other teams from using your design I just need an STL file, which I wouldn’t be able to edit

Can you tell me what the problem with intake is right now? (Sorry if I asked something silly, I’m new to designing.)

Right now the intake is 23lbs, which is quite a bit of weight. @howlongismyname also said that his intake design was rushed, so I wanted to see what he had in mind for improvements if he had more time to play with.

2 Likes