I say we have California vs. Everyone Else
Do we all qualify if we registered for the season and fielded a robot? I assume there’s more than enough room for all the active teams given the additional facility…
Suggestion - Cheddar division and Parmesan division.
With this new system, east coast teams’ dream of attending Chezy Champs affordably can finally be realized! Thanks Pofs!
Naw, Autobots and Decepticons would work better in my opinion.
Oh, what a friend we have in Chezes.
-dave
.
Naw, lets go with a “Chicken Little” and an “Orson Welles” Division…
I could not possibly love the Cheesy Poofs more than I do at this exact moment.
Especially for international teams, this will certainly make travel to the continent of North America less frustrating. I’m glad we can continue to propagate growth of our program in this way. My only hope is that the east and west champs never be allowed to play each other, this way we can have six winners, and forever be able to argue on CD about which alliance would do better in a theoretical head-to-head. Oh, and let’s cut the Chezy Champs Chairman’s clock in half so as not to make one trophy better than the other one.
Chezy Champs has come closer to us. This will make travelling less frustrating.
We are writing today with some exciting news!
Last summer, GameSense Coverage of Chezy Champs became a game changer in the FIRST world. Next year we’ll be debuting
Chezy¢ in honor of the occasion.
Since we are going to have to split our broadcasting crew, we promise to bring you twice the coverage at half the quality…
What at about Chezy Champs Super East and Super West?
Also, division names should be Corndog and/or Hawaiian Pizza.
edit:
THIS IS ALL I HAVE EVER WANTED IN MY LIFE. MY WHOLE LIFE HAS COME UP TO THIS.
Having twice as many teams see half the great teams… 1/2 * 2 = 1?
Having twice as many winners with half the victory… 1/2 * 2 = 1?
Having “half the best in the west” twice… 1/2 * 2 = 1?
Oh wait, that doesn’t work?!? Who’d have guessed inspiration doesn’t multiply that way?
Thank you for the best post I’ve read in a long time.
But then we’d have winners and losers, and we can’t have that, can we?
If anyone could contact whoever does those 2 puppets and could get them to do actual match commentary for champs would be a GOD!
Ooh, ooh, I have an idea! We can get major corporations to sponsor post-cheezy-season events all over the country! The can go through a selection process where they invite from the top ranked teams to their venues. We could call it the Plate Championship Series (PCS). After all, we play on a flat surface. There would be four of them, and the “real” Einstein field would rotate among the plates each year. They could have names, like The National Instruments Labview Plate. Or the AndyMark Rivet Plate. Just think how much more fun that will be than allowing all the teams to compete head to head until one winning alliance remains.
Everyone should pay attention to this post. If Travus learned how to spell and grammarize just to tell us this, it must be important.
It’s funny how FIRST is suddenly pushing “everyone is a winner” so much. If they want to push coopertition, why is almost every move they’ve made over the last few months seem to be in opposition to competition? (Also, enough finalist and winner medals for everyone on chairmans/regional winning teams would be nice, 45 medals for a 63-student team did not work well)
I think IRI should be thinking about how much more important they will be once all the powerhouses get split up at championships.
10/10 good read. Hopefully a MLG grand finals is in the works for Chezy Champs sometime in the future 