As context, this will be my fourth year in FRC, and I will be going off to college next year. Anonymous account so this blog reflects my views only and not those of my entire team.
An overemphasis on diversity causes more seperation in the long run. A seemingly impossible statement, but one becoming ever more true in the FRC world.
If you don’t want to read my personal experience and just skip to my argument, feel fee to gloss over this next paragraph.
Again, I’m a senior this year, and somehow despite all my time and effort poured into FRC I find myself without a leadership position or in charge of any even small part of the team. I’m part of what would be considered a fairly large team, and believe that despite this fact, the things I’ve contributed should definitly atleast allow me to design a Mechanism for this upcoming season. My freshman, sophmore, and part of my junior year, I was completely dedicated to software and coding, creating practically the whole vision system for our team’s bot, and creating the button mapping and commands for pilot and operator. In my junior year I also succeeded in getting into USACO gold (roughly top 500 of US HS coders). Then, I switched over to designing, completed a large part of the onshape training for FRC and in general, participated in a few random CADathons, and got an online internship with a small engineering company as a Mechanical Drafter. I’m not stating this to brag, but rather to show my competence in doing what I do. Despite all this, I didn’t get nominated to my team’s Dean’s List(understandable as only 2 people can get it), but what’s less understandable is not getting one of the 10 main leadership positions(excluding drive team), for controls and mechanisms. Meanwhile, where I’m especially mad is sophmores with much less expereince getting positions over me, considering the amount of time I poured into FRC both to fuel my passion for engineering and for college applications. It’s looking ever more likely that my dream schools are slipping right out of my grasp and there’s nothing I can do but just stand in the sidelines and watch.
Now, how does this link back into diversity? Let’s look at some teams and facts(courtesy friends from other teams I’ve made)
- A team where the driver is a girl every single year for the past decade (besides two years where there were no girls)
- A team with 3 developmental teams where the leadership is all girl for all 4 teams
- Where there’s events specifically catered to being girls only
- Teams where girls are given priority for tasks and opportunities are first handed out to them (i.e. whenever there’s smth to do, the girls are asked first)
- Teams where recruitment is specifically targetted towards girl, with team members claiming that guys will just naturally join regardless
- Back to me, where my fellow female teammates with less dedication and experience get the roles over me, and where the mentors specifically help them out over me, e.g. when I have a question it goes roughly unanswered until theirs are resolved
This seems to only be an issue in larger teams due to the fact that they are often not lacking in female membership or in marketing out their existence, so I would appreciate if no one answered saying “but the vast majority of people in FRC are guys”, because that A. doesn’t take in the leadership, or B. that robotics in small schools vastly tend to be 90% guys, and dont have the same marketing to attract different people.
Ultimately, I believe coaches in larger teams are over prioritizing girls in the team at the expense of probably the team itself, choosing people merely for the sake of their appearance rather than their skills or experience. Feel free to disagree with me and change my mind, but at the end of the day the hours I spent each week in robotics is just going to amount to nothing.
DISCLAIMER: What I’m doing here is simply pointing out an issue from as objective of a standpoint as I can, not taking away from any achievements of my fellow teammates or women in STEM in general.