I see only two ways to generate vacuum legally:
Use a cylinder to create a vacuum in the air tube and suction cup by driving the cylinder with another actuator (motor, etc.).
Use the suction cup itself. If you would use a bellows-style cup, you can press it down, seal it, and then pull up on the cup a bit and there would be a vacuum in the cup.
Neither of these uses would not give you very good vacuum, but vacuum none the less.
Andy B.
I just read the part in the manual that states you can only use a cylinder to create a vacuum. Opps I guess that’s what I get for being a slow reader.
My team also has had some trouble with the idea of suction cups. I belive you must use some kind of device to flatten the cup and the peel it up later. 
As stated above all you would have to do is take an air cylinder and don’t hook it up to the air. use one of the port and hook it to your suction cup and pull or push the shaft and it will create a vacuum on the port.
*Originally posted by jrgrim12 *
**Doesn’t accelerating air over a hole creat a vacuum. That’s how air planes fly. They accelerate air over the top of the wing which lowers the air pressure and creates lift. **
Very little of a plane’s lift comes from this, almost all of it comes from the angle of attack. Stick your hand out the window of your car, directly into the wind. Curve it, notice any difference? Now angle it up. 
The only way I can think of to leagally create suction (good suction) is to use pnumatics to move a plunger inside a tube. If done right you shouldn’t lose any pressure.
Greg
i thought suction cups were illegal.
*Originally posted by GregT *
**Very little of a plane’s lift comes from this, almost all of it comes from the angle of attack. Stick your hand out the window of your car, directly into the wind. Curve it, notice any difference? Now angle it up.The only way I can think of to leagally create suction (good suction) is to use pnumatics to move a plunger inside a tube. If done right you shouldn’t lose any pressure.
Greg **
What you’re talking about is the Bernoulli Effect. Basically, it means that as the speed of air increases, the density of the air decreases. In the case of an airplane, the curve of upper section of the wing causes the air to travel more quickly over the top than the bottom. This creates a lower air pressure on the top so the airplane lifts up.
Now, many modern planes use an “angle of attack.” What this means is, that as you fly, depending on how much lift you want, you change the angle of the wing, which causes the curve “seen” by the air to change. This gives a change in the amount of lift.
Matt
The reason why you would use a suction cup is because with no air between the cup and your surface, there’s no air pressure, and you get 14 pounds/square inch pressing down on your cup, increasing the force of friction. All you need is a large suction cup and use a pneumatic cylinder to press the air out. As for why airplanes fly, it’s mostly conservation of momentum with a little Bernoulli, according to my competent physics teacher. I’d use ansi art to illustrate but I suck at it. Basically, air flows into the turned wing and exerts a force on it up. As air travels down the back of a curved wing, again, conservation of momentum the wing must move up to have no momentum gain.
I’m fairly sure using the bernoulli principle would fall under the ‘custom pneumatic components’ section, anyway. I think the only way to make a vacuum legally involves actuating one pneumatic cylinder with another, creating a vacuum air connection of the cylinder being moved. If you attach this to a decent suction cup, you should be able to form a vacuum between that and any surface.
Tyson
think of how a plunger works / for a couple of bucks you have an inexpensive suction cup you could prototype with.
It shouldn’t take that much pressure to make a suction cup go down. It all depends on the material of the cup itself. I would think a normal automotive suction cup from msc would be the way to go. Those don’t look like they were designed to be used by a vacuum pump. Plus if what I’m guessing is true these suction cups can have 170pounds of suction.
Most of the tops of the containers i saw at FIRST were cracked and some of ours are as well…so dont count on sucking on the top of the container …it really sucks.
Jim:rolleyes:
*Originally posted by Matt Leese *
**What you’re talking about is the Bernoulli Effect. Basically, it means that as the speed of air increases, the density of the air decreases. In the case of an airplane, the curve of upper section of the wing causes the air to travel more quickly over the top than the bottom. This creates a lower air pressure on the top so the airplane lifts up.Now, many modern planes use an “angle of attack.” What this means is, that as you fly, depending on how much lift you want, you change the angle of the wing, which causes the curve “seen” by the air to change. This gives a change in the amount of lift.
