Festival of Champions: Right and Wrong

FIRST General Forum
#44

Well, I can say from first-hand experience that the issue in match two for 1676 was definitely not a comm issue, but a wiring issue.

Having gone through it all, I think the experience was awesome. The tour of DEKA was a little underwhelming, but in retrospect I don’t think seeing a cube farm would have made it much better. However the guy who spoke to us was very interesting.

The party at Dean’s house was really cool, not so much for seeing his house (which is really neat) but for seeing friends from around the country. But I never did get to see “the door” at FIRST.

As for the tournament itself: wow. What a high-level of matchplay. The production values were adequate. I only wish seating was slightly more plentiful on the lower level. Worth both my time and my money.

#45

I was in attendance as a Dean’s List parent/mentor.

Aside from the stuff that’s been mentioned before (specifically sound, need for it to exist in the first place, FTC live scoring), I thought it went off really well.

FTC had an exciting game this year, and I was happy to see it getting some recognition.

Minor nitpicks:

For the pre-show, some of us had been standing around for a couple of hours through the rehearsals and it was difficult to tell if the pre-show (with the police chief, Air Force award to Dean, etc.) was a pre-show or still a rehearsal.

Nobody else probably even noticed this, but I was disappointed that only 14 of the 20 Dean’s list winners were recognized in the broadcast (they left out the 6 FRC winners from Houston).

I was surprised they didn’t show the game explanation videos. If someone randomly tuned in on twitch they would’ve been totally lost. (That being said, they may have been totally lost even if they saw the scoring rules.)

FTC live scoring is a mess. I was able to ask an FTC GDC member about it and they are working on some ideas. Without the efforts of one of the FTC teams we wouldn’t have even had the modest live scoring (or shot-counting – not really scoring) that was seen at Supers and Worlds this year. It would make it much more spectator-friendly.

But, overall, it was a great experience. I wouldn’t travel a long distance to attend again (unless we were magically one of those teams that qualified), but I would watch online.

#46

This sentence makes me sad.

#47

Obviously this would need to happen pretty far down the road, but in my mind as we have more teams, especially at the highest levels #2champs will become #3champs, and then #4champs, and on and on. As these levels of competition grow, each of the championships will become more like super regionals (for example, West Coast Super regional), at which point all of the winners will come to play at an event in between the 10 team FOC and 600 team Champs where they will play some kind of event (either mix it up or a crazy hype elimination tournament with same alliances) to decide the true winner. By doing so there won’t be confusion about who is the true world champ or what that even means, but teams can still take pride on championing the West Coast, running with the same example. This will also enable FIRST to raise the hype level of the event by a ton, give teams more reason to watch (cheer on the winners of their super regional who they more directly interacted/competed with), and get the level of excitement to the level of a potentially televised event.

Essentially, turn every champs division into its own super regional and have all of the winners come to play in a final showdown like FOC on a larger scale.

#48

I don’t think the students were terribly upset about it, at least the ones I know about. They had a great time and this was just a minor issue in an otherwise fantastic weekend. They were recognized before at St. Louis/Houston in front of a much larger audience, anyway.

(Probably their parents and grandparents were more annoyed about it than the students).

#49

I loved that this was a big step in promoting FTC more heavily. Obviously, we need better live scoring… Also, I wish they’d just show the FTC game video to the spectators… I think that could solve a lot of the confusion about the game. (That being said, I think the FTC game was easier to jump into than Steamworks. I had a hard time explaining Steamworks to my FTC kiddos at IRI. I also think it’s sad that these kids work so hard in FTC and don’t get representation like FRC does. My kids work just as hard as FRC kids, so I’m glad to see FIRST stepping it up.)

I also agree with the comments about it taking away the marathon aspect. There’s nothing like going into the finals after a brutal day of qualifiers and then elims.

FIRST HQ, FTC livescoring is a must. You have the capability to do it, so… Do it.

#50

Oh, I noticed it. When that happened, I thought that something had just skipped over in the broadcast or that I’d just gone crazy. That was definitely a mistake on FIRST’s part, but I imagine that the Houston Dean’s List winners aren’t extraordinarily affected by this.

