Thought I would share this if anyone wasn;t aware.
Today the new parts in the Tetrix kit were released.
New parts consist of:
Continuous Rotation Servo
Tread Rubber Inserts
Tread Conveyor
Tread Idler Wheels
Tread Sprocket
Tread Links
Tread Kits
4" Omni-Wheels
Tread Accessory Pack (which I am having trouble figuring out what is in this “pack”)
The Tread Accessory pack will consist of paddel’s for turning your tread system into a conveyor and rubber inserts for the treads. Also a new thermal protected DC Motor power cable will be an added as a new part.
I noticed that the continuous rotation servo does not have position feedback. Am I correct in understanding this means that I can only tell the servo to go forward or backward and not to go to a specific point? Or am I misunderstanding what this means.
We did this to a couple position servos when I was in highschool. Basically, you break the internal feedback loop and remove the hard stops and it turns into something that approximates a normal motor.
I agree that it likely doesn’t deserve the “servo” moniker at this point: It looks like a servo, talks like a servo, but doesn’t quack like one. Not sure what I would call it. “Motor with integrated control electronics” doesn’t sound as sexy as “continuous rotation servo”
This is not a facetious question; I know of an FTC team that’s actually looking for the answer to this.
Are the new tank treads close enough to the Vex tank treads in size, shape, etc. that they can use the Vex tank tread links in their place? I think the rules permit “duplicates” like that. They’re looking to save a little bit of cash for a particular feature and want to only buy the sprockets, and they look similar enough that I figure it’s worth asking, but since I / they don’t have any new tread material in hand they can’t really compare the two.
Sadly the rule with using VEX parts in FTC was removed last year. Using VEX tread would be illegal even if they had the same size link.
“g. Vex parts of any type are not allowed.”
Sorry for the bad news on that aspect.
But what they could do is look for a sponsor or something to donate some money. We got $1800 donated from things that were in our build space for FRC.
I agree that FTC parts are a little on the expensive side, which is why our team tries to avoid modifying them at all cost.
That’s a bit disappointing. I thought I read a rule about “identical replacement parts” or something, but after a second read through I can’t find it. There goes $70…
OK - I’ll ask… Can anyone tell me why they would call this gizmo a “Servo” instead of calling it a motor? Maybe to pander to some RC enthusiasts that call any motor (except the main drive motor for a vehicle) a Servo? I’m confused.
Do the currrent rules allow replacement parts of any sort?
If we could use identical parts I’d think we would just buy gear stock instead of gears from Tetrix. We however can use identical hardware from anywhere in any length which will come in handy im sure.
Same size, shape, mass, surface finish, function, etc. parts gotten from a retailer/OEM other than Pitsco/Tetrix (I’m not sure if either Pisco or Terix are OEMs, but let’s give them the benfit of the doubt in this conversation). The classic example is substitute screws bought from a local hardware store.
“Substitute” would have been a better choice of words on my part.
Generally the rules has been No you can’t. You have to use tetrix parts or anything that they specify that can be used. Otherwise there isnt much straying from the kit sadly…