It’s a definate toss-up between M and Roger’s designs, while Maddie has simplicity, Roger has that cool, “weird stuff in the backround” look. It all depends on whats pleasing to your’e eye.
*Originally posted by RogerR *
**M’s submition is qoin’ to be a hard act to follow, but here’s mine anyways: **
I really like how the black border around the logo looks. It defines it and makes it jump off the page like a pin or something.
Very cool. I also like the header. It’s still reasonably simple, but offers more visual interest.
I believe tha both M’s and Roger’s submissions are wonderful. Exactly how I was trying to explain in a non-technical way in my first post. 
M’s has a deffinate sleekness and smoothness of coninuation. However, at the same time, Roger’s has a it more ‘flavor’ to it with the texture. I really don’t have a favorite of the two. It may depend on how much other activity you have on the page as to wether or not you would want a header with texture.
… just my thoughts …
I like the added detail of Roger’s submission. It has a little more visual flair, but not too much. It’s not too fancy, but not too plain.
ok, back again…
the only qualm i have with it (mine) is that it uses blue so much. the only other color that would be approprieate would be red.
here it is in “red” (closer to orange, and desaturated a bit to get rid of pink highlights)
I really like M Krass’s now that I’ve looked at it some more. There is a good sized area for us to put a banner ad in there for our sponsors, and to link to teams, and even bring in some more funding for the FSN.
Nice touch with the CD portal page in the background 
*Originally posted by apk *
**Nice touch with the CD portal page in the background
wondered if anyone would notice…
i couldn’t help myself.
if this header does end up being used, i would need to find a better image for the background, this one is to pixilated, and lacks any good contrast.
*Originally posted by RogerR *
**wondered if anyone would notice…
i couldn’t help myself.
if this header does end up being used, i would need to find a better image for the background, this one is to pixilated, and lacks any good contrast. **
haha. website cameos. awesome.
I like both, pretty much equally. One suggestion, for Rogers … change the solid blue in the menu to fit the header better. It doesn’t seem to go with the header as well as it does with M’s header.
*Originally posted by RogerR *
**ok, back again…
the only qualm i have with it (mine) is that it uses blue so much. the only other color that would be approprieate would be red.
here it is in “red” (closer to orange, and desaturated a bit to get rid of pink highlights) **
Ok i dont know if its just me but the blue and red title blocks jsut dont mix, if you could do a fade between the colors instead of just changing them instantly, it would look better, IMO.
~Mike
*Originally posted by dez250 *
Ok i dont know if its just me but the blue and red title blocks jsut dont mix, if you could do a fade between the colors instead of just changing them instantly
i’m not quite sure what you mean, and i’d rather not put another header up (since i’ve already posted 2…) without a sure idea of what is wanted