Basic pneumatics questions

Hello there,

I’m from team 1257. After having played defense (and not much else) in the past district event, we are looking to attempt to implement a solution for launching the ball over the truss for the next competition, in roughly a week and a half. While I fully believe in my team’s ability to do so, I do have a couple questions about pneumatics.

  1. At competition, I was talking to teams and they said they had both a high pressure and a low pressure circuit going, at 120 and 60 psi respectively. How is this possible, if there is a pressure regulator at 60 psi that’s required before all pistons? Furthermore, how can the tanks get up to 120 psi if there is a 60 psi regulator in the circuit? The way it appears in the FIRST setup (http://frc-manual.usfirst.org/upload/images/2014/1/Figure4-15.jpg) it doesn’t look like there’s a break between the tanks and the regulator …

  2. Is there a limit to the number of tanks that we are allowed to have? Also, are we allowed to place tanks after the regulator? I haven’t found anything specifically mentioning either in the rules.

3)For a team new to pneumatics, and given the time constraints, I think a latch system to store energy, or any tampering with the pistons (removing fittings to make flow faster, etc), is out of the question. Furthermore, since a 2-3 stage setup would be needed to make a successful ram, would our only option become a trebuchet?

  1. I found tanks from our old seasons which are only open on one end (threaded opening). All other tanks (metal or plastic) have threaded/push to connect openings on both sides. Are the one sided containers tanks, and, if they are, would they just be connected to other tanks at the one end, using a t-connector?

We have about 30 pounds free to work with on the robot right now. Would this be enough for a full pneumatic system? If I’m not mistaken, we would be looking at something like 2x 10" stroke 1" bore cylinders (I think that’s how one specifies cylinders?), along with the older, more heavy-duty compressor, a few tanks, likely metal (we have new black plastic Clippard tanks but are hesitant to use them due to stories of the white ones fracturing), and a little bit of tubing, brass connectors, and a few electronics. I can’t imagine this getting up beyond 30 pounds; that being said, is there anything blatantly obvious I’m forgetting?

That being said, I would appreciate if someone could either answer these questions (and anything else that you think a beginner to pneumatics should know). I would also appreciate any general tips/pointers, or really anything else.

Thank you for your time and for reading,
Hades

Edit: Slightly unrelated. Is there any use for rotational cylinders? I found one sitting in our stock of pneumatic components and I was wondering if it would be remotely useful for FIRST related things. If we’re allowed to use it, I see it as possibly being useful for blocking the pistons to build up pressure, among other things. Do teams use them at all?

  1. There is a direction associated with the regulator, If you look closely at one there’s a arrow. Everything below that will be the regulated pressure. Everything before the first regulator is referred to as the high side.

2)No Limit except for space and cost considerations. Yes you can put tanks after the regulator but usually not done.

  1. You can use a latch system to store the energy. I think what will work for you will depend on more information.

  2. you can use various fittings from brass Ts to plastic quick disconnect T’s. You may screw in quick disconnect fittings into them.

30 Pounds should be sufficient for a pneumatic system. The old compressor weights in around 10 lbs.

You can use the rotational cylinder.

The high pressure is storage, regulated down to 60 psi for working pressure. Often it’s easier to refer to the two sided separately. Tanks can be on the high-pressure side; cylinders cannot.

  1. Is there a limit to the number of tanks that we are allowed to have? Also, are we allowed to place tanks after the regulator? I haven’t found anything specifically mentioning either in the rules.
    No, and yes. I believe both were asked in Q&A. I will comment that the more tanks you have, the more time your one compressor will take to fill them. If you can’t refill after a match in 5 minutes or less, you’ll be at a disadvantage in eliminations.

