Alamo 1: 1477 for 2843
CT: 2836 for 237
in order of course
Per 78, can we just pretend I never submitted a waiver request, and give me back 2836? Or is that not really the way things go?
If not, then
Connecticut: 2836 for 78
I would be fine with that (read: you can ignore my request for the team if you do that)
I have an idea I would like to submit. In the case of San Diego and Conneticut, where someone is missing a team and there are teams on wire.
The person missing a team can pull from the pile. Otherwise they can grab a team off of waiver but go to the bottom of the waiver list.
Not sure if this is the same thing, but why not make it a regular waiver pick, but give priority to players trading away a team that dropped. if it’s the same, I could definitely see that as the most reasonable solution.
That’s the way originally suggested–players missing teams go higher on the list in those tiers.
Awright, here’s the scoop.
Ed is missing 2673 in Detroit.
Basel already noticed 78’s absence.
dodar should notice 568’s absence from San Diego shortly.
Other than those three and Barry (548, West MI 2), nobody’s missing any teams to my knowledge.
They can grab any available team, waiver or no, in that tier. Should that team be on the waiver list, they go to the bottom of the list; otherwise, the list doesn’t change. The missing team takes precedence over any waiver claims submitted. Is that fair enough for everyone?
Note: If no claim is made by someone missing a team before waivers are processed, then all waiver claims are valid and will be processed accordingly.
You get 2836 in CT and go to bottom of the waiver list.
- Karibou
- Bethany Mc.
- Tim Delles
- dodar
- Koko Ed
- Barry Bonzack
- Josh Fox
- EricH
- Vikesrock
- Chris is me
- rtfgnow
- Basel A
- Karibou
- Bethany Mc.
- Tim Delles
- dodar
- Koko Ed
- Barry Bonzack
- Josh Fox
- Vikesrock
- Chris is me
- Basel A
- rtfgnow
- EricH
EricH
1477 for 457 in Alamo 1
522 for 1672 in New Jersey
rtfgnow
2415 for 1539 in North Carolina
waivers for 1/16
Alamo 1: 118 457
Alamo 2: 118
Waterford 1: 862 2673
Waterford 2: 862 2673
New Jersey: 1672
North Carolina: 1539
Kansas City: 476
St. Louis 1: 2014
St. Louis 2: 2014
Detroit: 2832
West Michigan: 2245
3123 dropped New Jersey
3631 dropped Alamo
3873 dropped Florida
2834 dropped Waterford
3076 dropped Israel
2038 dropped Peachtree
862 dropped West Michigan
I got up to the Seattle events before the FIRST page broke down on me. I will try again later.
More 1/16 waivers.
Washington: 1086
Oregon: 2517
10,000 Lakes: 3883
Troy: 322
Colorado: 499
108 dropped Palmetto.
2245 dropped Niles.
293 dropped Connecticut.
852 dropped Oregon.
3541, 3543, 3590, and 3683 all dropped Toronto East.
1514, 2670 and 3563 dropped Toronto West.
322 dropped Livonia.
225 dropped Philadelphia.
DC: 1086 for 2914 top priority
I think this should be 3883.
Corrected.
Seattle is getting a large realignment. It may be that GTR is as well, but that’s neither here nor there.
It may be reasonable to deal with the realignment differently than standard procedure. Here’s what I’m thinking:
Should a player have a team that they would like to keep switch events, they get first claim for that team in the event switched to. If there are two such teams in a player’s alliances, one at each event, they may simply be traded between events. If a player doesn’t choose to keep a team that switches, they can indicate that and use the missing teams priority (which would be second to the switching events priority).
Thoughts?
- Karibou
- Bethany Mc.
- Tim Delles
- dodar
- Koko Ed
- Barry Bonzack
- Josh Fox
- Basel A
- EricH
- Chris is me
- Vikesrock
- rtfgnow
Vikesrock
1086 for 3455 in DC
118 for 245 in Alamo 2
Chris is me
106 for 2914 in DC
rtfgnow
118 for 3103 in Alamo 1
2673 and 862 for 2851 and missing in Waterford
499 for 1799 in Colorado
Waiver until 1/23:
Alamo 1: 3103
Alamo 2: 245
Colorado: 1799
Washington DC: 2914 3455
Waterford 1: 2851
Waterford 2: 1596
I don’t feel like going through the event list and finding added teams. Will someone be willing to do this before midnight?