(QP Rounds only)
Will 2X check the GL, NY, and LI regionals, but
Florida Regional now owns
Also at Florida:
had 5 matches w/ stack of 8
had 3 matches w/ stack of 7
No DQ in any match
Also Team 176 now has 21 wins in QP rounds…best in nation
Since when did the Floridians get so good? 
Usually UTC has the high scores…
yeah go UCF regional participants!!! Especially those from SOUTH FLORIDA!!! (all the winning teams from S. Florida…and so is S.P.A.M. but its mainly for the winners!!!)
*Originally posted by soap108 *
Usually UTC has the high scores…
UTC…hmm…176, 179, and 180 are UTC teams, does that count? maybe we took the luck with us and ran (like took it last year). 179 and 180, we’re from S. FL but 176 cam from CT. Oh, luck is the one thing you never tell your sponsors…the luck of the draw. Thank you 176 for picking us!
*Originally posted by soap108 *
**(QP Rounds only)Will 2X check the GL, NY, and LI regionals, but
Florida Regional now owns
- Top 3 QP Totals (and 5 of top 9)
- Top 2 Scores (and 4 of top 7)
Also at Florida:
had 5 matches w/ stack of 8
had 3 matches w/ stack of 7
No DQ in any match
Also Team 176 now has 21 wins in QP rounds…best in nation
Since when did the Floridians get so good?
Usually UTC has the high scores…
KA-108
www.soap108.com/2003/stats/superlatives/ **
I’m beginning to think there should be a win % or a win/loss ratio displayed also… for yes 176 has the greatest number of wins, but 358, the second place team has alot less losses… I dunno, in my mind it makes them better than 176 (90% win rate out of 20 vs. 70% win rate out of 30). Or better yet, the data could be normalized
agreed, I think it would be best if the number of wins and losses simply be divided by the number of competitions a team attends. It makes the data easier to interpret.
*Originally posted by MRL180YTL2002 *
**UTC…hmm…176, 179, and 180 are UTC teams, does that count? **
UTC Regional, not teams…
*Originally posted by Joel J. *
**I’m beginning to think there should be a win % or a win/loss ratio displayed also… for yes 176 has the greatest number of wins, but 358, the second place team has alot less losses… I dunno, in my mind it makes them better than 176 (90% win rate out of 20 vs. 70% win rate out of 30). Or better yet, the data could be normalized**
Yeah, 21 wins comes with going to three regionals…
But on the flip side, doesn’t a team that’s 21-9 deserve a little bit more props than a 6-0 team? Ah, whatever…
KA-Moto108 
I would prefer to have them both, as seperate statistics 
