Ok all… from This Thread, the top 6 logos are here.
Below are the Choices. You may vote on your top 1. I know, they all are good, but you can only vote on 1. If you’d like to, you may also post a reply explaining your reasons.
I like 1,2, and 5 myself. I think 6 looks almost ugly, a bit too plain for me. Why does it have to say FIRST Scouting Network? we have been referring to it as FSN. Do we always spell out FIRST? Nope, we type FIRST, not For Inspiriation and Recognition of Science and Technology.
-It’s simple
-It’s easy to recognize
-It’s compact
I think those are the key elements we need in a logo. As much as I liked my number 3, and all the others, I think #2 fits the needs of the logo better. The others are just too complex.
Everyone who has still yet to vote should keep in mind that these logos have to go on different things. Both web and print and possibly in other things. So they need to be able to reproduced in high quality at low resolution or high resolution and still hold up after being photocopied 10 times.
i’d have to say my choice is number two, because of the reasons that many people have said- its simplistic, but not boringly so. it catches people’s eyes and is visually interesting, easily recognizable. looks fine in color or black and white. as much as i like the first design, i think it’s slightly complicated and large; whereas the second has a variable size and even color, if necessary, and would still be easy to see as the fsn logo. and i definitely think an acronym’s necessary, if only because of space constraints- and at this point, i think most people would be able to recognize FIRST Scouting Network as FSN.
I also agree with #2 because it would be easy to put into Max or some other 3D-Art program for animations and such… should you so choose to for some reason