3)For a team new to pneumatics, and given the time constraints, I think a latch system to store energy, or any tampering with the pistons (removing fittings to make flow faster, etc), is out of the question. Furthermore, since a 2-3 stage setup would be needed to make a successful ram, would our only option become a trebuchet?
I think you may want to consider the application of leverage. If you have the piston fairly low on a linkage, near the pivot, and the piston fires quickly, imagine how fast the OTHER end of that link is going…

  1. I found tanks from our old seasons which are only open on one end (threaded opening). All other tanks (metal or plastic) have threaded/push to connect openings on both sides. Are the one sided containers tanks, and, if they are, would they just be connected to other tanks at the one end, using a t-connector?
    Based on the description, yes (given no moving parts), and yes (though connector is up to you).

We have about 30 pounds free to work with on the robot right now. Would this be enough for a full pneumatic system? If I’m not mistaken, we would be looking at something like 2x 10" stroke 1" bore cylinders (I think that’s how one specifies cylinders?), along with the older, more heavy-duty compressor, a few tanks, likely metal (we have new black plastic Clippard tanks but are hesitant to use them due to stories of the white ones fracturing), and a little bit of tubing, brass connectors, and a few electronics. I can’t imagine this getting up beyond 30 pounds; that being said, is there anything blatantly obvious I’m forgetting?
I don’t think you’re forgetting much, as long as the “electronics” includes solenoid valves. You’ll also want the Solenoid Module for the cRIO, or a Spike per solenoid valve. You’ve spec’d the cylinders correctly, near as I can tell. But 30 lbs with the older compressor and metal tanks could get a little bit tight, particularly with the material of the launcher itself to factor in. Also verify that you have all the stuff that is required: relief valve for the compressor, manual vent valve, gauges, the regulator, and the pressure sensor.

A couple of other tips: Set up a test system first, to validate that your knowledge of pneumatics works. Leak check with soapy water, sprayed onto the tubing near the valves at the suspected leak point. Go with an onboard compressor–I suspect you’ll have lots of leaks; you want to be able to counter them. Cut your tubing at 90 degree angles; that’ll help with reducing leaks at fittings.

But you may hook up multiple solenoids to 1 spike relay. You can also hook up 2 individual single action solenoids to 1 relay and still maintain control over both individually.

You should be able to fit a pneumatic system in 30lbs withholding allowance fairly easily, especially considering almost all of it will be COTS parts. You’ll have to do a of plumbing and testing the system on Thursday (especially considering it doesn’t sound like you’ve done one before), but this is a time issue instead of weight. Read through all the official materials on pneumatics from FIRST so you can make sure to build a legal system, make a solid plan (if you can, CAD out the location of tanks/solenoids/compressor), and then ask around for someone really experienced with pneumatics as soon as you get to competition. You’ll need their help putting things together the first time around, especially finding and fixing leaks.

I would use the black Clippard tanks any day over the metal ones, especially considering weight is a concern. The problems (which frankly, in my opinion have been dwelt on a bit too long) were with the white tanks, and unless you physically damage the black tanks, you won’t have them explode on you. The metal tanks weigh a ton, and only store a tiny bit of air compared to the plastic ones.

The teams talking about two pressure levels were likely only referring to the stored (in the tanks/off the compressor) pressure and working pressure (in the cylenders/solenoids/off the regulator). If they weren’t, they had an illegal system. There’s no restriction on whether you have tanks above or bellow the 120 psi level. You can keep them on the 60 psi side if you want.

There’s no limit on number of tanks, except the rules for the robot size and weight (you can’t have an infinite number of tanks, as they will be too big/heavy).

Figuring out how to build a pneumatic catapult (which sounds like the way to go, from what I’ve heard on CD) is something that needs either prototyping or for you to copy someone else’s design. It takes a fair amount of iteration to get a system that will throw the ball exactly how you want it, and I certainly wouldn’t build your final mechanism without doing a bit of prototyping and research first. I hope someone who actually built a pneumatic catapult will chime in on this thread.

Thank you both. How would you recommend that we cut the tubing? I’ve tried to use scissors and xacto knives/box cutters but none of them seem to be doing the job well, or at all in some cases. Should I be using something like wire cutters?

