I wont be surprised if 610 has a working 30pt climber week 4 in Waterloo. Remember, they’ve got a power takeoff they’re not using right now.
EDIT: Also, 2056 at least has said on CD that they’re not climbing. I’ll believe it when I see it.
From my analytics file, here are the best scores by how they scored it
Best Auton:
Rochester Q12 - 191 3838 145 auton for 48
Best Climb:
BAE Granite State Q18 - 175 213 1277 climb for 60
Best Teleop:
BAE Granite State Q12 - 230 610 1922 Teleop for 90
They said that they were not “hanging” not that they weren’t climbing.
762 at flr at the end of autonomous at q27 by the blue alliance
Yep, real time scoring needs a bit of work.
Yep
(Final was 42 Blue, Red 32)
Stop to think of it, I wonder if that 762 was a chain falling down onto the sensor?
I’m pretty doubtful a chain weighs as much as ~254 frisbees…
762 / 6 = ~127 frisbees (auto, remember). 180g * 127 = 22,860g, or nearly 23kg ~= 46.6lbs… yeah, you’re right.
More likely the bottom of the goal, i.e. the scale, got stuck somehow.
Out of curiosity: What is the average score of the matches so far? How many points would you assume a team needs to get to move on to elims in an average regional?
Average scores so far:
- BAE: 54
- FLR: 43
- Traverse: 38
- Kettering: 38
- Palmeto: 36
*]Hub City: 32
Does that include practice matches?
Sounds like a strong autonomous (18pts) plus a 30 point summit sans dump would win you a majority of your matches. On a different note, a 7 disc autonomous would win you the match before you even touch the controls…
But if those averages include practices they are not a true indicator of scores. I know we personally will not be scoring as much during practices as we will be taking it slower due to no practice for our drivers this year…and we also need to get our autonomous set up :ahh:
Those are real honest to goodness matches.
Practice matches don’t really have scores.
Refs practice giving red cards and fouls.
Refs aren’t there to score climbs or assess real fouls.
Teams climb the wrong pyramid so they can see better how their mechanisms are working.
Most teams don’t even show up to practice matches until the afternoon.
And most of all FIRST doesn’t bother publishing practice match scores, only real scores.
Given the data that Mark McLeod usually posts, I wouldn’t have expected him to include practice matches. His data is always spot on accurate, and never includes “fluffy data.”
I’m curious, Mark, do you know what the score is right now that would put a team into the 90th percentile? IE the minimum score per match that would almost guarantee you walk away undefeated?
We had a few initial hiccups, but now we are up at about 60% a match with defense. You probably stopped watching but we had 57 disk points by ourselves in one match later that day.
Wouldn’t that just be 2 standard deviations above the mean, assuming a normal distribution of scores?
2 Standard deviations would be ~98%, but assuming a FIRST game has normally distributed alliances is a dangerous game. :eek: (although this year is actually not bad!)
From the actual distribution:
1% 0
5% 3
10% 10
25% 21
50% 37
75% 59
90% 77
95% 88
99% 129
