Posted by michael bastoni, Coach on team #23, PNTA, from Plymouth North High School and Boston Edison Co.
Posted on 5/7/99 7:12 PM MST
Guys (Women included),
Isn’t the solution to your frustration obvious?
The kids, the engineers, the teachers and the marvelous
parents that help…they all need the same remedy for the
same frustration…they all need to PLAY WITH THEIR ROBOT MORE…
Not wait till next year to work so very hard to play
so very little…but to work very hard to play ALOT…
To play enough to make the effort worthwhile…and I can
think of only one way to accomplish this without all of us giving
up our day job…extend the FIRST cycle time to 36-48 months…
It is PLAYING WITH THE ROBOT that is just as inspirational
as building it…
FYI
I just returned from 2 days at the MIT 2007 Design Competition.
Wow…very cool…and looking more and more like FIRST.
The 2007 design competition is the genesis of FIRST…it
is the competition orginated by the good doctor his own self.
DEKA hung a banner and the MIT FIRST team offered a
show and tell…
I went because I wanted to ‘sense’ the roots of FIRST…
I went because I am listening to Dodd Stacy and JJ and Tom Wibble
and so many more of you who do not frequent these pages…
and I am trying desperately to formulate a consensus…
I believe we are all searching for a way through the
FIRST woods…and we are coming close…
But I noticed one thing at 2007…the students are doing the
design process FOR COURSE CREDIT…the students are
BUILDING THE MACHINES…and every student who completes
a machine gets an A for the course…Participation
in 2007 is FREE (There have been kit costs in the past
but GM made them free this year)and get this…of the original
contestants…about 50% were none or low functional…
But please note that those top robots who were functional were
very functional…
So within the parameters of 2007, a builder can work hard
learn by doing and laugh when things go wrong…and
walk away with little or no frustration…
Because,
They have not sold themselves to a sponsor, promised
their community that if they send them to Disney World
they will do their best (and be their luckiest)…moreover
The kind wonderful MIT prof’s are not neglecting
curriculum development because 2007 IS CURRICULM…and
students are not forgoing grades because 2007 IS THEIR GRADE…
Putting FIRST in the classroom is one way to make it
serve the valuable purpose that 2007 serves…and this is becoming even more
more attractive since the state educational frameworks has added
Engineering to the Scince and Technology strand …and
making the game more PLAYABLE is a way to get it into the schools.
After all,no sports teams practice six to eight weeks in order to
play only twice…the kids simply would not stand for it.
Campaigning a machine that you as a student helped to maintain,
in some instances to design and fabricate…is very
very inspirational…not to mention empowering…
Look, many FIRST teams have been fortunate in placing many of our FIRST
students into good competetive colleges and universities,
…because we can write wonderful
truthful letters ABOUT WHAT THEY DID TO MAKE A TEAM SUCCESSFUL
not about how inspired they are…but WHAT THEY ACTUALLY DID…
Quantitative, descriptive assessments…not anecdotal
meanderings about how much they like technology.
I loved 2007…I loved the scale of it…the robot building and design
effort is in proportion to the playing time.Maybe
all we have to do is to get our building effort/costs to
playing time proportions in line…
and hats off to Alex Slockum the professor who runs it is a worthy antecedent to
Woodie hisself…