Matt **
Very little of any planes lift actually comes from the Bernoulli Effect, this is just a widespread mis-conception. Yes, it does contribute, but it is not the largest lift component.
All planes change their AOA (angle of attack) not just modern planes. To climb a plane lowers it’s tail and points up, increasing the angle of attack and gaining more lift.
Greg
*Originally posted by frumious *
**I’m fairly sure using the bernoulli principle would fall under the ‘custom pneumatic components’ section, anyway. I think the only way to make a vacuum legally involves actuating one pneumatic cylinder with another, creating a vacuum air connection of the cylinder being moved. If you attach this to a decent suction cup, you should be able to form a vacuum between that and any surface.Tyson **
There are at least two other legal ways of creating a vacuum, though one only applies to suction cups. The first is simply hooking tubing up to the compressor inlet. Of course this makes it difficult to pressurize our pneumatic system at the same time, but it works and is legal. The pneumatics guy at the LA Kickoff said you should get about 24 inches of mercury vacuum from the compressor.
The other way is to push down on a suction cup until it’s flat. Push down on the cup with a ring and then pull up on the center. How hard a vacuum you get depends on how hard you pull. But there isn’t much volume so a slight leak could be trouble.
*Originally posted by GregT *
**Very little of any planes lift actually comes from the Bernoulli Effect, this is just a widespread mis-conception. Yes, it does contribute, but it is not the largest lift component.
**
If you want to start an argument, go to one of the aero newsgroups and ask “what creates lift?”. Even the aero guys can’t agree on an explanation that other people can understand, even other engineers. But they sure can calculate it.
While we are all aware of the top secret “Magic Smoke” factories that produce that crucial component installed in every electrical and electronic device; few people are aware of the small “Homesick Angel” installed in every type of aircraft.
Unfortunately (for aircraft designers) they have no say in which angel they get and some are more “homesick” than others. Early attempts a flight were often thwarted by the fact that most of the angels found here on earth were in no hurry to get back home. However, as time has passed and more and more aircraft take to the skies, more angels have been lured to earth.
By the way - I’d consider this thread officially Hi-Jacked <G>
Why can’t you hook your suction cups up to the intake of the compressor. It is on the left side when looking at the motor end. It has the white felt filter. Does anyone see how this would violate the rules???
The first is simply hooking tubing up to the compressor inlet. Of course this makes it difficult to pressurize our pneumatic system at the same time, but it works and is legal. The pneumatics guy at the LA Kickoff said you should get about 24 inches of mercury vacuum from the compressor.
Are you sure? when tried this, we found that both the connectors on teh compressor provide air going OUT, and that the intake was simply the air vents around the compressor.
Seems like the only way to create a vacuum is to have a motor (or another cylinder) pull a cylinder.
You can’t use the venturi effect to create a vaccum. What we might do is have to opposing pistons, one using the compressed air to have the other piston create a vaccum.
As for the airplane debate, I think it’s the bernoulli effect. Or at least that’s the most important component. The angle of attack does make a difference though but it’s important with the wing shape, that’s what the Wright brothers figured out. The curvature of the surface of the wing has low pressure, the bottom end has high pressure. Since you’ve got a plane with wings that have a large surface area, you’ve got a lot of lift force overall. The important part to lift is airspeed. If planes relied entirely on angle of attack, then in theory, your flaps that angle down would make the plane lift up on landing. (not too sure about that)
Wll when I took the compressor apart it looks like the only place air comes in is from the white felt area. Port A is discharge and B is the relief. Air should not normally come out of B. Some how you would have to hook an air sitting up to the white felt area but then this might be constued as altering the compressor.
So what we are going to do is use the fisher price motor to pull a cylinder to create vacumn. If you look at the threaded rod that came with the kit it appears as if it and the black plastic nut were designed to fit with the fisher price motor gear box.
It sucks that you just can’t use an eductor.