I should mention that there is already a hinged ramp on our robot which we are simply planning on actuating with 2 cylinders at this point. As was mentioned, we should hopefully be able to attach near the bottom of the ramp (close to the hinge) to help it swing forward rapidly.

A Pneumatic Tubing Cutter likethis.

Edit: McmasterCarr Carries them too

Diagonal cutters should work–but as I noted earlier, you want that tubing cut as close to straight across as you can get. I’ve seen special cutters for the stuff that help with that, but I’m not sure where to get 'em, especially on short notice.

I like to use wire cutters. Just make sure to squeeze hard, so the tubing it cut nice and clean. If the cuts aren’t perfectly straight, your system will leak.

Incidentally, the withholding limit is just under how much weight we can add onto the currently functional robot and still be under the magical 120 lbs. It wasn’t the 30 lbs (is it still 45 now, for MAR?) withholding limit I was talking about, but the weight we could add on the robot. Truth be told, I forgot there was a withholding limit :D.

Well, the only concern that I have with the black plastic tanks is that they’re rated for about 35 to 100 degrees F, same as the white ones I believe. In New Jersey at this time of the year there is still a risk of the temperatures dropping that low (though it’s getting to the point where that isn’t nearly that much of a concern). My point is that if the robot is stored outside overnight (ie. unheated garage, which has happened on the weekends), then we might induce thermal fracture on the tanks. I’ve heard fabric around the tanks will help mitigate some of the damage from explision, but safety is still a concern.

Gotcha, thanks. That makes sense.

There was also talk of using some interesting pneumatics physics where, between 3 pistons, they were able to achieve (if I remember correctly) 250% of the normal psi? Is this even possible, or am I simply remembering wrong?

We will certainly be doing some prototyping before adding onto the robot. The plan is to get prototypes and basic testing done before the weekend, then spend the weekend constructing a system to actually put onto the robot.

Gotcha, thanks. As the poster above pointed out, apparently McMaster carries a tool for this. They have a warehouse near us, perhaps we can go tomorrow and pick one up directly. Thanks again.

I’ve also heard that L-connectors should be avoided whenever possible; is this true, and are there any other connectors that I should be avoiding?

I wonder if the cutters at the center of most needlenose pliers will work?

Could be.

It’s illegal (and unwise) to configure pistons such that they will boost the PSI in another one (although it’s possible). If they were doing it like this, they weren’t following the rules, and have a potentially pretty unsafe situation on their hands.

What they were probably talking about is configuring the pistons such that they generate three times the force, maybe just by moving where they attach to the catapult, or by just using three side by side instead of one. It’s just basic physics/mechanical advantage stuff.

They also could be talking about getting a 250% faster flow rate by doing a pneumatic tank on the vent, using special solenoids, or some other tricky pneumatics stuff.

That “tricky pneumatics stuff” sounds rather interesting, actually, but we should probably stay away from it for the time being. By special solenoids, do you mean ones with a higher flow rate? I was reading here that there’s either less regulation or none at all on the solenoids used this year; could someone confirm/deny this, and then possibly suggest the solenoids their team uses (if they’re not the standard ones)?

Cylinders come with no fittings so leaving it out of the retract side to make the cylinder extend quicker isn’t anything advanced. To retract the mechanism you may be able to use gravity alone, if that is not enough a light spring like a bit of surgical tubing can help it get started.

For solenoids the only restriction this year is that the maximum port size is 1/8" NPT. A single acting solenoid is all you need for a gravity/spring retract style set up.

It can be very effective both a pneumatic catapult and focusing on getting those 10 truss points. At the Mt Vernon district event team 4918 used a pneumatic powered catapult and and focused on getting the truss points on every cycle along with a triple assist to become the #1 seed.

Check out this thread for a render of their robot. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=126798&highlight=4918+render the only thing that isn’t in there is a bit of surgical tubing to make sure that it gets back from the vertical position so that gravity can return it to the loading position.

