I know that a lot of teams have been comparing the robots and trying to measure their success, but, besides the thread on human penalties, I haven’t seen much on how the human players rank. I was wonderng if any one had come up for a way of ranking the players, particularly payload specialists.
That would be kind of tough to do without someone tracking shooting percentages, etc. live. Technically, the team OPR reflects the HP’s contributions, but I can not think of a way to separate out the HP contribution.
Ok my 0.02;
Track the teams NetScores, if they are doing good this score will be higher, if they do worse then they will score less.
Tracking human player skill is a really tricky operation because each match varies so much for the player. Outpost players are at a disadvantage because they are sitting, and some others may get lucky if a robot doesnt show and they have an empty trailer to dump on.
Good human players should be have the following in order of importance:
Doesn’t get penalties
90+% on stationary trailers in front of their station (no robot or no robot auton)
60+% on moving trailers within 15 feet (for supercells)
Capable of the occasional hail mary for the win
Judging human players is more subjective than judging robots; just look for consistency