- Yes - <28" Tall
I’m thinking most teams that have actually given this decision the proper weight won’t know their answer until at least the end of the day today, if not in a few days or longer
Our immediate, gut reaction was that we’d like to go through the trench to make cycle time more efficient. However, there is a huge case for having a tall-ish robot (defending shots into high goals, another robot obstructing vision cameras). These can be designed around and made such that you can have a robot that is short but still can handle it (971, anyone?), but it’s an assuredly complex problem.
Ninja edit: We won’t hard commit to either until we’ve let it stew for a bit, and even then, our design priorities need to agree with that too.
I agree that this is in no way finalized I just wanted to get some initial impressions as I heard wildly varying opinions from everybody will go through the trench to nobody will.
If we drive fast enough, yes.
JK. We’re still deciding.
This topic was automatically closed 365 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.