Bit of a deviation here. But is a pneumatic catapult really the best option here? Especially considering that you don’t already have the system on the robot, it’s just one more thing to add along with the catapult. You said you have 30 pounds left, and unless you’ve used all your cims, mini-cims, and banebots motors you still have plenty of power left. Electrically driven catapults are super simple, requiring you to just hook a gearbox to a shaft via some sort of pulley or chain. No locking mechanism, springs, or pneumatic required. They require complex coding to make accurate shots, but just trussing could be accomplished by something as simple as boom done’s system from RI3D. Using a torque limiting belt removes the need for precise control. IMHO it would be the easiest way to add a trussing capability to your robot. But that’s just my two cents.

THH1, (Get ready for a book…just a taste of what it would/should entail).

The rate I type at, it takes less time to actually build the system than to type it all in.

Do you have any pics, CAD Drawings and/or video up close currently of your bagged bot (not the bot in the bag, leave that alone), that can be worked from? Time to skype this weekend or much sooner w/ you and an Adult Team Mentor present, possibly a few others? Have any of the necessary materials…Compressor w/ the attached check valve, Compressor relief valve, shutoff switch, the necessary Crio module & board, to fire the selenoids, pwm cables to attach the selenoids to it, (a roll or 2 of that wonderful stuff commonly & normally referred to in the hardware & plumbing industries as "Teflon Thread Sealing Tape, but isn’t really…TTFE?)…Need to look at the pneumatics set up paper or diagram, print it out, and gather as many of the basic required items necessary. (Time to order and get delivery before the weekend is very short…I have the time to help long distance though if you and the team want to try the cool bold plan you asked for help on). You are not afraid of work I gather.

We can start w/ the link… http://frc-manual.usfirst.org/upload/images/2014/1/Figure4-15.jpg (Print it out now please!)

Just to start the project. Even before you think about the ball firing mechanism (and how those cylinders to be used will even attach, is it strong enough and mounted strong enough to handle the forces you will apply to it as built? (Do you have a cad drawing of the bot before it was bagged, or lots of detailed pics or vids that we can discuss together as a group)…Do you have the materials necessary to begin the project, or can you obtain them by the weekend? Will the end result added wt. fit within the 30 lbs. necessary and available? If not, can wt. be reduced elsewhere on the bot at the same time on Thursday at the event while, and at the same time as you still mount and test this added system on Thursday at the event, and still put that robot on a diet too to make wt. after it is completed, at the event? We can see easy enough. 8 days…Plenty of time left.

If done right, and safely, you can pre-build the system components, mount it to a board and test the completed system leaving the air tubes quite longer than necessary, test the design simply and make sure the system holds pressure properly, then dismount it, and box it up in components ready to add to that bot as soon as the bag is removed in 8 days. Trim only one end the tubes there down squarely & carefully to fit, add the required pcs. to make that mechanism work, and test it. (that tubing cut will never go to waste in the future…pcs of the tubing as short as 2" are useful and quite necessary often. Read below about the work and expenses involved first.

Not in any way attempting to discourage you in any way…Please understand that, OK? (Prepare, prepare, prepare).


Lets add up the added weight first to create the required system (grab a cardboard box or plastic bin about 3’ X 2’ X 2’ or so, I do hope you have a scale avail…Now get the Tare / empty weight of the empty box and mark the box). Don’t start to actually assemble anything anything yet, just read it all first. We’ll possibly work from it later.

Start to gather up the parts you do have and will need & weigh them all together. Cylinders you will use (start w/3 and if possible we’ll reduce to 2 if necessary and it fits the parameters, and the mounting hardware currently believed will be necessary to attach it to your existing mechanism? Put those in the box, set the tare wt. and put the box on that scale.

