If you guys looked closely there was a scholarship for animators, I got lucky because it is probably the college I’m going to. It is called the College for Creative Studies, and it’s a $@#$@#$@#$@# good animation school, as well as an art school. But I agree, if FIRST wants to convince me that FIRST is more then just robots, they need to work a little bit harder to give recognition to animations and websites.
With that, Ideas for next year.
Hopefully Autodesk reads this, it would make a huge difference.
It’s obvious that many of us are upset over the winning animation, there were several that believed that wasn’t the best one. And we need more student input on the judging. SO here’s what could work.
1st, recalculate the scoring. I think more emphasis needs to be put on technical execution. If I could do the scoring it would be 30 for techincal, 30 for content, and 30 for creativity. The remaining 10 would be from the highest finish in you conference. If you won a regional animation you got 10. Second, you got 6. Third you got 3. That actually puts some emphasis on the regional animation, and really takes into account student point of views on animation. For example, 967 would have been 10 points down in that category, because I believe that they never got 1st, 2nd, or 3rd. But My team would have had 10 points, because we did win a few regioanl animation awards.
I believe that this way would be able to be the only way to actually get animators input on the winner. Technical execution definantly needs to come up because it’s worth nothing right now. Teams that display awesome skill need to be rewarded, because the winning teams all have good content and good creativity, So it should come down to how seemless it is.
I’m graduating, so this really doesn’t apply to me anymore, but I still believe that I want to help you guys out as best I can.
Let me know what you guys think on this process.