I’ve never actually posted that we have a team site, even though I’ve sent links out to it before. After a long talk with my web team, we’ve decided to finally post it for everyone to see. Please keep in mind the Spanish section is NOT finished due to our school blocking our login pages.
You do have some HTML errors that… for full (or optimal, at least) compatibility you should fix.
For example, your link to your spanish version has <a href="…" alt=“text here”>. anchors do not have support for alt… but if you are looking for mouse over text, you should use
title=“the text here”
in the anchor code. Secondly, the use of <center> has been depreciated over the years. You really should use <div align=“center”> </div> or something like that.
I like how you just sorta end your website without a body or html tag.
<img src="http://www.team1065.com/pics/teamsmall.JPG" alt="team picture">
</center> (the end)
Just tack on some ending html tags and you’ll be fine.
Didn’t your mommy ever tell you you’re not supposed to use tables to layout your site? There’s really no need for the huge amount of tables on your site. I also love the table within a table.
I’m not trying to be mean I’m just in a really sarcastic mood. I couldn’t find anything wrong with the front-end of your site so had to make fun of your code. You’ve got an amazing amount of content. Being multi-lingual is something alot of team websites lack (including me). Is it computer translated or human generated? Good luck with your website.
if you don’t like tables i wouldn’t look at my site’s source code.:rolleyes:…it has like 5 nested tables…btw im going to redo the site this summer with css but i needed to get it done quick so i used tables.
/forest
Ok, so your wrong. There is nothing wrong with using tables in a web site. Actually they are actually a very powerful tool in laying out your site. When used in unison with CSS ( you can combine the two ) they can display data in very creative AND SIMPLE TO MANAGE ways. Instead of messing around with a DIV within a DIV within a DIV and their float values and margins you have one table and that it. And as far as what people call accessibility, it makes no difference if you are using pure tables, pure CSS, or both, they will all validate if you code them right, and you should code them right. So in conclusion, you just got based, that is all.
You mean biased. You need to read this: The problem with using tables.
I don’t want to derail this thread so I’m not gonna bring this up anymore. Let me just say tables are not simple to go through and manage.
the w3c explicitly states in the xhtml definition that tables should not be used for layout.
tables render screen readers useless, and make your site a pain in the butt for blind people to read. they will hear something like 'table with three columns and two rows. table with two columns and five rows. link. graphic. new row. graphic ‘header’. …
tables are meant to be used for tabular data like spreadsheets, timetables, and calendars.
table based websites take far longer to change than css-based websites because they are so rigidly structured.
you show absolutely no skill at web design if you have to use tables for your layout, and then argue that tables are meant to do that. thats like using framesets to design your site, totally last decade. You can achieve all of that with css.