After a year’s absence, it’s time to bring back the Championship Free-For-All draft! (Props to Joe Ross for inventing the format.)
You can pick any three teams competing at the 2011 Championship, however you can not pick the same three teams that someone else has picked . (So if I pick 11, 148, and 2815, you can still pick 11, 148, and 217…but you can’t do 11/148/2815.)
Of note:
Standard Championship Fantasy FIRST scoring will apply.
Cross-division picks are perfectly fine.
When listing your picks, put them in ascending team number order
Place your picks on the list sorted by your first team’s number, then your second, then your third. (So 11/148/217, then 11/217/2815, then 16/20/45.)
The deadline for picks is midnight Wednesday night Eastern
Your last pick is the one that gets scored.
Track the mayhem here: https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AuKhRcDxMghsdHRTR005T2pLLTRCLW5wQXc4enFsa1E&hl=en
With all that out of the way, I’ll begin with…
Billfred: 111/148/1114
Billfred: 111/148/1114
Haven’t been on CD in a while… so I’ll pick 33, 245 and – what the heck, let’s keep the MI trend going – 217.
Billfred: 111/148/1114
Billfred:
After a year’s absence, it’s time to bring back the Championship Free-For-All draft! (Props to Joe Ross for inventing the format.)
You can pick any three teams competing at the 2011 Championship, however you can not pick the same three teams that someone else has picked . (So if I pick 11, 148, and 2815, you can still pick 11, 148, and 217…but you can’t do 11/148/2815.)
Of note:
Standard Championship Fantasy FIRST scoring will apply.
Cross-division picks are perfectly fine.
When listing your picks, put them in ascending team number order
The deadline for picks is midnight Wednesday night Eastern
Track the mayhem here: https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AuKhRcDxMghsdHRTR005T2pLLTRCLW5wQXc4enFsa1E&hl=en
With all that out of the way, I’ll begin with…
Billfred: 111/148/1114
I think point 4 needs to be clairified because it confused me and the last two posters did not follow it.
Since Q’s lowest team is 33, which is lower than Billfred’s 111 and my 359, he is on top of the list.
Q. Sheets: 33/217/245
Akash and Billfred both have 111, so it goes to the second team. Since 148 is lower than 1114, Billfred is first.
Q. Sheets: 33/217/245
I think point 4 needs to be clairified because it confused me and the last two posters did not follow it.
Since Q’s lowerst team is 33, which is lower than Billfred’s 111 and my 359, he is on top of the list.
Q. Sheets: 33/217/245
Akash and Billfred both have 111, so it goes to the second team. Since 148 is lower than 1114, Billfred is first.
Q. Sheets: 33/217/245
This. (It’s more of a convenience thing for future pickers. While any conflicts will come to light when the spreadsheet is updated, why risk that I’ll update it too late for you to correct it?)
dodar
April 21, 2011, 9:34pm
7
Sheets: 33/217/245
CIM
April 21, 2011, 9:42pm
8
Sheets: 33/217/245
Sheets: 33/217/245
Sheets: 33/217/245
Sheets: 33/217/245
Can I get a link to the “standard scoring?”
Biancs 15: 33/111/1114
EricH
April 22, 2011, 1:37am
14
Biancs 15: 33/111/1114
“Standard Scoring” would be a reference to the Season Long scoring system. W-L-T, 2-0-1 points. Seeding is 20 for 1st seed, 12 for second and third, 6 for the rest of the top 8, 3 for 9-12, and 2 for anybody else at or above 16. Then the awards change to:
[FONT="]Quarter finalists – Division, 5 points
Chairman’s – Nationals, 80 points
Highest score / Highest Rookie Seed, 10 points
Biancs 15…33 111 1114
jblay
April 22, 2011, 1:10pm
17
Biancs 15…33 111 1114
Thanks Eric for scoring - fixing locations for names.
Biancs 15…33 111 1114
Biancs 15…33 111 1114
BJC
April 22, 2011, 3:51pm
20
Biancs 15…33 111 1114BJC…33 1114 2056