Thread created automatically to discuss a document in CD-Media.
FRC Seeding World Rankings! by: samir13k
Shows how your robot seeds against the rest of the world! (Excel Spreadsheet)
This is a spreadsheet taking the seedings from all regionals. putting them together, and then ranking them. Since all regionals did not play the same amount of matches, I have divided the Overall Seeding points for the team, and divided it by the amount of matches they played. IF YOUR TEAM HAS PLAYED MORE THAN 1 REGIONAL, YOU WILL BE LISTED TWICE SEPERATELY. Hope You enjoy it. It is in no way official, or guaranteed to be 100% accurate, but it is cool to see if your team did really well. Sorry, but the Wisconsin regional is the only unlisted regional. Feel free to make any mods to your own copy, I may or may not update it depending on how many people would like to see it. Thanks
note this is ranked by average score per match played, there is a column to the right of that, which is the average score per match played WITHOUT COOPERTITION Bonus. It doesnt change the ranks too much, but its cool to see what you would have if the coopertition bonus was not in effect.
This looks really cool! I have to comment though, most (if not all) of that is a reflection of how that alliance did, and not the specific team. I noticed that when I saw that there were a few teams (specifically mine) with hanging points… despite their lack of hanging mechanism!
clarification= This was never meant for scouting… just for a sort of overall view of how a team did… I do have a column for scores without coopertition… I could make one for without hanging too, but that would be unfair to teams that do have hanging mechanisms… I dont have the drive to figure out whether or not these 1117 teams have hanging mechanisms or not :ahh: lol
The data for Midwest is incomplete. The FIRST website is missing a partial round of matches. All teams played 10 matches and in the end, 1732 ended up first and 16 was second (I’m sure there were other such rankings changes in other places.
The rankings for WPI are incorrect: because of a mistake in the data entry (Edit: Not your data, the data entry at the competition which actually caused a re-do of the alliance selection), the data you have is missing the final qualification match, which impacted the top 8 rankings.