Linear actuator recommendations

Does anyone have any good recommendations for linear actuators that can extend 18inches in a matter of a second and can hold about 10-20 lbs?

Was literally going to ask the same question! REV makes a good one, but its currently out of stock till supposedly mid-january. Although REV’s isn’t 2 ft extension.

You’re not going to find it COTS–automotive linear actuators are designed for torque rather than speed.

For the load, I’d entertain pneumatics or a COTS elevator kit instead.

3 Likes

At that speed? Pneumatic cylinder, 1/2" bore with a pressure regulator to limit the force should do it.

If you want the calculations let me know.

3 Likes

Fast actuation over long distances is more the province of pneumatics than linear actuators (assuming you only need to move between two positions).

Consider a linear actuator using 1/4-20 threaded rod as the screw. To move it 18", you will need to rotate the screw 18 x 20 times. To do that in one second, you will need to rotate at 18 x 20 x 60 = 21600 rpm.

A NEO 550 has an 11000 rpm no-load speed. A 775 Redline claims to have a 21020 no-load, but of course under any sort of load it’s going to be significantly lower, but you might get up into the 12"/sec range if it’s lightly loaded.

As it happens, I designed a largely 3D-printed linear actuator just to see what could be done cheaply. It gets about 6"/sec with a NEO550 but I also made a variant that accepts a 775 (though I haven’t tested that out).

You can find it (and a lot of other 3D printed FRC mechanisms) here: GitHub - RJWoodhead/FRC3DP

Here’s a clip of the device being powered by a NEO 550 (unloaded): https://www.youtube.com/shorts/NUQg79O8sjk

It’s a quick print and build so you might give it a shot.

1 Like

Rereading your post, I missed part of your requirements.

You might also look into the StrongArm build in the same repo. That will definitely handle the load and speed, but it’s a bit of a beefy boi.

How about climber on 2020everybot?

1 Like

If pneumatics are not an option (although I agree with posters above on them being a great option for this use case and probably the cheapest) how about:

This topic was automatically closed 365 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.