Post-Championships Performance Analysis and Awards

FIRST General Forum
1

Similar to this thread I posted before Championships had begun, I’m making a followup post including data from Champs.

Please note that some of these may be tied with other matches, in which case only one of the matches is reported here so the post isn’t too long.

Highest Score
Pre-Champs
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 4 Match 2
Red: 230 1519 176 – 257
Blue: 1058 319 3467 – 178

Pre-Champs + Champs
Carver Division
Quarter Finals 3 Match 2
Red: 120 2481 330 – 275
Blue: 3478 360 57 – 155

Champs Only
Carver Division
Quarter Finals 3 Match 2
Red: 120 2481 330 – 275
Blue: 3478 360 57 – 155

Highest Score (Minus Penalty Bonus):
Pre-Champs
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 4 Match 2
Red: 230 1519 176 – 252
Blue: 1058 319 3467 – 173

Pre-Champs + Champs
Hopper Division
Quarter Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 364 148 1678 – 270
Blue: 70 4920 231 – 130

Champs Only
Hopper Division
Quarter Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 364 148 1678 – 270
Blue: 70 4920 231 – 130

Highest Penalty:
Pre-Champs
Michigan State Championship
Qualifications Match 130
Red: 3688 74 66 – 0
Blue: 5048 2611 5155 – 55

Pre-Champs + Champs
Michigan State Championship
Qualifications Match 130
Red: 3688 74 66 – 0
Blue: 5048 2611 5155 – 55

Champs Only
Tesla Division
Qualifications Match 74
Red: 2054 3238 6171 – 0
Blue: 540 1622 5677 – 45

Highest Teleoperated Score:
Pre-Champs
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 4 Match 2
Red: 230 1519 176 – 202
Blue: 1058 319 3467 – 153

Pre-Champs + Champs
Hopper Division
Quarter Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 364 148 1678 – 210
Blue: 70 4920 231 – 100

Champs Only
Hopper Division
Quarter Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 364 148 1678 – 210
Blue: 70 4920 231 – 100

Highest Autonomous Score:
Pre-Champs
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 3 Match 1
Red: 195 125 2168 – 70
Blue: 558 1124 5846 – 32

Pre-Champs + Champs
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 3 Match 1
Red: 195 125 2168 – 70
Blue: 558 1124 5846 – 32

Champs Only
Einstein Field
Quarter Finals 2 Match 2
Red: 195 1197 987 – 70
Blue: 2052 2122 3538 – 42

Highest Winning Margin:
Pre-Champs
Hub City Regional
Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 4063 3310 4301 – 156
Blue: 5572 5437 3366 – 0
Winning Margin: 156.0

Pre-Champs + Champs
Archimedes Division
Semi Finals 1 Match 1
Red: 5050 1986 1501 – 200
Blue: 4039 2064 2338 – 0
Winning Margin: 200.0

Champs Only
Archimedes Division
Semi Finals 1 Match 1
Red: 5050 1986 1501 – 200
Blue: 4039 2064 2338 – 0
Winning Margin: 200.0

Highest Winning Margin (non-zero score):
Pre-Champs
Windsor Essex Great Lakes Regional
Quarter Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 2056 910 4920 – 205
Blue: 1075 6110 1334 – 58
Winning Margin: 147.0

Pre-Champs + Champs
Newton Division
Semi Finals 1 Match 1
Red: 254 1241 708 – 242
Blue: 3937 179 3620 – 70
Winning Margin: 172.0

Champs Only
Newton Division
Semi Finals 1 Match 1
Red: 254 1241 708 – 242
Blue: 3937 179 3620 – 70
Winning Margin: 172.0

Highest High Goal Count:
Pre-Champs
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 4 Match 2
Red: 230 1519 176 – 21
Blue: 1058 319 3467 – 9

Pre-Champs + Champs
Hopper Division
Quarter Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 364 148 1678 – 24
Blue: 70 4920 231 – 9

Champs Only
Hopper Division
Quarter Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 364 148 1678 – 24
Blue: 70 4920 231 – 9

Highest Autonomous High Goal Count:
Pre-Champs
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 3 Match 1
Red: 195 125 2168 – 4
Blue: 558 1124 5846 – 1

Pre-Champs + Champs
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 3 Match 1
Red: 195 125 2168 – 4
Blue: 558 1124 5846 – 1

Champs Only
Einstein Field
Quarter Finals 2 Match 2
Red: 195 1197 987 – 4
Blue: 2052 2122 3538 – 2

Highest Teleop High Goal Count:
Pre-Champs
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 4 Match 2
Red: 230 1519 176 – 19
Blue: 1058 319 3467 – 9

Pre-Champs + Champs
Tesla Division
Qualifications Match 102
Red: 1690 1806 2834 – 22
Blue: 548 5439 66 – 6

Champs Only
Tesla Division
Qualifications Match 102
Red: 1690 1806 2834 – 22
Blue: 548 5439 66 – 6

Highest Low Goal Count:
Pre-Champs
FIRST Chesapeake District Championship
Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 836 1418 5804 – 16
Blue: 1137 422 1262 – 11

Pre-Champs + Champs
FIRST Chesapeake District Championship sponsored by Booz Allen Hamilton
Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 836 1418 5804 – 16
Blue: 1137 422 1262 – 11

Champs Only
Curie Division
Qualifications Match 75
Red: 4010 3546 639 – 16
Blue: 379 3230 191 – 2

