Not to Be a Total Stick in the Mud

I like it!!

That seems like a remarkably small space to fit a robot, worktable, storage, battery station, driver console, and chairman’s displays/materials in. Could you elaborate on exactly how you guys fit so much into that space and help the rest of us out?

In response to “why are there so many kids in the pits” question, I can say from personal experience that the pits are the best place to be at competition. They are the place to be if you want to help fix the robot, learn more about the team, and generally benefit from the competition experience.

But I don’t need to tell commenters about that. If you are a part of FRC, you understand that. What I would like to remind posters about is how demeaning being thrown out of the pits is.

You have worked for six weeks, putting your team above friends, social engagements and sometimes even school to build the robot that now lies broken before you. Now, an older and supposedly wiser member of the team yells at you to leave. Your commitment doesn’t matter, or the fact that you could actually help. Only the fact that you are a Freshman and look like you getting in the way.

I know that there are safety issues, and that order in the pits must be maintained. I hope you realize that just because you are an indispensable member of the pit crew does not mean that everyone else should just go away.

This is very true which is why I don’t demand that any team member never be in the pit it’s just that they shouldn’t stay there for very long. Competition is far more than just working on the robot and in fact I hope my students know that they can work on the robot all they want when we are home in the shop but they get limited chances to meet other like minded people and to watch the robots actually compete. They also have many other ways that they can contribute to the team, and learn about engineering besides for working on our robot.

You can actually work with your team in visiting the pits.

  • Go in very small groups, taking turns with time limits. Then return to the stands or the meeting place. There are jobs like Scouting and Spirit that need attention. There are also jobs like helping with lunches and team errands.
  • Have 2 people in charge of distributing giveaways go through the pits. That job can be swapped off with 2 more people, and so on.
  • Tell the parents and guests of the team not to crowd around the pit and block the path of the robots, the Ambassadors, the Judges, and the FIRST folks.
  • Each team can lend a hand with keeping the pits friendly, fun, and manageable by having a team plan and implementing it. No team needs to set up a party shop in the pits.

Jane

https://photos-1.dropbox.com/i/xl/3nWdQ5UszW1LhAv35CXICIQ9SyB03_9iEbwjtHDxtUk/9194520/1331103600/8ae9a79/

This was version #1 from last season. Version #2 this year is much more efficient.

It’s broken:(

I understand the allure of working in your team’s pit. But I try to impress on all my students that we’re here for and as a team, and we each have our own jobs. No matter how much you enjoy it or how much you’ve put in, hanging around the pit talking slows work on our robot down, impedes neighboring teams, and restricts traffic for everyone. It’s also a drastically inappropriate use of your time if you’re not the best person(s) for that job.

We’re happy to rotate people, call students from the stands, and have observers if they’re not impeding teams and/or volunteers. In the mean time, there’s other work to be done. Before I spent so much time in our pit, I earned my place by visiting other teams, introducing ourselves, helping them and looking for solutions to our problems. Even now as the adult manager, I spend a lot of time with my alliance partners, scouters, and other teams. There’s plenty of competition experience to be had everywhere.

With no offense towards anyone in particular, I have little patience for any attitude of “I deserve to be here” because I earned it or even because I know best. Part of inspiring students to STEM and other professional careers is teaching them to work on a team and appreciate the value of every position on it. Understand that if we’re asking you to leave it’s because you’re impeding the performance or ourselves or others and because your time, for the current moment, could be better spend elsewhere.

Your dropbox hates hotlinking. I’ll attach your picture to this post for clarity.

If that’s representative of your claim that you only use 29% of your pit for storage and robot, then I’m skeptical. If that’s a 10’ x 10’ pit and those square on the corners are 18" squares, then it sure looks like you’re already using nearly 30% of your pit space without a robot in there. And a robot with bumpers is going to take up about 10% of your pit space as it is. Basically, I’m skeptical of your claim that you can have 13-16 people fully contained in your pit and working productively on a robot.





Perhaps he’s talking about using 29% of the volume of the pit, not the floor area. Perhaps also the 13 students are stacked vertically in pairs to use the full 10’ height.

I’d like to suggest “Robot Escort” - kind of like a police escort.

  • Mr. Van
    Coach, Robodox

Hmm, a new role for Robodox?

It is impossible. Assume that the average person takes up 1 square foot of space that leaves 5 square feet of non-human existence and you can barely fit a robot much less tools, the table, and have room to work (because 1 square foot is just standing room not moving around and actually working).

What I really can’t stand is when people put so much in their pit for display, storage, and “cool factor” that the team members have to stand outside of their pit to work or have the robot sticking out the front.

There is no reason why a team would need more than 7 people in their pit. (4 drive team and 3 pit crew). If you trained your members properly there would be no need to have a judging reps because you pit and drive team should know your team inside and out.

If teams stayed on top of how many people they had in their pit area and the spill out effect that happens into the aisle. The pits would be a much safer, happier, quieter, and nice place to be for guests and sponsors.