Next you will need to provide a spike relay (set that aside next in that box), to power the compressor…Proper Main Board to the spike wiring, and another breaker for that MB, put a 20 Amp Breaker properly into the spike and set the fuse aside, add mounting hardware for the compressor and the spike to the mix (keep filling that box please). Start to figure out where on the bot you will mount that compressor, spike, gauge, regulator and gauge, and possibly up to 4 tanks w/ mounting clips to mount later where they will be very protected. (Pics or good video and a CAD design drawing, are a must here!)

As plastic tanks and 20" ball pickups, and really hard fast hits do not mix very well w/ this high powered fast smacking game. If you cannot hide and protect them, then I would suggest at least metal tanks instead.

We’ll talk about that later once we see the bot.

Then the compressor is going to be wired directly from the spike, will be mounting the compressor w/ that chrome check valve, a brass close nipple, a brass (female X female X female) “T”, and a push in type tubing female X threaded male fitting to the other side of the brass “T” (all threads properly tape wrapped and tightened), and the brass Compressor Relief Valve properly set not to exceed 125 PSI attached directly to that brass “T” (we’ll get to that later during testing). You are going to be very careful in mounting that compressor Relief Valve to that compressor, and backing up w/ multiple wrenches, every connection tightening sequence when installing that on the compressor so as not to damage the head on the compressor (if it is the model in the link), so you get each joint properly tightened, so as to minimize any later air leakages, but do not damage that compressor). I do know secrets to doing that easily, that I can teach you along w/ proper thread sealing processes. (If your team is not that familiar w/ them). Once you get the knack, it all becomes fairly easy.

Once the compressor is together w/ the valve(s) attached and ready (put that in the box too. Add in another Brass (F X F X F) treaded “T”, and the required shutoff switch and the related wiring, and a high pressure gauge, and low pressure regulator and gauge set…(one is a guage only- will be used for high pressure reads 0- 200 PSI), (the other is the setable regulator w/ guage 0-100 PSI)…In the diagram, the lower right one is high pressure, the upper left is the combination regulator and low pressure gauge set…and that 1 clippard black tank (would contain and store air at 110-120 PSI…120 Max.), is situated on the high pressure side in the diagram.

They do not show on the diagram any low pressure tanks (which if used, would store air at 60 PSI Max), in that particular diagram. (for good measure start w/ 3-4 of the black 2014 tanks if you have them…and add the mounts and mounting hardware…later what you actually will need (to fire that ball), can be fine tuned to reduce the number and wt. if possible. (Put all those in the box too along w/ all the other fittings needed to attach each to the legal pnuematic poly tubing…Throw in at least 1 or 2 rolls of said, your color choice tubing…Make sure it is marked properly along the length of the tubing as legal (or keep that packaging it came in), and add a pressure vent valve and it’s related mounting hardware and necessary threaded / push type release attachment to tubing fitting).

Is that box getting full yet? How much does it weigh right now?

Next we are going to figure out what selenoids you will be using to fire off those cylinders with on (that I will later suggest), as it is required by the rules, that they be installed on the low pressure MAX 60 PSI side…and a base block to use to mount them and supply them from that low pressure regulator on (12 volt type are suggested here)…I’ll help you w/ that choice later, but it is getting late to order those if you don’t have them already for a build this weekend, so ordering would be necessary tomorrow or soon, of all that you may not have along w/ probably overnight expensive delivery possibly added)…and you will need 1 for each cylinder at least, you only need to fire the cylinders one way to shoot the ball up, just vent the other end completely of the cylinders (no fitting installed, your mechanism will return by gravity normally), by attaching no fittings to the opposite ends…3 cylinders should do it…never know until I can see the bot pics.

Next gather a whole host of plastic or metal “T”'s & 90’s, and the like (say 20 of each to just start, and some tubing connector smooth type plugs, get 10 at least…i’ll help again w/ that list), and add them in the box gently. Now what does that box weigh?

That link we have been building a materials list and weight off of, is about 1/2of the actual system necessary, and a bit more than 1/2 of the total wt. necessary to do the whole pneumatic system. That is only the high pressure side up to and through the regulator step down to the low pressure side. But, we have been adding in the actual parts necessary already for that high pressure side also into the box or onto the purchase list.