Highest Autonomous Low Goal Count:
Pre-Champs
South Florida Regional
Finals 1 Match 3
Red: 179 2590 5472 – 0
Blue: 180 1065 3932 – 2

Pre-Champs + Champs
South Florida Regional
Finals 1 Match 3
Red: 179 2590 5472 – 0
Blue: 180 1065 3932 – 2

Champs Only
Curie Division
Qualifications Match 24
Red: 4329 1389 166 – 1
Blue: 3546 836 5279 – 2

Highest Teleop Low Goal Count:
Pre-Champs
MAR District - Bridgewater-Raritan Event
Quarter Finals 3 Match 1
Red: 869 834 224 – 2
Blue: 5624 1676 223 – 16
Pre-Champs + Champs
MAR District - Bridgewater-Raritan Event
Quarter Finals 3 Match 1
Red: 869 834 224 – 2
Blue: 5624 1676 223 – 16

Champs Only
Carver Division
Qualifications Match 81
Red: 4301 3735 120 – 2
Blue: 57 1746 1481 – 15

Highest Total (Low + High) Goal Count:
Pre-Champs
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 4 Match 2
Red: 230 1519 176 – 1 Low + 21 High
Blue: 1058 319 3467 – 4 Low + 9 High

Pre-Champs + Champs
Hopper Division
Quarter Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 364 148 1678 – 0 Low + 24 High
Blue: 70 4920 231 – 0 Low + 9 High

Champs Only
Hopper Division
Quarter Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 364 148 1678 – 0 Low + 24 High
Blue: 70 4920 231 – 0 Low + 9 High

If you want to see the stats for yourself, you can do so here

2

Wow. Thanks for the awesome summary of some of the greatest achievements! I’m happy to see that MAR maintained the highest low goal count :smiley: Also 24 high goals by 148’s alliance is CRAZY! No video of that one up yet… It’s also interesting to note that 6 of the 14 categories were not beat by a championship event match.

3

In case you missed it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhs-Ly84S9E&list=PLPUJJPXRAlETMOz23-uvGwP0QPyEFMd9D&index=81. Huge props to 5624 and 223 for each putting in 10 and 6 low goals respectively in this match.

4

I am patiently waiting for the 270 score match to be posted on YouTube. That was a super fun match to watch and 1678/148’s strategy was great. We would take balls from the secret passage and dump them in the courtyard, giving them quick access. With their accuracy, they were able to score 21 high goals in teleop. We didn’t even get our triple hang that match :ahh:

5

Does this count for either highest or highest minus penalty, since the penalty was not gameplay related…

6

The high score only looks at the total score. Adjustments are taken into account when calculating the total score as given by TBA’s API. Penalties are subtracted from the total score in the Highest Score without Penalties category, but since red cards are counted in the ‘adjustments’ category, it is seen as a zero-scoring match.

7

Here’s a link to a video that I took of our 270-point match on Hopper. I apologize for the shameless coverage of our robot but I wasn’t initially planning on recording the whole match, just our two ball auto.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPdCfKm_mys

8

Thank you for this - it was a truly insane match. 148 did a great job of grabbing boulders from the opponent’s secret passage, and I think that was our best match feeding-wise. You guys were just absolutely on point with your scoring and I think the feeder - “360 no-scope” strategy was a great one for our alliance.

9

Wow. I counted the 24 high goals:

1 auton + 12 teleop for 148
2 auton + 9 teleop for 1678

Neither of the shooters missed at all.

Message: you’d better defend against these guys or they’ll shoot your lights out.

Are you going to IRI?

10

We do not plan on attending IRI.

11

I was so extremely confused when you guys abandoned that strategy for Einstein. It seemed like you would have smashed the competition of you had kept that up.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

12

Hopefully they invite defensive robots to IRI :smiley:

13

You know, it could’ve been possible to use that strategy during semis against the Carver alliance. They managed to enact that in play it seems for semis 1, but some untimely misses by 148 nullified that.

What would’ve worked, I believe, was 2990 ejecting the balls into Carver’s SP. Yes, they would be giving the boulders away to Carver, but they also will end up canceling out the bowling advantage the HPs have. Carver couldn’t cycle quick enough to protect the balls, and leaving a crowd of boulders there would leave 148 open to constantly scoring and scoring. If 1678 and 148 time their shots correctly, the HPs on the Carver alliance would essentially be starving themselves.

14

So proud our team got on this list! We had an incredible match, and were with other great low goal shooters as well. Go Red!

15

At MSC how did blue alliance pull 55pts of penalty, it all seemed good minus the CDF propped up, but thats not 55 pts worth. I expected 1 bot to be flipped, another on fire and a fist fight while crossing over the outerworks after the match was over for 55pts of penalty. Could somebody explain?

16

With you there :smiley:

17

With 55 seconds remaining in the match, a blue robot pushed a boulder under the CDF preventing the red alliance from crossing it. G12-1. The situation was never corrected so the fouls piled up, one every five seconds. You can see the head ref waving his flag each time. MSC Q130.

18

That’s a tough one to take. The boulder rolled under there when the sally port door pushed it. No robot ever touched it, and I don’t see how you could call that deliberate.

19

I think it was inadvertent since it looked like the robot was trying (but failed) to pick the ball up after it was stuck under the CDF.

20

I don’t think the blue robot, that appears to touch the stuck ball at 1:35 in the video, was deliberately trying to jam it under the CDF. But I can understand how the referees might have seen it that way, and they certainly had the best view. In any case I agree it is a tough call to take.