Posted by Andy Baker.
Engineer on team #45, TechnoKats, from Kokomo High School and Delphi Automotive Systems.
Posted on 11/7/99 11:28 PM MST
In Reply to: Re: Selection of students to attend competitions posted by Jason Morrella on 11/7/99 10:10 PM MST:
During the past two years, we have had two main criteria for allowing student travel.
- Grades
- Point System (based on involvement)
Our ‘student contract’ signifies that if a student doesn’t have a ‘C’ average or better, then they cannot travel.
Also, we have had this point system. Students would get 10 points per meeting in the fall (plus some for events), and points in Jan. & Feb. for hours they were productive. In order for thier time to be recorded, a coach had to sign for them. We had a minium point level that had to be reached before they were approved to travel. Our point level was 300 points, while we had some students who had over 1200.
This point system was difficult to keep, needless to say. Jeff Burch did a great job with it, but we are going to try something new this year.
We still are going to have the grade requirements, but we will treat each student case by case. With the student’s input, we decided on a new system.
This system includes three things: a task sheet, a journal (optional) and two meetings.
The task sheet is a tool that a student can use that is sorta like the badges boy scouts get for completing tasks. If they get trained on a band saw, they complete the task. If they make a presentation, then they complete the task. If they design a sub-assemlby… you get the idea. We’ll have many tasks to complete.
Any student who will not be spending as much time with the team as others (like if they have a part time job, of if they’re on a sports team), then they need to keep a journal of thier efforts. This journal comes in handy during the two ‘meetings’.
The ‘meetings’ consist of a leadership group (coaches and 1 or 2 student reps). These will take place during the end of Jan. and the end of Feb. Students who have made ‘questionable’ efforts will be reviewed during this meeting, and then given a chance to step-up their efforts. By the time the next meeting in Feb. comes up, then either the student has improved, or they haven’t. This improvement is measured by their completing their ‘tasks’ and how much they have done, which should be recorded in their ‘journals’.
We’ll see how it goes. This change is reflective with our team getting older and our students maturing. Also, this gives them some more responsibility.
I’ll stop rambling.
Andy B.