[BTW: FIRST was once again predictable in their divisional assignments: Curie, Newton, Galileo, Archimedes | Curie, Newton, Galileo, Archimedes | etc ]
[BTW: You can see a list of teams for each division (directly from FIRST’s site) by clicking on one of the following links: Curie, Newton, Galileo, Archimedes]
This might be a stupid question, but say a team qualified this weekend and went to the championship, would it shift everyone down, and put everyone in a different division.
*Originally posted by Kyle Fenton *
**This might be a stupid question, but say a team qualified this weekend and went to the championship, would it shift everyone down, and put everyone in a different division. **
Very well could be, due to the method used to determine divisional assignments–just a 1,2,3,4 down the list. However, if I remember correctly, last year FIRST didn’t alter the division a team was placed in once they were released. Teams qualifying for the nationals after divisions were released simply got added to a division convenient in the eyes of FIRST.
FIRST hit the nail right on the head with these divisions. They seem to be almost dead even! Judging from what I see, some key autonomous races to the top I would love to see…
Archimedes: 157 vs. 111
Curie: 25 vs. 121, 16 vs. 126,
Galileo: 312 vs 175, and just about anyone else in that division!
Sweet!! 1077 is in the Galileo division. We pulled of Galileo Division champ’s in 2001 with 59. Maybe we can pull it off this year as well. This is going to be fun!
The last time we were in Galileo (2001) we were divisional runner up and #1 seed, so hopefully we will continue the lucky streak there and go farther.
Also, I believe Joel is right, divisions won’t change. The qualifiers will just be added on. I think this is what happened in 2002, or thats what FIRST planned on doing in 2002