Improving the Peg -- Help Needed

TLDR; If you access to an Instron and can run a test on the Peg spring, it will help us discover if there is a way to make a more robust spring that behaves literally the same in every way that FIRST teams care about.

Chief Delphi Community,
I am on a quest to see if there is any room to improve the spring on used for the Peg so that it is less prone to being deformed in use while keeping everything that is essential to teams for design purposes (e.g. spring dimensions, spring stiffness rate, initial tension in the coils, …).

It may not be possible… …but after talking with some spring experts (see this thread Looking for Pics of Pristine & Damaged/Broken Peg) there is a reasonable chance that there might well be.

Let me start by saying that I am not FIRST, I am not working with FIRST, I am just a freelancer trying to give FIRST options if they decide they need it.

Okay so here is the deal. There is a reasonably good chance that the spring that is sold by McMaster (9664k68) is not the made from “music wire” (the steel that results in a spring with the highest yield point) but another type of steel.

There are many ways to discover this** but most involve lab tests and take time and equipment FIRST folk don’t have hanging around (typically).

I think that in this case, the fastest way to discover the answer is for someone reading this messaging who also has access to an “Instron” to do a test for me.

Here is the procedure:

  • Take a 9" length of the 9664k68 spring (the length of the peg), bend hooks into each end (snap a picture next to a scale so we can estimate the “active coils” of the spring – not 100% needed but helpful)

  • Install the spring into an Instron.

  • Pull slowly from unloaded to loaded state.

  • Zero the travel when the coils first start to separate (should be ~25lbs)

  • Move to .5". Note force

  • Move back to 0.0" travel. Note force

  • Move to 1.0". Note force

  • Move back to 0.0" travel. Note force

  • Move to 1.5". Note force

  • Move back to 0.0" travel. Note force

  • continue going up by 0.5" increments until the force at the Zero Position has reduced by significant amount (see example data chart below)

A music wire spring should fail to return to the 25lbs* somewhere near 5" of extension. A spring made with steel with a lower yield will fail to return to 25lbs* at after smaller extension.

So… This is not an easy thing to do but it isn’t that hard for a person with the right equipment.

With these data, we can infer what the type of steel that the manufacture of the spring is using to make these springs**.

Once we know that, we can then discover if there is significant room for improvement to make the peg less susceptible to damage (not impervious).

If there is a way to do this without being unfair to the teams that have depended on the “normal” properties of the spring (i.e. those before the spring starts to permanently deform) then maybe it will make sense for FIRST to change to a new, more robust spring design.

Time will tell, but not if a volunteer doesn’t step up and offer to do these tests.

Cheers,
Dr. Joe J.

*or whatever the initial force you get from your batch of springs. Typically these vary 15% from batch to batch.

**Yes, I have a request into McMaster – they are typically quite fast with responses. We will see. But even if I knew the material, I still want the data to see if there is any margin for improvement.

http://imgur.com/a/2Jotv

https://www.mcmaster.com/mvb/library/20160718/9664k680_spring%20stl%20cut-to-length%20extension%20springl.gif





I’m hoping that someone from a technical college sees this. I’ll forward it off to an alum who might be able to connect a local tech college with you.

Dr. Joe, I don’t know how helpful this is, but one of our team’s sponsors is a custom spring manufacturer. They are called AAAA Specialties and are located less than a mile from my home. I could contact them about custom manufacturing a bunch of music wire springs.

I heard a rumor that FIRST is working on a fix for pegs. You know how rumors go - hopefully this one is true!

I mean, the sole purpose of this is to call McMaster or their supplier out on improper material, right? Is there anything from this which would seek to improve the peg? Surely we can engineer a solution without knowing what exact steel is in the spring?

It is.

I don’t believe Joe’s intent is to call out McMaster on anything. There’s nothing “improper” or misrepresented about the spring McMaster is selling. It’s not sold as a music wire spring, it’s sold as “spring-tempered steel”, which it is.

From his previous thread, I think the end goal here would be that *if *the McMaster spring is not music wire, it may be possible to source a spring (possibly custom-made) that is dimensionally and behaviorally the same as the current peg spring but made out of higher quality spring steel, e.g. music wire and therefore more robust.

Ah, ok. Thanks.

I am working with a prototype source that can pretty quickly turn around making 1000 of these springs made from Music Wire. But it won’t be done with money you find in the crevices of your couch ($2K). AND if the spring is already made in a way that gives it close to the properties that a Music Wire then what is the point?

HOWEVER, I have pretty good reason to believe that if you do this test, the spring will “fail” (per my test above) at 2-3" rather than 5-6"

IF that is the case, then there is reason to believe that if we make Pegs from springs are made from Music Wire, the Peg performance would go up significantly.

But the next step is to do this test to see where we stand.

Anyone???

Dr. Joe J.

Proof?

AndyMark is selling a similar spring.
How are they made?

After participating in the Utah Regional last weekend, and following many teams and the fiasco that took place at the Central Valley Regional, I can only hope and pray that the spring issue is resolved by this coming weekend!

No more teams should ever have to suffer with springs that fail to hold a gear that is placed all the way onto the peg, or regionals that only have one peg per alliance. This situation is beyond ridiculous!

A fix for springs would be very appreciated. At Miami Valley, the FTA came on to the mic around qual match 20 to tell teams to be careful. He said something along the lines of “If we keep breaking springs at the same rate we currently are, we’ll be out of springs for elims. Be careful!”

I noticed a big change in spring sag from Week 1 to Week 2 on the same field. I will send Dr. Joe a PM on the FTAs running week two as I discussed a couple tweaks they made and it seemed to have helped a ton with sag without majorly impacting overall flexibility.

I think you could add a dowel or something inside the first half of the spring so it is supported/more rigid, this allows the spring to keep most of its characteristics yet make it more rigid.

I think a piece of rubber hose, rod or even steel cable inserted for the entire length would prolong its life. I think it would make it harder to bend the spring so far that it is damaged.

Why does it have to be a spring? This is a question I’ve had since day 1, why isn’t it just a pipe? That’ll create consistency from peg to peg and event to event.

Wanna ram your robot into the end of a pipe? :eek: :confused:

Plus, it eliminates the chance of a Pilot’s arm getting pulled out of socket. Having people on the field is a pretty big step for FRC, and having any sort of rigid interaction with robots was probably a no-go for them.

At our school we have a Structural Stress Analyzer. It has a max force of 1000lb and a height of 18". Could this be used to test the springs? If so I could try to run a test tomorrow on some used springs we have lying around.

While I had previously heard this was done to prevent damage to the carriage holding the peg, I still cant comprehend why there can’t be something solid (a pipe, etc) OVER the spring from the end opposite the barb extending about 4 inches or so… Obviously it wouldn’t fix all the failure cases, but it addresses a good amount of them.