Frc 2025 Coral holder?

I have an idea about how to take coral and score, but my approach is only avaible for two stages. I’m new to CAD designing, so does anyone have any ideas about my CAD? How can I improve it, or is there anything wrong with it?

My Cad(i fixed the link):

Explonation of my cad:

in there we have a telescopic cascade system. It can take coral from human player when its closed. But when you raise the system it falls down and it can score coral to reef. I didn’t add the pieces of angle. And in my cad i didn’t do the calculations. What do u think guys?

6 Likes

1 Like

I don’t think it’s a bad idea, but if you intent on using a redline as I see in the CAD, you’re going to have to be careful, since they’re designed to run at full power to have sufficient cooling. If you intend it to run at a really low speed to hold the piece on, you might run into issues with the redline overheating.

4 Likes

Thanks for the feedback. Which engine would you recommend I use? Or can I solve this by playing with the ratio?

use a bag motor if you have access to any, if not just make the ratio as big as you reasonably can, also probably want to use 1/4" plastic plates instead of 1/16" AL there, more for dimensional stability than anything. Remember to add “cooling slots” for the cooling ports on the front of the 775 so it can get proper airflow.

1 Like

Actually, we are afraid to do it with plastic because we’ve been breaking our intake in regionals for the last 3 years. :pensive: Thank you for your kind advice, it will truly helpful.

I developed the cad.

image

I added cooling ports to the front of the 755.

I replaced the steel plates with 1/4-inch ABS plates. This change will reduce the weight and make it more stable. I also added some churo to make it more durable.

What else can I do besides applying tape to reduce the impact of the coral hitting the part holding the rod

Increase the belt reduction, those wheels are REALLY fast as is

Add provisions for a proximity sensor to determine if the holder has coral in it.

4 Likes

Do you think a 12/48 ratio is sufficient?

I strongly suggest that don’t using Rs-775 Redline motor in your robot. It can cause big problems. You can’t get enough performance and you won’t be able to get motor datas accurately. I recommend that at least use a Neo v2 or Neo 550 motor in your system. Especially on top of your robot that Rs 775 will cause problems in wiring, use strong motors for durability.

1 Like

I think using a gripper will be better if you design your elevator or telescoping mechanism perfectly.

1 Like

I have the exact opposite reaction here…

a redline is not a bad choice, a bag would probably be better, but redlines are:

  • light
  • cheap
  • minimal wiring
  • packages small
  • there is no need for 5 gigawatts of power in this application
  • it will be run intermittently at low power (just make sure you have a safety cutoff for power over x% for t seconds in code, or just don’t give it much juice, it won’t need much)
2 Likes

What type of plastic did you use in previous years?

We used pleksiglass :frowning:

So plexiglass is the common brand name for clear acrylic, which you definitely do not want to use on your robot basically anywhere as it is prone to shattering on impact.

Most clear plastic that teams use here is polycarbonate, sometimes shortened to polycarb, and sometimes called the brand names Lexan, or Makrolon. This usually won’t shatter under normal conditions and can take a beating. If it does shatter, it’s usually because loctite or another chemical has gotten on to it and messed it up.

3 Likes

I didn’t know that loctite damaged polycarbonate. Thank you for the information. In the Charged up season, we used plexiglass and it broke during the competition. Then we used 6mm polycarbonate in Crescendo, and it broke too(we used loctite on polycarbonate). This is why we are afraid of plastic, polycarbonate, and plexiglass plates.