There was some discussion over on the “candidly speaking” thread about the rate of rookie teams failing, I started to respond there, but this is a separate topic. Part of the first and second year attrition is surely due to a lack of a go to local resource for those teams.
Everyone who posts regularly on these forums could, with just a few emails be the difference between a new team succeeding and a team becoming a statistic next year. We know where the potholes are, we could help the rookies avoid them.
Yes, there are senior mentors who could do this, but the teams have to seek them out, I’m thinking in the other direction. That we as existing mentors or team members reach out to the new teams and offer help and guidance. Essentially I’m suggesting that people who want to improve FRC adopt a rookie team. Not become a mentor mind you, but a resource they can contact.
But I hear you say, “I’m not sure where the closest rookie is, how can I offer help if I don’t know?”
That report lists all of the rookie teams for 2018 as of this morning 12/12/17 page 1 is a list view filterable by country and state/province page 2 is a map view also filterable by country or state/province code.
I’m currently working with 6819, have been since August, I’ve had an email exchange with 7311, and just followed up with them again. The map reminded me of 7041 which is very close to me and I will seek them out, contact their lead mentor and offer assistance to them as well.
You may ask, what would FIRST say? I might send a link to this thread to Frank, but none of us need permission from FIRST to offer help, we just need to step up and offer it. If FIRST wanted to codify this in some way I’d be happy to see it, but I know they’re much too busy right now to be messing with something like this and the time to make contact and offer help to these rookies is now, before kickoff.
Actually, the time to do this was prior to event registration, but like they say; the best time to plant a tree is two decades ago, the second best time is today.