Actually Designing the working system is next.

Let’s just say we are going to design for 3 cylinders (if 2 cylinders will work for the application, I would reduce the tanks and cylinders by 1, shedding wt.)…I would suggest 1 high pressure tank, then after the regulator, we will 'T" off to the block, and run to each of 3 low pressure storage tanks, then out of each, to the selenoids, then from each selenoid to 1 same end of each of the cylinders (pull up, or push up choice, and mounting direction of the cylinders must be carefully chosen here, along w/ the actual cylinder desired angle of attack (that was what you were asking about earlier, that force multiplier…find your best math student and put him/her to work there), and available pivot locations, and consider the strength of the materials available on that existing ramp and its pivot point and mountings, to change it to an actual 25" ball firing mechanism to determine the actual design force of that to be built new catapult)…each cylinder would have it’s own tank volume in actuality to fire from, but must also be programmed to fire together in tandem. My son could help you w/ the programming later if needed.

Please do not take offense here (changing a Toyota into a BMW, or a Chevy into a Cadillac if you’d rather, in 1 weekend or so can be done…It takes time, materials, and/or money to get them faster, and patience…And a lot of hard work and willingness to learn)…STILL INTERESTED?) Is the team including avail. Adult Mentors actually interested?

If so, get back to me w/ an adult mentor by your side here. We’ll PM first, then, set up the skype setup, look at what you have first (pics at least please), and see if it is possible, see what materials you do have, and possibly get to work. At least that way you would have the components necessary to bolt in ready w/ actual help pre-arranged if smart, you can find from other teams at your event, to then help you install everything, and shake out the bugs and test it.

Getting expert help at the event can probably be arranged right here through CD in advance, I would suspect by listing in the Regionals Section and asking for pre-arranged help. But having a complete design, a plan, and drop in tested components ready, not to mention a little further pneumatics education for the team, would help tremendously in 8 days. And in the years ahead too.

I applaud your teams want to improve your bot after the build/bag season is completed, and between events. That is what that holdback allowance is really for.

Fancy tubing cutters are nice…a good pr. of diagonal cutters, a 6" section of tubing and a little practice cutting that up into 1/4" sections and a few tips on the angle to hold the cutters perfectly perpendicular to the tube, and in a half hr. you will be an expert. (I personally use and suggest the measure the tube once a bit longer, cut twice method).

Measure it an inch too long, cut fast, then trim it down carefully a bit long…Miss, you can still cut a 1/4" off again if it is a leaker later. Do not make the tubing too short this first time, easiest way to make that run a leaker is to do that.

There are other ideas out there that may work better for your purpose, our bot has a pneumatic catapult of a rather simple but well repeating design, gravity return, no sping action necessary or used there, 3 properly sized cylinders, the right cylinder angle chosen for the pivot point, 1 high pressure tank currently installed, w/ the easy addition if wanted to add 2 more tanks & clips in just minutes, 3 low pressure tanks (all protected inside the bot and not easy to reach into to damage or harm easily), and shoots truss and high goal perfectly static or “on the run”, at just 50 PSI set w/ the option to go to 60 PSI, by just dialing up the regulator a bit. We use the newer and smaller/lighter compressor though, for wt. & space savings and faster filling & ease of mounting/replacement if necessary. And 4 12 volt selenoids (3 use single action for those catapult cylinders, in use and 1 uses double action for the 2 open / close type Ball P.U. Cylinders). We are defr not the Ri3D or El Toro type ball P.U…

Oh…And the right programming to make all 3 of those cylinders fire together at the same time. (That is a key to reliable repeatability I’m told).

We found the pneumatics information on Team 358’s website http://www.team358.org/files/pneumatic/
to be very helpful. We were starting from scratch with a box of legacy parts and we were able to put together and troubleshoot a basic system.