What is the legality of using an electronic door magnet as part of a hanging mechanism? The rules say the pipe is schedule 40 steel.
Here is a magnet rated for 600lbs @ 12V. Someone in the reviews says it takes 350mA which is about 4.2W
The rules say you can use electrical solenoids that are up to 10W continuous. Would this count? Are the other rules that would prevent someone from using these?
Might be a good way to connect/disconnect from a rung
Electrical solenoid actuators, no greater than 1 in. (nominal) stroke and rated electrical input power no greater than 10 watts (W) continuous duty at 12 volts (VDC)
There is a Q&A up for this already (Q38). Hoping it is answered with something other than āblah blah REFEREE blah blah blah head REFEREE blah blah blahā
Itās an interesting idea. Be sure to think about what happens when the match ends mid-climb and the robot disables. Unless something else is also holding it up, your robot will be on the express elevator.
Weāll wait on this yearās Q&A for a difinitive answer, but as reference, in past years the GDC split hairs on this sort of thing. One used purely for holding was not considered a solenoid, while one that caused motion was. Itāll be interesting to see if they stick with that, or rule differently this year!
Legality aside, these latches derive their holding force from having effectively zero gap between the electromagnet and the flat steel plate. The force applied to a round pipe, probably not exactly in line with the magnetās axis, will be far less. Even the powder coating will reduce the force significantly.
I strongly suspect that the strength of one of these operating on [powder coated] iron pipe will be greatly improved by a piece of steel which follows the pipeās curvature more closely.
And as was noted previously, this is probably* NOT a solution for the final rung.
* Long shot: If you can both get this electromagnet ruled NOT an actuator, AND if the switched circuit on the PDH will hold an āenergizedā state when the robot is disabled, AND ALSO you 're confident in having enough charge left in your battery, you can think about going that route. I would definitely put a physical hook on the traversal bar and skip these three ifs.
I cannot see how an electromagnetic would not be an actuator. For clarity, as you imply, it is not legal to drive actuators with the switched circuit on the PDH (that was changed in R503 in Team Update 1 because the PDH switched circuit state is not controlled by enable/disable).
As somebody who has used these in industry, Iām not going to say they wonāt work, but they likely wonāt as the 600lb rating depends on correct alignment with the door plate. Iāve tested whether or not the magnet is working with my screw driver and I can easily remove it from the magnet.
In principle, I totally agree, but this has happened before. Note also that I put this out as a long shot: that both the GDC rules decisions AND physics had to work out in your favor.
Time for some STEM education. The force generated by a magnet is proportional to the inverse of the distance to the magnet cubed. Thus, the magnetic force falls off dramatically with distance. As others have suggested, the flat surface of these magnets is not the best for attaching to a round surface. This is because the distance from the magnet increases as the tube curves away from the contact point.
The weight of these magnets is quite considerable at around 4 lb. Controlling an arm with this 4 pound weight on the end will be much more difficult than controlling an arm with a hook on the end.
It may be possible to make a climbing mechanism work using one of these magnets and I would love to see it because it appears to be a rather difficult but novel way to solve the problem.