There are plenty more names than there will be fields. The names should be put on a rotation year to year.
“‘Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down? That’s not my department,’ says Wernher von Braun.”](http://youtu.be/TjDEsGZLbio?t=40s)
Whatever you make of his motivations, the chances of FIRST naming a field after von Braun are essentially zero.
Leibniz!!!
…Tesla, Grace, Faraday, Pascal, Hawking, and Feynman are my other favorites. Oppenheimer and von Braun probably won’t happen 
Ummmm…
I think we should just go with von Braun’s predecessor who is far less controversial.
Dr. Robert Hutchings Goddard
How is it possible that we’ve talked women and mathematicians but haven’t said Emmy Noether?
[Alan] Turing
Pythagoras [of Samos]
[Temple] Grandin
[Muḥammad ibn Mūsā] al-Khwārizmī
How about America’s greatest living inventor…Kamen Field.
I forgot the obvious one that works on many levels…
BACON!!!
Since no one has said it yet how about Baker 
.
I really like Euclid, Tesla, Hopper, and the older JVN http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_von_Neumann for my top four choices
I’ve thought about it, and even though I’d personally love a field named after an Arab Muslim, I don’t think it should happen, because people have enough problems with Curie 
On a broader note, I don’t think FIRST can go wrong here. 2/2 or 3/4 of the new fields really should be named after minorities of some kind, but there’s more than a dozen good options mentioned here. I’m just excited to see who they pick.
I like this one
I personally would vote for Mandelbrot cause he is awesome, But I also back Lovelace and Hopper.
Faraday
Tesla
Turing
Perlman, for Radia Perlman. Her work on early network protocols has probably had the greatest lasting impact on the internet than any single person’s contributions.
Ramanujan would be cool, too.
I think it’s unlikely to happen, as there is a financial cost to having a new name (all the banners, etc). However, this did spawn an idea that would be less costly than renaming all the fields each year.
What if the winning division got “naming rights” to the championship field, and then was retired? For 2015, retire Einstein (and Archimedes, Galileo & Newton) as a field name, and the divisional winners get to play off on the Curie field. For 2016, retire the Curie name and the winners get to play off on a field named for the division that wins in 2015. This allows for some name rotation, reduces the cause of cycling all the fields from year to year, and seems like a good way to celebrate braking the “Curie curse”.
Feynman, Richard Feynman - an excellent physicist, dramatic actor, and teacher. He introduced the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics theory, and superfluidity of liquid helium. His form of dramatic teaching engaged his students and introduced physics concepts in a new, more relatable, and more memorable way. For many of his classes, other professors and graduate students would outnumber the actual students in the classroom because his presentations were so phenomenal. He developed and used a very pictorial representations of mathematical expressions describing the behavior of subatomic particles. These later became known as the Feynman diagrams. He is also credited with pioneering the field of quantum computing and nanotechnology. His merits would certainly earn him a name among the ranks of the fields.
**tl;dr **
Richard Feynman widely known for development in subatomic and quantum physics. Was an excellent teacher. Drew shapes to replace complicated math.
“Will science ever get over its’ collective crush on Richard Feynman?”
–Randall Munroe
I personally doubt almost all of the choices already given. If we look at what FIRST has chosen for names they are not engineers and there are many who are arguable more disturbing. What the requirement would seem to be is that the names be common in popular culture and used regularly by non scientists.
And so with that in mind:
Darwin
Hawking
Aristotle
Tesla
Pasteur
da Vinci
Bohr
Edison
da Vinci and Edison (and Franklin) are out. FTC fields Edison and Franklin are grouped as da Vinci.
Samuel Morse.
Alexander Graham Bell.
If you’re looking for a minority, I hear “the real McCoy” (Elijah McCoy) was a pretty prolific inventor, with 57 patents to his name.
I second Lovelace, and I absolutely love tesla…
also another female scientist to consider:
Caroline Herschel (she was an astronomer and the first woman to spot a comet)
plus the name sounds pretty cool 