Houston Einstein Alliances/Results Predictions

Since it sounds fun, I’m starting a thread for Einstien alliance predictions. This thread is for Houston, and the rules are as follows:

For each division, pick the 2 robots (captain and first pick) that will be on the finalist alliance and winning alliance.

Then, pick the W/L records of each alliance in the round robin playoffs and the two alliances that advance to the finals. Finally, pick the winner of the two and how many matches it takes for the winner to be declared.

Here’s mine:

Carver: 16/1690 defeats 1477/4265
Galileo: 1574/4613 defeats 330/1986
Hopper: 254/148 defeats 180/359
Newton: 118/1678 defeats 3309/3310
Roebling: 1323/179 defeats 1983/3476
Turing: 2471/842 defeats 1538/987

Seeding:

1 Hopper 4/1/0 (loss to Roebling)
2 Roebling 4/1/0 (loss to Newton)
3 Turing 3/2/0 (loss to Hopper and Roebling)
4 Newton 3/2/0 (loss to Hopper and Turing)
5 Galileo 1/4/0 (loss to all but Carver)
6 Carver 0/5/0

Finals: Hopper defeats Roebling in 3 matches

Carver: 1425/16 defeats 1690/2910
Galileo: 1986/1577 defeats 330/4587
Hopper: 254/148 defeats 973/359
Newton: 3310/1678 defeats 1619/118
Roebling: 1323/3476 defeats 179/2383
Turing: 2471/2557 defeats 2122/1538

Seeding:

1 Hopper 4/1/0 (loss to Newton)
2 Turing 4/1/0 (loss to Hopper)
3 Newton 3/2/0 (loss to Turing and Galileo)
4 Roebling 3/2/0 (loss to Hopper and Turing)
5 Galileo 1/4/0 (loss to all but Newton)
6 Carver 0/5/0

Finals: Turing defeats Hopper in 3 matches

I believe that it will be a little different at Houston Champs

Carver 1477/2910 beats 16/1425
Galileo 1986/330 beats 1577/1574
Hopper 148/254 beats 359/973
Newton 3310/1619 beats 118/1678
Roebling 1323/2383 beats 179/3476
Turing 2471/1538 beats 842/987

Einstien

Hopper 4-1-0 (Losses to Galileo)
Turing 3-2-0 (Losses to Hopper and Carver)
Newton 3-2-0 (Losses to Roebling and Turing)
Roebling 2-3-0 (Losses to Turing, Hopper, and Carver)
Carver 2-3-0 (Losses to Hopper, Newton, and Galileo)
Galileo 2-3-0 (Losses to Turing, Newton, and Roebling)

Einstien Finals

Turing beats Hopper in 3 matches

Ooh, looks like fun.

Carver: 16/1690 defeats 1425/1477 in 2
Galileo: 1577/330 defeats 1986/4613 in 3
Hopper: 254/148 defeats 973/359 in 2
Newton: 1678/1619 defeats 118/3310 in 3
Roebling: 1323/179 defeats 3476/1730 in 2
Turing: 2122/1538 defeats 2471/987 in 3

Einstein:
Hopper 4-1
Newton 3-2
Turing 3-2
Roebling 3-2
Galileo 2-3
Carver 1-4

Hopper beats Newton in 2.

First off, hey C4! Glad to see 4505 is well represented on CD. Below all of my predictions, I state my reasoning for picking them. This isn’t meant to offend any teams this is just my opinion for how I see things playing out. Anyways, here are my predictions:

Carver: 1690/16 defeats 1425/1477

  • This field has a few top tier teams that should run the table
  • Orbit makes it back to Einstein for the first time since winning Worlds in 2016, while Bomb Squad makes returns to Einstein for the first time since 2012

Galileo: 1574/1577 defeats 4613/1986

  • Galileo has a couple of solid teams that will fight for top seeding
  • MisCar and Steampunk will go all Turing 2017 (teams from the same district team up to win their division) and make their debut and first appearance since 2010 on Einstein respectively

Hopper: 148/254 defeats 973/3339

  • While Hopper is has a ton of talent, it also has two teams that have been close to unstoppable in it as well
  • The unstoppable alliance of the RoboWranglers and Cheesy Poofs run untouched into Einstein

Newton: 3310/1619 defeats 1678/118

  • This division has a collection of teams that will make the top ten teams a chaotic race to the finish
  • The favorites get upset as Black Hawk tries to go one step further from finalists on Einstein and Up-A-Creek makes their first Einstein appearance

Roebling: 1323/3476 defeats 179/1983

  • A division where the collection of contenders are not as big as others
  • MadTown finally takes the next step and makes it to Einstein after being three straight division finalists while Code Orange continues their recent success at Worlds and makes their third appearance in four years

Turing: 2122/987 defeats 2741/842

  • This division is the hardest to predict as this is probably the most competitive
  • After a crazy playoff (sort of CHS DCMP levels of crazy but not as wild), Tators returns to Einstein for the third straight year while Highrollers extend their streak to four straight

Einstein Seeding:
Hopper: 5/0/0
Newton: 4/1/0
Roebling: 3/2/0
Turing: 2/3/0
Galileo: 1/4/0
Carver: 0/5/0

  • Hopper continues their unstoppable run going undefeated while Newton fights against a neck and neck battle with Roebling and Turing to take the final spot