#51

This. 1000x this.

#52

I do feel like they missed a big opportunity to expand this event out to the non-FRC community, either by putting it on TV or something else. Its such a small event, with such big implications, that I feel like it was a bit wasted only seeing the ~700 or so people on the twitch live stream (It fluctuated at times, but I remember seeing about 700 viewers.)

I liked how they combined the FRC and FTC matches into one live stream. Until that stream, I have never even seen a full FTC match, so it was interesting to see the other sides of FIRST.

I have high hopes for the future of the FoC. Seems like a necessity, especially since the number of world championships will only continue to increase further into the future.

#53

Yes, please make that the norm. If they are ready, start the match.

#54

In this format I agree, you have the same alliances in consecutive matches. At a regional or district event, however, I would still want the MC to introduce each team. First, we have guests that attend for only part of the event, and the introduction may be “new” to them. Second, it’s not the same teams as last match.

For elims, until the finals, I believe one “large” introduction for each team, at each level, is appropriate, and a “short” introduction of the alliance (if a backup hasn’t swapped in) in subsequent matches would be fine. In finals, I do like the one and done introductions, again, unless a backup is subbed in, then perhaps reintroduce all the teams in short form (to keep it even).

#55

I don’t mind full intro in the finals. We aren’t going to be there much longer and it gives the final a more epic feel.
Kathik’s lengthy history lesson introductions are worth attending the event alone.

#56

I think the best way to lay this out is a standard introduction of each team in their first match of quarters, and then have a big introduction with sponsors and how many times 254 has won SVR. I seem to recall this was really well done when 1678, 148, 364, and 2990 (sorry if I messed any of that up) played together in the 2016 Hopper Finals. Watching the matches really gave the whole audience a peek into each individual team as well as the history between 1678/148 and their opponents 1323 and 971. If we had seen that before every match, I would be asleep. But in the finals, that story had me on the edge of my seat. Obviously not everyone has crazy connections or a story like that, but with good announcing I think it can be done well just in finals after brief intros in quarters.

Mad props to whoever that announcer was!!

#57

I think we should keep the introductions before each match, but it should be tweaked. As it has been mentioned many times, the field is often ready to start the match, but we are waiting to introduce the teams. What if right after the final scores are announced, with everyone’s attention on the big screen, we begin the introductions for the next match. The MC could announce the teams and the screen could show information about each team such as team number, name, sponsors, current rank, current record, and even a picture of robot. This would reduce cycle times and, I think, would be more interesting than watching the MC point to each drive team on the other side of the glass.

I also think the FoC should be best out of 7 matches.

#58

That’s really on the MC though - a good MC monitors the FMS status screen at the score desk and should have a feel for when to introduce teams. Often times you can’t wait for all of those to hit green before introducing teams and I’ve had many times they still aren’t green by the time I’ve finished introducing them. New / inexperienced MC’s should be mentored on the FMS screen and use it to get a feel for when it’s time to go introduce teams.

#59

Good Guy Frank emailed them and apologized that they were left out, and promised that they’d make sure it doesn’t happen again in the future. I think that’s about all you can do in this case. Production flub-ups on a live event are likely to happen.

#60

Speaking of Good Guy Frank*, he emailed me a photo of “The Door”, apparently after reading my post. This is why I love him like a brother.

Don

*That is how I will reference him from this day forward.

.

#61

Could you see through “The Door”?
It’s what’s on the other side that matters most…

#62

I totally forgot to look for “The Door!” Maybe next time.

#63

Even though I’m a pretty big sports fan I hardly ever watch the full “probowl/allstar” game itself. What I do love watching though is the “skills” competitions that each event has (home run debry, slam dunk contest, qb comp., slap shot speed etc.). I think it would be anazing and add to production value if you took probably the finalists from each Einstein field and did skills challenges early and finished with a single match round robin type final. Think about it you could have had a shoot out between 1986/254, or a drive off between 2767/1678.