Pre-Championships Performance Awards

FIRST General Forum
1

With all the pre-championships events being done and dusted, it’s time for some analysis of the results. If there was an award for each of the following categories, the following alliances would get them:

Highest Score:
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 4 Match 2
Red: 230 1519 176 – 257
Blue: 1058 319 3467 – 178

Highest Score (Minus Penalty Bonus):
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 4 Match 2
Red: 230 1519 176 – 252
Blue: 1058 319 3467 – 173

Highest Penalty:
Michigan State Championship
Qualifications Match 130
Red: 3688 74 66 – 0
Blue: 5048 2611 5155 – 55

Highest Teleoperated Score:
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 4 Match 2
Red: 230 1519 176 – 202
Blue: 1058 319 3467 – 153

Highest Autonomous Score:
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 3 Match 1
Red: 195 125 2168 – 70
Blue: 558 1124 5846 – 32

Highest Winning Margin:
Hub City Regional
Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 4063 3310 4301 – 156
Blue: 5572 5437 3366 – 0
Winning Margin: 156.0

Highest Winning Margin (only matches without a red card):
Windsor Essex Great Lakes Regional
Quarter Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 2056 910 4920 – 205
Blue: 1075 6110 1334 – 58
Winning Margin: 147.0

Highest High Goal Count:
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 4 Match 2
Red: 230 1519 176 – 21
Blue: 1058 319 3467 – 9

Highest Autonomous High Goal Count:
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 3 Match 1
Red: 195 125 2168 – 4
Blue: 558 1124 5846 – 1

Highest Teleop High Goal Count:
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 4 Match 2
Red: 230 1519 176 – 19
Blue: 1058 319 3467 – 9

Highest Low Goal Count:
Chesapeake District Championship
Finals 1 Match 2
Red: 836 1418 5804 – 16
Blue: 1137 422 1262 – 11

Highest Autonomous Low Goal Count:
South Florida Regional
Finals 1 Match 3
Red: 179 2590 5472 – 0
Blue: 180 1065 3932 – 2

Highest Teleop Low Goal Count:
MAR District - Bridgewater-Raritan Event
Quarter Finals 3 Match 1
Red: 869 834 224 – 2
Blue: 5624 1676 223 – 16

Highest Total (Low + High) Goal Count:
New England District Championship
Quarter Finals 4 Match 2
Red: 230 1519 176 – 1 Low + 21 High
Blue: 1058 319 3467 – 4 Low + 9 High

If you want to see the stats for yourself, you can do so here

2

And…
…this is why the District model is so effective.
The ability to iterate your design and improve its performance throughout a season at competitions is invaluable.
All for the cost of 2 Regionals if you go to a District CMP.

Witness 195’s genesis from a High Goal cycler to their 2-ball autonomous with a scaler. Other teams have had the opportunity to practice & improve their High Goal capability and scalers as well.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out at the CMP in 11 days.

Big thanks to FiM for getting this boulder rolling.
There is good reason that FIRST will be holding one of the dual championships in Detroit in 2 years.

3

I agree. The district model definitely gives teams more playing time for less money. It also provides for a lot more time to get to know other teams in your district which breeds respect and camaraderie among the teams as well as great opportunities to create synergy in the match strategies.

We were lucky to get to know Mechanical Mayhem well when we worked with them in 2015 at the UMASS-Dartmouth district event… and we were really happy to see them again at the Pinetree district event this year… and even happier to get to work with them at the NE DCMP this weekend. We were also thrilled when we both received acknowledgement as District Chairman’s Award teams. :smiley: They are a great team both on an off the field.

I also want to give a shout out to the young student who had stopped by our pit with his dad/mentor to check out our carbon fiber catapult and pickup mechanism. He casually mentioned before they walked away that he wanted to let us know that he had noticed that there was a crack in 2 brackets that were holding up the front end of our bumper frame. :o His observation allowed us to swap out the damaged brackets for the stronger replacements we had brought with us during down time between our matches instead of having to deal with them when they broke during a match (possibly waiting until eliminations). Unfortunately I don’t know what team they were with (they had jackets on) but maybe he participates on CD and will see this post. (If you know who this might be please let us know). I wanted to thank him for his gracious professionalism in giving us that heads up. He truly gets what FIRST is about.

4

thanks for putting this together !

How did Championship statistics compare to Pre-Championship ?

5

You can see for yourself here!

6