After my team discussed this and I posted here. I figured I should ask the Q&A if extending a pole up from the driver station and having a bird’s eye view of the field would be legal. To my surprise, they said yes it is legal.
Adding onto this: does anyone know if it is legal to mount a camera on the catwalk of a venue, process the image on a computer, then communicate via bluetooth to another computer, say a pi, on the robot or driver station?
By the rules: T4 Teams may not set up their own 802.11a/b/g/n/ac (2.4GHz or 5GHz) wireless communication (e.g. access points or ad-hoc
networks) in the venue.
That is illegal make sure to read the entire manual.
R84 Other than the system provided by the ARENA, no other form of wireless communications shall be used to communicate to, from, or within the OPERATOR CONSOLE.
R52 No form of wireless communication shall be used to communicate to, from, or within the ROBOT, except those required per R46 and R51 (e.g. radio modems from previous FIRST competitions and Bluetooth devices are not permitted on the ROBOT
during competition).
Thanks for asking this! Really opens up some interesting possibilities.
Is Q&A generally flooded with questions that have already been answered earlier on? It’s kind of annoying to have pages of the same question that were answered on the first page.
To quote the GDC, “There are no rules that prohibit this.” I see no difference between this and the cheesy-vision that 254 used last year. All feed info to the robot originating with video.
I don’t agree with that statement. cheesy-vision gave the robot information for autonomous, which goal is hot. This simply, potentially, gives the drivers a better look at the field. I could see this being used for some interesting autonomous routines, but I don’t think that will happen.