While talking to/working with other teams and/or reading stuff online, I’ve come across quite a few teams who don’t realize that (per G18) when you’re climbing you can’t extend more than 12" outside your frame perimeter, and that the penalty is a RED CARD when doing so to achieve a climb–the 12" extension rotates with your robot, so if you’re climbing with, say, a winch, and your robot pivots on the winch so that your bumpers tilt toward the vertical, you may be in big trouble.
I know, I know, it’s explicitly in the rules and called out in a blue box as an egregious penalty, but somehow a bunch of people are missing it…and I don’t want you to be those people. So either build a climber that’s robust enough that your robot doesn’t rotate with respect to it, or keep that flexible/floppy/winchy climber at or very very near your CG.
Yeah, part of our pre match checklist this year will be making sure our alliance partners don’t have a climb like that. If they do, they will be told not to climb.
Oddly enough, I think the climb would still count for the alliance (in quals), but the red carded team would of course get no RPs or tiebreaker points for their efforts… In elims, of course, it would be Very Bad Indeed™.
Points or no points, a red card on your alliance looks bad, regardless of if it is applied to your team. Although, that loophole is being added to my Q&A list for when I get around to pasting them all into the system.
Are you saying if the rope/hook used during climbing extends >12" outside the perimeter due to the robot rotating?
Sorry for my confusion. It’s early here.
Fixed for you 12” is the limit, I think adding the above helps with comprehension.
Essentially, if you send a strap up to the bar and winch it in from the front of your frame perimeter, the robot rotates as you climb. After rotation, but before finishing the climb, the plane of the bumpers is vertical, and the strap is extending along that plane more than 12”. That also applies during rotation, as the projection of the strap to the plane of the bumpers goes from being inside the frame perimeter, to outside, to more than 12”.
I don’t think these climbers would even pass inspection. Rule R4 says ‘Expect to have to demonstrate a ROBOT’S ability to constrain itself per above during
Inspection. Constraints may be implemented with either hardware or software.’
A climber like that doesn’t have any hardware or software constraints preventing overextension and probable wouldn’t pass inspection.
Yes. A vertical strap is fine for climbing, if the robot’s frame perimeter remains horizontal. But if the robot’s frame perimeter tilts significantly with respect to the horizontal, and the robot is at all some normal shape (as opposed to, say, 6" wide x 44" long), then there will very likely come a point where the strap/hook mechanism is more than 12" outside the frame perimeter. This is less of a concern for tall robots than short robots, but still a possible concern.