Finals Prediction:
Newton defeats Hopper in 3

  • Newton shocks Hopper in the first match, Hopper comes back strong in the second, and in the rubber match Newton pulls off the upset
  • Black Hawk wins their first world championship after being so close last year in Detriot while Up-A-Creek wins on their first Einstein appearance

FTFY

Carver: 5026/5499 defeats 5805/100 in 2
Galileo: 649/846 defeats 5817/4201 in 3
Hopper: 294/3970 defeats 980/399 in 2
Newton: 687/968 defeats 5199/5802 in 3
Roebling: 3250/6072 defeats 1072/4159 in 5 (2 consecutive full tie matches)
Turing: 2102/5818 defeats 3512/2658 in 3

Einstein:
Galileo 4-1
Newton 3-2
Carver 3-2
Roebling 3-2
Hopper 2-3
Turing 1-4

Winners, Newton 2-0.

In a bizarre series of events, every division has some major upsets leading into all California alliances onto each division finals and Einstein.

Hey man, WCBC

As a fellow Californian I can support this! Thanks for the shout-out. I heavily suspect Turing Playoffs will be stacked with PNW teams :stuck_out_tongue:

Einstein Alliances

Carver:
16, 2910, 744, 6800

Galileo:
1574, 330, 2659, 3008

Hopper:
254, 148, 1902, 3495

Newton:
1619, 3309, 1868, 812

Roebling:
1323, 179, 1540, 2576

Turing:
842, 2471, 3847, 2231

This just looks like CVR most years, are you sure you’re not predicting CVR 2019 alliances?

Carver: 16/2910 defeats 1425/1690
Galileo: 846/330 defeats 4910/4488
Hopper: 254/148 defeats 399/294
Newton: 1678/3310 defeats 624/118
Roebling: 1323/179 defeats 1983/3250
Turing: 2122/2471 defeats 1538/2046

Seeding:

1 Hopper 4/1/0 (loss to Turing)
2 Newton 4/1/0 (loss to Hopper)
3 Roebling 3/2/0 (loss to Hopper and Newton)
4 Turing 3/2/0 (loss to Newton and Roebling)
5 Carver 1/4/0 (loss to all but Galileo)
6 Galileo 0/5/0

Finals: Newton defeats Hopper

Carver: 16/2910 defeats 1425/1690
Galileo: 1986/330 defeats 1577/1574
Hopper: 254/148 defeats 359/3339
Newton: 1678/118 defeats 3310/624
Roebling: 1323/179 defeats 3476/1983
Turing: 2122/2471 defeats 1538/987

Einstein:

1 Hopper 5-0-0
2 Newton 4-1-0
3 Roebling 3-2-0
4 Turing 2-3-0
5 Galileo 1-4-0
6 Carver 0-5-0

Finals: Hopper defeats Newton in 2 matches

Carver: 5803/4265/5499 beats 16/1690 in 3
Galileo: 3005/846/2789 beats 1577/1574 in 3
Hopper: 254/148 beats 399/294 in 2
Newton: 3310/118 beats 1619/1678 in 2
Roebling: 3250/1983/2383 beats 179/1323 in 3
Turing: 2471/1538 beats 1533/2046 in 3

1 Hopper 4-1-0 (loss to Carver)
2 Carver 3-2-0 (loss to Roebling,Newton)
3 Roebling 3-2-0 (loss to Hopper, Newton)
4 Newton 3-2-0 (loss to Galileo, Hopper)
5 Galileo 1-4-0 (Beat Newton)
6 Turing 1-4-0 (Beat Galileo)

Carver barely edges out Roebling/Newton on park/climb points to make finals, despite losing the head-to-head with both of them.

Finals: Hopper defeats Carver in 2 matches.

(I posted 3 team alliance for a few of the alliances because it’s more fun)

Carver
16-1477 beats 1425-1690 in 3 matches

Galileo
1986-4613 beats 1577-330 in 2 matches

Hopper
254-973 beats 148-359 in 3 matches

Newton
118-3310 beats 1678-1619 in 3 matches

Turing
2471-842 beats 987-1538 in 2 matches

Roebling
179-1323 beats 4188-1072 in 2 matches

Seeding

  1. Hopper (4-1-0) Loss to Turing
  2. Turing (4-1-0) Loss to Newton
  3. Newton (4-1-0) Loss to Hopper
  4. Roebling (2-3-0) Losses to Hopper Turing and Newton
  5. Carver (1-4-0) Win against Galileo
  6. Galileo (0-5-0)

Finals (Hopper vs. Turing)

Finals 1
Hopper wins a very close match which comes down to 2471 just missing their 4 cube scale auto.
Final Score
344-323

Finals 2
Turing shocks Hopper with a dominant performance. 2471 hits the 4 cube auto and holds the scale for a lot of the match.
Final Score
422-339

Finals 3
Turing starts off strong however 254 comes back late in the match by using boost at the perfect time.
Final Score 314-296

Kevin, your unwavering support for us always brings a smile to my face.

Hey man Caleb Sykes says you have a 10% chance of seeding top 8. Those aren’t bad odds :stuck_out_tongue:

So 254 doesn’t finish the finish one of the greatest seasons in First history undefeated, hmm

Great prediction ! I think you won this thread