The total cost for each cable we made was less than $10.00
vs
Nice!
We are currently using 97527A005, the king of all lockwashers, but after seeing how clean this solution is, I’m also interested in trying some of these Nordlocks.
What crimper are you using? Is it really pneumatic? We’ve been using the Harbor Freight cheapo hydraulic crimper and it’s just fine.
It gets more pronounced if your robots have higher current draws, longer wire runs, or crappier crimps–but there’s your baseline. I’d be inclined to tackle other places first (especially upping drive motors from 12 AWG to 10 AWG, which has a higher percentage effect, and shortening runs there), but if you’re sweating every bit of your battery voltage that’s one to do as well.
Yeah, I don’t know if I have more electrical knowledge than you, but it looks to me like if your robot is wired with 36 inches of red and black 4awg, and you’re drawing 240 A, it would give you access to an additional tenth of a volt at your PDP.
[240 A * (.3951-.2485 ohm) * 36 in]/(1000 ft) = .1 V
I think the reduction of waste heat is a more significant improvement.
0.1056 Volt x 240 Ampere = 25.3 Watt.
With 6 AWG, that extra wasted power is heating the cables, and that heat is flowing from the cables to their contacts; cycles of that heating, with cool-off periods between, accelerate loosening of those contacts. When contacts get too loose, they will exhibit momentary high resistance during mechanical shocks, causing brown-out. Because the contacts are hidden under insulation (tape, heat shrink, or connector housings) they don’t get inspected and their failure comes as a surprise.
With 4 AWG, that 25.3 Watt goes to the PDP as usable electric power, putting less cyclic thermal stress on contacts and allowing the robot’s electrical system to do more.
We did not cut any strands and the students took their time using the correct stripping tool (http://a.co/1c9esHm) for this gauge of wire and then carefully slid the wires into the 6awg connectors.
More on the washer setup in a minute…
The crimper is not pneumatic… I’ll pretend it’s an allusion to the hydraulic arm video from FIRST and not a mistake though.
Advantage? No… but we are using them the way Nord-lock recommends.
I have no idea why you think they don’t match. See above info about lug sizing. Also, price with new SB50s doesn’t break the bank and since you don’t believe me, you can do some math:
SB50: $1.24
1 ft Red cable: $1.00
1 ft Black cable: $1.00
PP75/SB50 Loose Piece Contact (Gauge: 6): $0.58
PP75/SB50 Loose Piece Contact (Gauge: 6): $0.58
THOMAS & BETTS 54906BE 4 AWG LONG BARREL 1/4 " SINGLE HOLE - BLIND END: $0.80
THOMAS & BETTS 54906BE 4 AWG LONG BARREL 1/4 " SINGLE HOLE - BLIND END: $0.80
I’m not trying to start a war. I think they don’t match because I just ordered one of these for our new battery analyzer (https://powerwerx.com/anderson-sb-connectors-sb50-50amp) and it doesn’t match any of the FRC connectors on our batteries without significant modification!
Also, my question was for where you sourced the SB50 with 4 gauge lugs. Your paper does not state that you are using 6 gauge lugs. That makes a difference, look at the 4 gauge options and the price climbs.
While, I know this is a safe practice; with some of the inspectors I have ran into the last two years, justifying jamming a 4 gauge wire into a 6 gauge lug, is a battle I’m not willing to take on right now.
Interesting… I’ve only used them on studs in industrial applications, but after seeing your post and thinking about the locking mechanism it makes since to need them on both sides of a bolted connection.
Did you get a red SB-50 connector from them? The only colors that mate with red are red and pink, the latter presumably a custom run for FRC so Anderson’s donated housings are obvious.
We have decided to make the plunge this year. We have purchased 2 awg wire. SB120’s and a hydraulic crimper. Now I’m going to purchase those washers.