We have over 50 students on the team. The pit crew is just a few students with experts for components bought in when needed to work on problems. At Seattle last year the students came with a new pit crew member. The position is host/bouncer. He was host to any guests that came and a bouncer to keep our own team from filling the pit or aisles around our pit. By answering the questions that people had he allowed the pit crew to work undisturbed. The mentors stay out of the pit unless invited.

Shortened for simplicity.

Coming from a vet like you KoKo, I completely agree. The goal of creating a competition based around science, learning and technology rivaling a sporting event brings with it some of the normal dramas and creates its own.

2 & 3 are the same old thing you get at any event. Falls on volunteers to be diligent but given the sheer masses sometimes, you’re bailing water out of the titanic with a thimble. #4 is one of those things it’s everyone’s job to use common sense. #5 is one I still shake my head at. Even FTC level teams use carts and you can carry those bots one handed. As for #1, I guess that one is a failure of people to read event site rules.

I’ll add to the list though voo voo zella horns :yikes: and over the top horns. Those things I’ll happily stick in the mud.

Yes, vehemently. There is never a need to yell anything.

That’s more like it.

Teams should learn from this.

Seconded. Do we get to vote on it now?

Oh, I am so glad you mentioned this. Last year I was talking to judges about 60% of the time I was in the pits, and teams would plow through screaming ROBOT with no regard for what they were interrupting. This meant that I had to repeat things and get uncomfortably close to the judges just to explain parts of our robot. This is especially difficult for teams like Gatorzillas, who have a pit that’s not conducive to quickly shuffling judges in as a robot comes plowing through.

As others have said, our policy is to send whichever driver is holding the OI ahead of everyone else to politely clear the way, with the other driver pulling the robot behind. Admittedly, when I took point, I’d mix it up by throwing in sarcasm, but I wouldn’t advise that particular method, especially around anyone on a Segway.

From one BEST/FIRST vet to the rest of you, what things that are common place in BEST competitions would you rather not see at a FIRST regional? I think it would be good to compile a specific list.

This may not be the thread to do this in. It might be good to start a separate thread.

I will add a couple of thoughts here:

  1. Many teams treat the FRC pits like they treat the Display halls - using those for social gatherings. In LASA, we treat both competitions the same:
  • enjoy the competition/check out the Displays and Pits but you have jobs to do and don’t shirk those
  • don’t cluster, gather, block, bottleneck
    because
  • you each have jobs to do
  • don’t hang around the Pit or Display
    because
  • you are interferring with the work that needs to be done
    • for Display purposes, the presenters that maintain the Display are there to talk about the team and the community involvement to visitors, guests, VIPS, Judges, and the teams. They are not there as a magnet for their fellow team members.
    • for the Pit purposes, the pit crew is busy maintaining the robot, the Pit, and making themselves available to talk with visitors, guests, VIPS, Judges, and other teams. They are not there as a magnet for their fellow team members.

Because of the nature of the Displays and their purpose, I think some of the FRC/BEST teams fail to completely grasp the importance of the purpose of the Pits and they overwhelm them with social clusters and bottlenecks.

  1. This is a different discussion but it is an important one. BEST is student centric. FRC isn’t. The programs both support and encourage STEM initiatives but their programs are very different. It takes a lot of time and effort to help new team members and parents understand and grasp the value of those differences each year. Some teams do that well. Some teams don’t. The teams that grasp the value of the differences and work towards setting the bar of excellence in each - are the ones that we see garnering awards and recognition in FIRST and BEST and the other robotics programs as well.

One thing that I love about BEST is their approach to the Pits. They are not open to everyone. They are only available to those who have pit passes and to BEST folks which include Judges and invited VIPs. I like that and think FRC could benefit from something similar with designated times for the Pits to be open to the everyone.

One of the things that I despise about the BEST competitions at Regional level are the bands that are allowed in the stands to support the teams. Not all teams can afford to fund their bands or their cheerleaders travel and they can seriously impact the Spirit Award and other awards, in my opinion. The noise level is dangerous and ridiculous. It totally overwhelms to the work of the DJ who, 9 times out of 10, blasts the speakers to distortion to try to overpower the bands. It’s insane.

In Texas, I think a lot of this has to do with how young and inexperienced so many of the FRC teams are. We should see huge strides in development in our regions in the next 3 to 4 years. That is the hope.

Jane

Also, the 2013 FRC game will be to see who can stack the most amount of freshmen in their pit. Stack Attack II?

I think one of the most inspiring things about FRC competitions is seeing teams working on their robots. Removing that from the public’s view would be detrimental to the program. Some outside observers don’t always believe that the students are building these robots. FIRST does a very good job of keeping spectators safe and just the safety glasses requirement alone keeps some people out of the pit.

Teams are able to take their own view on how welcoming they want their pit. For example at Alamo team 4000 (a rookie team) had a pit that included cut outs for people to take photos with, they obviously didn’t mind having people come by their pit. On the other hand (this is just my take) team 245’s pit was less welcoming which is not a bad thing. Their students were diligently working most of the time and I don’t think many spectators would have interrupted them. How you construct your pit and how you interact with it and manage it determines a lot.