Hi,
Did you get upset when a breakaway game ended by a tie?? Yes, yes, yes…
When tere is a tie the game should be decided by a penalty kick like in soccer
Like the idea?? say yes!
I like that. One ball, two robots on the field (up to the alliances’ choosing). Offensive robot starts with ball in mid-zone; defensive robot starts in the far zone. Possession changes at 30 seconds or score, whichever comes first. Win by 2.
But only to be implemented in the elimination rounds.
I hate penalty kicks in soccer. I hate the shootout in hockey. And I would likely not be a fan of a “shootout” in Breakaway.
Draws are acceptable outcomes to matches. I don’t think a win or a loss should be decided by a “skills competition”.
Could be a fun event at an off season. Put up an open area, a net and one ball. A defensive team and an offensive team. 3 shots each or keep going until one team is up by one after both teams had their shot. Just for bragging rights though.
I think if there was a tie, the win should go to the team with a bonus score (Elevated Robot). IF there is no bonus, win goes to the team with the most autonomous goals. If there was a tie there, then let’s call it a tie.
Might be a good IRI change…
I liked the idea to do it in the off season.
This can be the Penalty Kick Award of the off season.
The draw is an important aspect of a soccer match.
The only time there is a penalty shootout to decide is when their must be a winner.
That’s a great idea, Justin.
On-Topic, I am not in favor of the shootout tiebreaker.
I didn’t like this year seeding system and most of all I do not like matches that ended with a tie
A little off-topic, this made me think of a fun off-season game: it would be like a kicking contest at like the NFL combine, each person kicks a distance and the ones that make it back up to the next distance, and they keep doing it till only 1 is left
What is the issue with matches that end in a tie? They were a great benefit to both alliances, but not quite as good as a win – and every tie game I saw (aside from the really low scoring ones) were very exciting to watch.
I agree that ties during qualification matches are fine. When they happen during the elimination rounds, however, some sort of sudden death or overtime might be better than replaying the entire match.
1 ball placed in the middle of the field.
6 robots (3 per side) all up against their alliance station walls.
Normal breakaway rules apply except for the starting position and no auton.
Sudden death - 1st alliance to score the ball wins.
I don’t have anything against ties, but this could be an interesting scenario…
Interesting idea, but post-regulation-time tiebreakers of any kind have the potential to screw up the match schedule in a big way. It’s one thing if it’s the only game going on in an arena that day (pro sport regular season) or much shorter than the game if there’s more than one (NCAA hoops tournament, world cup), but it’s different when you’ve got 60+ matches going off at 7 minute intervals in a single day.
I’m opposed to any tiebreakers that reward robot functions not necessarily rewarded in the game. People built their robots with specific strategic analysis in mind. It’s unfair to teams that decided not to hang to make elevation a tiebreaker, because that makes it more important than it was in the design phase. The same goes for shootouts and accurate ranged kicking.
Unless these tie breakers were in the original game manual. Then those teams DECIDED not to worry about those design requirements.
That’s my point. Since they weren’t in the original manual, teams made decisions they might not have made if this change was in the manual.
I have to agree with Chris is me here. I’m not a big fan of tie-breakers.
My team, as is the case with many other teams and especially rookie teams, does not have a kicker or a hanger. Forcing a single robot to take a ball from the midfield into the goal when it struggles to even pull itself over the bump is just cruel. Although this may not end up being the scenario of the tie-breaker, I think that telling a push-bot team that they have one shot on goal will not be easy to enforce unless you come up with a new meaning for the word “shot.”
Also, imagine a tie scenario where neither alliance scores during the entire match. Needless to say, it’s going to take a while for the teams to score a point if they couldn’t within the original 2:15 time limit. Not only would that throw off the match schedule, it would also frustrate all six teams on the field to no end.
I hate to be a naysayer, though. If someone comes up with a plausible way to break a tie fairly without favoring any robot which wouldn’t already be favored by the current rule system, I would be all for it and would be excited to see it implemented at the offseason events. Looking back at some of the ideas in this thread, Craig’s idea of one ball in the middle could potentially work, although it does make some hanger-bots worthless.
You would need a time limit to move out of the zone, otherwise two of your robots could park it
You start in your scoring zone - you’d want to block the opposite side of the field and you can only have one robot in the d-zone.
Again, I’m not promoting the idea - just thought it seemed interesting.