I was rather bored in study hall the other day and for some reason started doodling a FIRST logo. As I drew it I had an epiphany: There something hidden in the logo! Consider this image:
And look at the number of sides of each shape.
Triangle: 3
Circle: 1 continuous side
Square: 4
314…? Doesn’t that look a bit like… 3.14?! The FIRST logo is a symbolic representation of Pi! If only the ® symbol came after the triangle somehow. It would be a great decimal.
Now, I don’t know if this was done on purpose, but I’d love to think it was. What do you guys think? Great coincidence, or conspiracy of mathematical proportions?
Very nice discovery. I don’t think they could have done it in propose, the red triangle in the left is probably positioned that way for aesthetic reasons. Remember that the old FIRST logo had a triangle in the left too.
However, whether a circle has a side or even a continuous one is highly ambiguous.
EDIT: I can argue that a circle can have two sides, one in the outside and one in the inside.
I am familiar of the FIRST logo, but I think the question imposed here is what does the FIRST logo have to do with the mathematical constant Pi? And Archimedes came up with the constant Pi.
Sorry to be a buzz kill, but technically a circle has infinitely many sides.
P.S. Down with Pi! All hail Tau!
(As it is 3 o’clock in the morning I’m not going to give a lengthy explanation but basically Tau = 2Pi. Google it to find out all the ways this make so much more sense than using Pi, G’night everyone)
1: I wasn’t entirely sure of the technical number of sides of a circle, so I figured since the angle changes constantly but without variation (unlike polygons that have corners) then it only has one side. But to be honest I’m a conspiracy theorist. I bend these things so they fit
2: That was a fascinating video about the origins of the logo- very informative. I vaguely recall learning about that relationship but never realized that it applied to the logo.
3: “Down with pi, all hail Tau”- Totally with you! Have you watched any videos by Vihart on YouTube? She has an excellent explanation of why we should switch.
And, I know it’s not actually a conspiracy, just an interesting discovery. My conspiracy-self is a facetious sensationalist.